Abstract
Gongsun denounced artificial intervention based on ideas and reasons. He could debate the liberal global governance as he did Confucianism because his criticism of the Confucian ritual and would-be criticism of the liberal due process could rest upon the same sensibility toward individualized condition. Gongsun and post-Western quest are in line with each other in that they shared alert to any overarching claim of legitimacy for interventionary action. However, Gongsun was not interested in detecting the geo-cultural root as the “objective” foundation — and thus, legitimacy — of a declared distinctive hybridity. For him, a distinctive claim based on sited objectivity could be either redundant or dangerous because of various manipulative purposes that such a claim is meant to achieve. He was suspicious toward the naming of any claimed hybridity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Nathan Andrews, “Globalization, Global Governance, and Cosmopolitanism: A Critical Exploration of European Practice,” CEU Political Science Journal 7, 4 (2012): 411–433.
Mustapha Kamal Pasha, “Islam, ‘Soft’ Orientalism and Hegemony: A Gramscian Rereading,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8, 4 (2005): 543–558.
Arif Dirlik, “The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism,” Critical Inquiry, 20, 2 (Winter, 1994): 328–356.
Rolan Barthes, “The Death of the Author,” (trans.) Richard Howard, Aspen 5–6 (Fall–Winter 1967): n.p.
Chunpo Zhang, and Jialong Zhang, “Logic and Language in Chinese Philosophy,” in Brian Carr, (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy ( London: Routledge, 1997 )
Hubert Schleichert, “Gong-sun Long on the Semantics of ‘World’,” in Lenk and Paul (eds.), Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy ( Albany: SUNY, 1993 ): 113–117
Ernst Joachim Vierheller, “Object Language and Meta-Language in the Gongsun-long-zi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 20, 2 (1993): 181–210.
Pauline Rosenau, Post-Modernism and Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992 ).
Bongjin Kim, “Rethinking of the Pre-Modern East Asian Region Order,” Journal of East Asian Studies 2, 2 (August 2002): 67–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Chih-yu Shih and Po-tsan Yu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shih, Cy., Yu, Pt. (2015). Engaging in Our Time. In: Post-Western International Relations Reconsidered: The Pre-Modern Politics of Gongsun Long. Global Political Thinkers. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493217_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493217_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56957-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49321-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)