Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter discusses how contingent f acuity can be competitive in the marketplace by participating in two complimentary professional activities—online teaching and born digital scholarship. These nontraditional activities allow contingent f acuity to demonstrate information technology skills and innovation and can build an author’s reputation quickly and foster collaboration. The authors also explore challenges associated with electronic teaching and publishing activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 67.50
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). “Statement on Copyright.” American Association of University Professionals. American Association of University Professionals (1999): 214–216. Web. 22 February 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Botterbusch, Hope R. and Preston Parker. “Copyright and Collaborative Spaces: Open Licensing and Wikis.” TechTrends 52.1 (2008): 7–9. Web. 26 March 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bukvova, Helena. “Taking New Routes: Blogs, Web sites, and Scientific Publishing.” ScieCom Info 7.2 (2011): 1–6. Web. 26 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burton, Gideon. ‘“Born-Digital’ Scholarship.” Terms and Issues. Brigham Young University, 2005. Web. 26 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman, Diane D. “Contingent and Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty: Motivations and Incentives to Teach Distance Education Courses.” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 14.3 (2011): n. page. Web. 26 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, Patricia. “Scholars Test Web Alternative to Peer Review.” The New York Times 23 August 2010: A1. Web. 26 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cummings, Alex Sayf and Jonathan Jarrett. “Only Typing? Informal Writing, Blogging and the Academy (Spring 2012 version)” Writing History in the Digital Age: A Born-Digital, Open Review Volume. Ed. Jack Dougherty and Kristen Nawrotzki. Hartford: Trinity College, 2012. n. page. Web. 28 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dahl, Judy. “Distance Ed-The Enemy of Academic Freedom.” Distance Education Report 8.10 (2004): 3–6. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dawson, Ashley. “Academic Freedom and the Digital Revolution.” AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom 1 (2010): 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devary, Sharon. “National Distance Education Trends and Issues: Intellectual Property.” Distance Learning 5.1 (2008): 55–60. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DiRamio, David C. and Gerald C. Kops. “Distance Education and Digital Intellectual Property Issues.” Planning for Higher Education (2004): 37–46. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferguson, Rebecca, Gill Clough, and Anesa Hosein. “Shifting Themes, Shifting Roles: The Development of Research Blogs.” “Into Something Rich and Strange” — Making Sense of the Sea-Change. 2010. The 17th Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT-C 2010), 7–9 September 2010, Nottingham, UK. Web. 28 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garon, Jon M. “Wiki Authorship, Social Media, and the Curatorial Audience.” Harvard journal of Sports and Entertainment Law 1.1 (2010): 95. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, Randolph W. “Scholarship, Liberated from Paper at Last.” Chronicle of Higher Education 58.31 (2012): A27. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klein, Michael W. “Ten Years after Managed Professionals” Who Owns Intellectual Property Now?” Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy 2.1/2 (2010): 1–. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kranch, Douglas A. “Who Owns Course Intellectual Property?” The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 9.4 (2008): 349–356. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lamb, Brian. “Wide Open Spaces: Wiki or Not.” Educause Review Online 35.5 (2004): 36–48. Web. 26 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McGee, Patricia and Veronica Diaz. “Planning for the Digital Classroom and Distributed Learning: Policies and Planning for Online Instructional Resources.” Planning f or Higher Education 33.4 (2005): 12–24. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parker, Kim, Amanda Lenhart, and Kathleen Moore. The Digital Revolution and Higher Education: College Presidents, Public Differ on Value of Online Learning. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2011. Web. 28 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Radford, Alexandria Walton. “Learning at a Distance Undergraduate Enrollment in Distance Education Courses and Degree Programs.” Stats n Brief (Oct. 2011): NCES 2012–154. U.S. Department of Education. Web. 28 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ramsey, Colin and Martha McCaughey. “Copyright for Academics in the Digital Age.” Academe 98.5 (2012): 10–17. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shema, Hadas, Judit Bar-Ilan, and Mike Thelwall. “Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information.” PloS one 7.5 (2012): e35869. Web. 28 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, Mark F. “Intellectual Property and the AAUP.” Academe 88.5 (2002): 39–42. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Special Committee on Distance Education and Intellectual Property Issues. “Sample Intellectual Property Policy & Contract Language.” American Association of University Professionals. American Association of University Professionals, n.d. Web. 19 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ulius, Sara. “Intellectual Property Ownership in Distributed Learning.” Educause Review July/August 2003: 62–63. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  26. United States Copyright Office. “Copyright Basics.” About. Library of Congress, May 2012:1–12. Web. 28 March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Ke, and Alison A. Carr-Chellman. “Courseware Copyright: Whose Rights are Right?.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 34.2 (2006): 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Julia A. Watson and Leslie Worrell Christianson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watson, J.A., Christianson, L.W. (2015). Born-Digital Work: Opportunities for Collaboration and Career Growth. In: Guglielmo, L., Gaillet, L.L. (eds) Contingent Faculty Publishing in Community: Case Studies for Successful Collaborations. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137491626_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics