Skip to main content

Regulating Social Policy in the EU and Mercosur: Patterns and Developments in Social Security and Related Areas

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Development, Justice and Citizenship Series ((SIID))

Abstract

Neither the European Union (EU) founding Treaty of Rome (1957) nor the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) Tratado de Asunción (1991) included strong competences for social policy provisions. Rather, both regional integration processes emphasize market integration. The dominant philosophy is that economic growth stemming from the liberalization of a common market should provide for social policy advances. Nevertheless, over the years, the EU and Mercosur have developed a substantial social dimension. Comparing regional integration processes, Deacon et al. (2011, p. 351) classified the EU as most advanced in social policy, followed by the Southern American regional integration process. Taking these assessments as a starting point, this chapter is interested in a more detailed description of social policy developments and patterns that have emerged over time and across sub-areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • E. Achtsioglou and M. Doherty (2014) ‘There Must Be Some Way Out of Here: The Crisis, Labour Rights and Member States in the Eye of the Storm’, European Law Journal, 20(2), 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Birdsall, N. Lustig and D. McLeod (2012) ‘Routledge handbook of Latin American politics’, in P. Kingston and D. J. Yashan (eds.) Declining Inequality in Latin America (New York and London: Taylor & Francis).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • S. Bornschier (2013) ‘Trayectorias históricas y responsiveness del sistema de partidos en siete países de América Latina’, América Latina Hoy, 65, 45–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Deacon, P. De Lombaerde, M. C. Macovei and S. Schröder (2011) ‘Globalisation and the Emerging Regional Governance of Labour Rights’, International Journal of Manpower, 32(3), 334–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Di Tella (2004) History of Political Parties in 20th Century Latin America (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Döring (2013) ‘The Collective Action of Data Collection: A Data Infrastructure on Parties, Elections and Cabinets’, European Union Politics, 14(1), 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Golub (2007) ‘Survival Analysis and European Union Decision-Making’, European Union Politics, 8(2), 155–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. González Ferrera and R. Queirolo Verlasco (2013) ‘Izquierda y derecha: Formas de definirlas, el caso latinoamericano y sus implicaciones’, América Latina Hoy, 65, 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. M. Häge (2011) ‘The European Union Policy-Making Dataset’, European Union Politics, 12(3), 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Hartlapp (2007) ‘On Enforcement, Management and Persuasion: Different Logics of Implementation Policy in the EU and the ILO’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 653–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Hartlapp (2015) ‘Politicization of the European Commission: When, how and with what impact?’, in M. W. Bauer and J. Trondal (eds.) The Administrative System of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hartlapp, J. Metz and C. Rauh (2014) Which Policy for Europe?: Power and Conflict Inside the European Commission (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Hibbs (1977) ‘Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy’, American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Hix (2001) ‘Legislative Behaviour and Party Competition in the European Parliament: An Application of Nominate to the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Höpner, A. Petring, D. Seikel and B. Werner (2011) ‘Liberalisierungspolitik. Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Rückführung wirtschafts-und sozialpolitischer Interventionen in entwickelten Industrieländern’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 63(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Huber and S. Niedzwiecki (2015) ‘Emerging welfare states in Latin America and East Asia’ in S. Leibfried, F. Nullmeier, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. Levy and J. Stephens (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Transformation of the State (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Keck and K. Sikkink (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca and New York: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lenz (2011) ‘Spurred Emulation. The EU and Regional Integration in Mercosur and SADC’, West European Politics 35(1), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Levi-Faur (2011) ‘The Odyssey of the Regulatory State: Episode One: The Rescue of the Welfare State’, Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, Working Paper No. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Manow, A. Schäfer and H. Zorn (2007) ‘Europe’s Party-Political Center of Gravity, 1957–2003’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15(1), 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. G. March and J. P. Olsen (1984) ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’, The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Riggirozzi (2013) ‘Health policy in UNASUR: Tackling germs, brokering norms and contesting power’, in Regionalism, Norm Diffusion and Social Policy: Dealing with Old and New Crises in Europe and Latin America, Berlin, 22 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sáez Alcántara (2008) Politicians and Politics in Latin America (Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. G. Schmidt (1996) ‘When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy’, European Journal of Political Research, 30(2), 155–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Tsebelis (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (New York: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • T. Veen (2011) ‘The Dimensionality and Nature of Conflict in European Union Politics: On the Characteristics of Intergovernmental Decision-Making’, European Union Politics, 12(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Miriam Hartlapp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartlapp, M. (2016). Regulating Social Policy in the EU and Mercosur: Patterns and Developments in Social Security and Related Areas. In: Bianculli, A.C., Hoffmann, A.R. (eds) Regional Organizations and Social Policy in Europe and Latin America. Development, Justice and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490353_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490353_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57095-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49035-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics