Advertisement

And You Gotta Believe Me: When Social and Human Capital Collide

  • Janice Kroeger
Part of the Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood book series (CCSC)

Abstract

Human capital theories that dominate the educational theories of our times, focusing upon skills, test scores, and competition in economic markets often deny the existence of other relevant and valid ways of looking at learners and teaching, and in so doing deny other purposes of healthy communities. Theorists have argued that pedagogic approaches resting on these Human Capital arguments result in “apolitical” or decontextualized systems of thinking and are often misapplied to other contexts. Such thinkers have argued for more socially responsive alternatives (Baptiste, 2001; Penn, 2005; Rodriguez, 2009). One result of such narrowing of thinking is a focus on assumed links between academic achievement and employment opportunity (Lightfoot-Rueda & Peach, introduction of this volume) often at the expense of social relevance of curriculum in the young child’s classroom, a cornerstone of student motivation.

Keywords

Social Capital Human Capital Preservice Teacher Cultural Capital Civic Engagement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adair, J. (2008). White pre-service teachers and “de-privileged spaces.” Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 189–206.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1934/1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Michael Holquist (Ed.) & C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Trans.). Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baptiste, I. (2001). Educating lone wolves: Pedagogical implications of human capital theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3), 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. Republished in I. Szeman & T. Kaposy (Eds.) (2011), Cultural theory: An anthology (pp. 81–93). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). Considering the possibilities. In In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, M. G., & Brooks, J. G. (2004). The courage to be constructivist. In A. S. Canestrari & B. A. Marlowe (Eds.), Educational foundations: An anthology of critical readings. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Compton-Lilly, C. (2003). Reading families. The literate lives of urban children. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51.Google Scholar
  9. Fennimore, B. (2008). Talk about children. In C. Genishi & L. Goodwin (Eds.), Diversities in early childhood education: Rethinking and doing (pp. 185–200). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Heilman, E. (2008). Hegemonies and “transgressions” of family: Tales of pride and prejudice. In T. Turner-Vorbeck & M. Miller Marsh (Eds.), Other Kinds of Families: Embracing Diversity in Schools (7–27). New York:Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hökkä, P., Eteläpelto, A., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2012). The professional agency of teacher educators amid academic discourses. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 38(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, A. S., Baker, A., & Bruner, L. (2007). Interdependence, garbage dumping, and feral dogs: Exploring three life world resources of young children in rural school. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(6), 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kroeger, J. (2005). Social heteroglossia: The contentious practice or potential place of middle-class parents in home-school relations. The Urban Review, 37(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kroeger, J., & Lash, M. (2011). Asking, listening, and learning: Toward a more thorough method of inquiry in home-school relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kroeger, J., & Myers, C. Y. (2013). Deconstructing myths about families in poverty: Working for young children & communities through curriculum in the primary grades, examples from pre-service teaching and talk. Research paper presented to the Critical and Reconceptualist Special Interest Group at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Kroeger, J., Pech, S., & Cope, J. (2009). Investigating change in field sites through mentor and candidate dialogues. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 30, 328–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nafukho, F. M., Hairston, N. R., Brooks, K. (2004). Human capital theory: Implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 7(4), 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Youth Leadership Council. (2010). The service learning cycle. The Generator, 28(3), 2.Google Scholar
  22. Penn, H. (2005). Understanding early childhood: Issues and controversies. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pushor, D. (2010). Are schools doing enough to learn about families? In M. M. Marsh & T. Turner-Vorbeck (Eds.), (Mis)understanding families: Learning from real families in our schools (pp. 4–16). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rodriguez, L. F. (2009). Dialoguing, cultural capital, and student engagement: Toward a hip hop pedagogy in high school and university classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(1), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Street, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge at work in the writing classroom. Theory to Practice. Multicultural Education, 13(2), 1–4.Google Scholar
  26. Tashagorri, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Trainor, A. A. (2010). Reexamining the promise of parent participation in special education: An analysis of cultural and social capital. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 41(3), 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wegman, K. M., & Bowen, G. L. (2010). Strengthening connections between schools and diverse families: A cultural capital perspective. The Prevention Researcher, 17(3), 7–12.Google Scholar
  29. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Theodora Lightfoot-Rueda and Ruth Lynn Peach 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janice Kroeger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations