Skip to main content

Conditions for Effective Regional Social (Health) Policies: The EU and Unasur Compared

  • Chapter
Book cover Regional Organizations and Social Policy in Europe and Latin America

Part of the book series: Development, Justice and Citizenship Series ((SIID))

  • 342 Accesses

Abstract

It is difficult to elaborate on the development of social policies without alluding to the vital role played by the International Labour Organization (ILO) in developing the idea of a social protection floor (Deacon 2013). The ILO has also been at the forefront in articulating a sharper role for regional organizations in the area of social policies. Its commitment to highlighting the need for regional integration to be anchored around social policies as tools with which to attenuate the negative effects of economic globalization burgeoned especially from 2004. In the course of that year, the ILO issued a commissioned report that considered the various ways in which regional integration could be used to cushion citizens against the debilitating impacts of economic globalization. It made clear that it was useful ‘to build on efforts by regional groupings to promote social cohesion and solidarity among their members’ (World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization (WCSDG) 2004, p. 7). The document explored some of the merits and benefits of regional social policies including better resilience to outside economic pressures, stronger political weight notably for smaller countries, enhanced regional capacities and better links to the global economy (WCSDG 2004, p. 71).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • B. Batchelor (2009) ‘Patent Attack — The EC Sector Inquiry’s Interim Findings’, European Competition Law Review, 30(5), 212–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2007) ‘Brazil to Break Aids Drug Patent’, BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6626073.stm, 30 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bedjaoui (1994) ‘On the efficacy of international organizations: Some variations on an inexhaustible theme’, in N. Blokker and S. Muller (eds.) Towards More Effective Supervision by International Organizations: Essays in Honour of Henry G. Schermers, Vol I (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers), 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Benkimoun and A. Duparc (2010) ‘L’OMS est-elle encore credible?’, Le Monde, 30 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil (2009) ‘Access to medicines and intellectual property in Brazil: A civil society experience, in Ford Foundation and ABIA’, in Intellectual Property Rights and Access to ARV Medicines: Civil Society Resistance in the Global South: Brazil, Colombia, China, India and Thailand (Brazilian Interdisciplinary AIDS Association/ABIA: Rio de Janeiro), 12–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Boseley (2008) ‘Tests Start on Pill That Could Lengthen Millions of Lives’, The Guardian, 29 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bradford (2012) ‘The Brussels Effect’, Northwestern University Law Review, 107(1), 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Braun (2009) ‘Brazil Exercises the Option to Say “No”’, Brown Journal of World Affairs (Spring/Summer), 15(2), 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Bretherton and J. Vogler (2008) The European Union as a Global Actor (2nd edn., Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges (2008) ‘TRIPS Council Once Again Marked by Divisions over Disclosure Amendment’, Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest, 12(10), 19 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Burris, R. Lazzarini and B. Loff (2001) ‘Are Human Rights Good for Your Health’, The Lancet, 358, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Chan, J. Store and B. Kouchner (2008) ‘Foreign Policy and Global Public Health: Working Together towards Common Goals’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(7), July.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission (2007) White Paper: Together for health: A strategic approach for the EU 2008–2013, COM (2007) 630 final, 23 October 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission (2009) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Pandemic (H1N1) 2009, COM (2009) 418 final, Brussels, 15 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Deacon (2013) Global Social Policy in the Making: The Foundations of the Social Protection Floor (Bristol: Policy Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • N. Ferguson (2010) ‘The End of the Euro: How the Crisis in Greece Could Lead to the Demise of Europe’s Most Ambitious Project’, Newsweek, 17 May, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Fuller (1964) The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Ganz (2009) ‘The Lawyer Who Fought the 377 Law and Won: Anand Grover’, Legally India, 17 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. L. Gardner and S. E. Eizenstat (2010) ‘New Treaty, New Influence? Europe’s Chance to Punch Its Weight,’ Foreign Affairs, 86(2), (March/April), 104–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Gostin (2009) ‘Fighting the Flu with One Hand Tied’, The Washington Post, 1 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Gostin (2010) ‘The Unconscionable Health Gap: A Global Plan for Justice’, The Lancet, 375, 1 May.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Hestermeyer (2008) Human Rights and the WTO: The Case of Patents and Access to Medicines (Oxford: OUP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • P. J. Hotez (2010) ‘A Plan to Defeat Neglected Tropical Diseases’, Scientific American, January 2010, 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. F. M. ‘t Hoen (2009) The Global Politics of Pharmaceutical Monopoly Power: Drug Patents, Access, Innovations and the Application of the WTO Doha Declaration on TRIPs and Public Health (Diemen: AMB).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Jetschke and P. Murray (2012) ‘Diffusing Regional Integration: The EU and Southeast Asia’, West European Politics, 35(1), 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Judt (2006) ‘Future of Decadent Europe’, US-Europe Analysis Series, Brookings Institution (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kingah and L. Van Langenhove (2012) ‘Determinants of a Regional Organization’s role in Peace and Security: Comparing the African Union and the European Union’, South African Journal of International Affairs, 19(2), August, 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Kirchner and R. Dominguez (2011) ‘Regional organisations and security governance,’ in E. J. Kirchner and R. Dominguez (eds.) The Security Governance of Regional Organizations (Routledge: Abingdon), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. D. Kristof (2010) ‘Winning the Worm War’, International Herald Tribune, 2 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Loff and M. Heywood (2002) ‘Patents on Drugs: Manufacturing Scarcity or Advancing Health?’, Journal of Law, Medicines and Ethics, 30, 621–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Malamud (2011) ‘A Leader without Followers? The Growing Divergence between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy’, Latin American Politics and Society, 53(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. F. Musungu (2006) ‘Benchmarking Progress in Tackling the Challenges of Intellectual Property, and Access to Medicines in Developing Countries’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(5), 366–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. F. Musungu (2008) ‘The TRIPS Agreement and public health’, in C. M. Correa and A. A. Yusuf (eds.), 2nd edn., Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement (New York: Kluwe Law International), 421–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Okediji (2007) ‘Securing intellectual property objectives: New approaches to human rights considerations’, in M. E. Salomon, A. Tostensen and W. Vandenhole (eds.) Casting the Net Wider: Human Rights, Development and New Duty-Bearers (Antwerp: Intersentia), 211–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pierce (2011) ‘A South American Energy Treaty: How the Region Might Attract Foreign Investment in the Wake of Resource Nationalism’, Cornell International Law Journal, 44, 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rifkin (2004) The European Dream: How Europe’s Vision of the Future is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream (New York: Putnam).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Riggirozzi (2012) ‘Regional Health Governance in South America: Redefining Regionalism and Regional Responsibilities’, Doctoral School Lecture, Quito, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Rott (2003) ‘The Doha Declaration — Good News for Public Health?’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 3, 284–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Sachs (2002) ‘Health Is a Key to Development’, The ACP-EU Courier, (March/April).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. N. Sampat (2009) ‘Ensuring Policy and Laws are Both Effective and Just: Academic Patents and Access to Medicines in Developing Countries’, American Journal of Public Health, 99/1, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Smith, C. Correa and C. Oh (2009) ‘Trade, TRIPs and Pharmaceuticals’, The Lancet, 373, 681–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Senior (2009) ‘Wanted: 2.4 Million Nurses, and That’s Just in India’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • TFEU (2010) Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ EU, 30.03.2010, C 83/47.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Tockman (2009) ‘The Rise of the Pink Tide: Trade Integration and Economic Crisis in Latin America’, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 10 (Summer/Fall), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Vilas (2008) ‘Turning to the Left? Understanding Some Unexpected Events in Latin America’, Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 9, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Vincent (2010) ‘Dernière Ligne droite pour un Vaccin Antipaludisme’, Le Monde, 27 mars.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. F. Wiley and L. O. Gostin (2009) ‘The International Response to Climate Change: An Agenda for Global Health’, Journal of American Medical Association, 302(11), September, 1218–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCSDG (2004) World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization (WCSDG) Report, A Fair Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All (Geneva: International Labour Organization).

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2002) WHO Regional Office for Africa, Health-for-all Policy for the 21st Century in the African Region: Agenda 2020, AFR/RC50/8REV.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Youngs (2010) Europe’s Decline and Fall: The Struggle against Global Irrelevance (London: Profile).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Luk Van Langenhove and Stephen Kingah

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Langenhove, L., Kingah, S. (2016). Conditions for Effective Regional Social (Health) Policies: The EU and Unasur Compared. In: Bianculli, A.C., Hoffmann, A.R. (eds) Regional Organizations and Social Policy in Europe and Latin America. Development, Justice and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490353_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490353_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57095-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49035-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics