Abstract
There have been many epochs when territories were subject to multiple systems of rule.1 The current condition we see developing with globalization is probably by far the more common one, while the more exceptional period is the one that saw the strengthening of the national state. In this context, digitization can be seen as enabling a new type of cross-border process that can bypass interstate borders and constitute its own specific bordered spaces. The actors in these new types of transversally bordered spaces range from small, resource-poor organizations and individuals to powerful private financial trading networks (notably the so-called ‘dark pools’). Further, we see the formation of novel kinds of internal borderings that can bring particular types of advantages to at least some actors and institutions. Elsewhere I have theorized these as holes in the tissue of national sovereign territory; again, digital technologies have enabled this development, but it is not necessarily a completely new condition: one might think of the distinctive jurisdiction of international churches as having some of the same features (Sassen 2008, chapters 8 and 9).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, M, Buzan, B & Zurn, M (eds.) 2013, Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Alford, RP 2003, ‘The American influence on International arbitration’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, vol. 19, no. 69, pp. 69–88.
Arora, P 2014, The Leisure Commons: A Spatial History of Web 2.0, Routledge, Oxford.
Avgerou, C 2002, Information Systems and Global Diversity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Beck, U 1996, The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order, Polity, UK.
Benkler, Y 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Bollier, D 2009, Viral Spiral: How the Commoners Built a Digital Republic of Their Own, New Press, New York.
Carbonneau, TE 2014, The Law and Practice of Arbitration, 5th ed., Juris Publishing, Huntington.
Castells, M 2009, Communication Power, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cederman, L-E & Kraus, PA 2005, ‘Transnational communications and the European Demos’, in Digital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm, eds. R. Latham & S. Sassen, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 283–311.
Cerny, PG 2000, Public Goods, States and Governance in a Globalizing World, Routledge, London.
Charny, D 1991, ‘Competition among jurisdictions in corporate law rules: An American perspective on the “race to the bottom” in The European Communities’, Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 423–56.
Daniels, J 2009, Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD.
Dean, J, Anderson, JW & Lovink, G 2006, Reformatting Politics: Information Technology and Global Civil Society, Routledge, London.
De Been, W 2012, ‘Continuity or regime change in the Netherlands: Consociationalism in a deterritiorialized and post-secular world’, Ethnicities, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 531–55.
Derudder, B, Taylor, P, Ni, P, De Vos, A, Hoyler, M, Hanssens, H, Bassens, D, Huang, J, Witlox, F, Shen, W & Yang, X 2010, ‘Pathways of change: Shifting connectivities in the World City Network, 2000–2008’, Urban Studies, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1861–77.
Dezalay, Y and Bryant, G 1995, ‘Merchants of law as moral entrepreneurs: Constructing International justice out of the competition for International business disputes’, Law & Society Review, vol. 29, pp. 27–64.
Drake, WJ & Williams III, EM 2006, Governing Global Electronic Networks: International Perspectives on Policy and Power, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Electronic Frontier Foundation 2011, ‘Activist training manual’, presented at the Ruckus Society Tech Toolbox Action Camp, 24 June–2 July, Available from: https://www.eff.org/search/site/Activist%20training%20manual.
Fraser, N 2007, ‘Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world’, special section: Transnational public sphere, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 7–30.
Gill, SC & Cutler, A (eds.) 2015, New Constitutionalism and World Order, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Harvey, R 2007, ‘The sub-national constitution of global markets’, in Deciphering the Global: Its Spaces, Scales and Subjects, ed. S. Sassen, Routledge, New York and London, pp. 199–216.
Hildebrandt, M 2013, ‘Extraterritorial jurisdiction to enforce in cyberspace?: Bodin, Schmitt, Grotius in cyberspace’, University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 196–224.
Knorr, C & Preda, A (eds.) 2013, Handbook of The Sociology of Finance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Latham, R & Sassen, S 2005, ‘Introduction. Digital formations: Constructing an object of study’, in Digital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm, eds. R. Latham & S. Sassen, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 1–34.
Lovink, G & Dean, J 2010, Blog Theory: Feedback and Capture in the Circuits of Drive, Polity, UK.
Mansell, R, Avgerou, C, Quah, D & Silverstone, R (eds.) 2009, The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Rainie, L & Wellman, B 2012, Networked: The New Social Operating System, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sassen, S 2014, Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London, England.
Sassen, S 2013a, ‘Visible formalizations and formally invisible facticities’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp 3–27.
Sassen, S 2013b, ‘When territory deborders territoriality’, Territory, Politics, Governance, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013, pp. 21–45.
Sassen, S 2013c, ‘Land grabs today: Feeding the disassembling of national territory’ Globalizations, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–46.
Sassen, S 2012, ‘Interactions of the technical and the social: Digital formations of the powerful and the powerless’, Information, Communication & Society, DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2012.667912.
Sassen, S 2006, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Sassen, S 1999, ‘Digital networks and power’, in Spaces of Culture: City, Nation, World, eds. M. Featherstone & S. Lash, Sage, London, pp. 49–63.
Shapiro, M 1993, ‘The globalization of law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 1, pp. 37–64.
Tennant, EW 2007, ‘Locating transnational activists: Solidarity with and beyond propinquity’, in Deciphering the Global: Its Spaces, Scales and Subjects, ed. S. Sassen, Routledge, New York and London, pp. 119–38.
Teubner, G 2004, ‘Societal constitutionalism: Alternatives to state-centered constitutional theory’, in Transnational governance and constitutionalism, eds. C. Joerges, I. Sand & G. Teubner, Hartford Publishing, Hartford, pp. 3–28.
Trachtman, J 1993, ‘International regulatory competition, externalization, and jurisdiction’, Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 47–104.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Saskia Sassen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sassen, S. (2015). From National Borders to Embedded Borderings: One Angle into the Question of Territory and Space in a Global Age. In: de Been, W., Arora, P., Hildebrandt, M. (eds) Crossroads in New Media, Identity and Law. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137491268_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137491268_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50444-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49126-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)