Advertisement

The Politics of Legitimation in Post-Soviet Eurasia

Chapter

Abstract

The Eurasian successor states of the former Soviet Union hold regular elections, but few political regimes in the region meet democratic standards. Despite the color revolutions and subsequent protest movements, which have shown that the manipulation of elections entails considerable risks for incumbents, non-democratic arrangements of political rule have emerged and persist in many of the region’s states. In fact, most of these political regimes have survived public protests and other challenges or threats originating from elite disagreements, ethnic divisions and economic crises. The causes and conditions of this robustness, however, are not yet well understood among scholars.

Keywords

Political Institution Political Elite Authoritarian Regime Political Regime Authoritarian Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beetham, D. (1991) The Legitimation of Power (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beichelt, T. (2014) ‘Legitimer Autoritarismus. Politische Stabilität im postsowjetischen Raum’, Osteuropa, 64(8), 49–61.Google Scholar
  3. Bingham Powell, G. (2004) ‘The Chain of Responsiveness’, Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brancati, D. (2014) ‘Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects’, Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 313–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bueno de Mesquita, B. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  6. Burnell, P. (2006) ‘Autocratic Opening to Democracy: Why Legitimacy Matters’, Third World Quarterly, 27(4), 545–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, C. (2011) ‘Muddling Through the Shadow of the Past(s). Post-Communist Russia’s Search for a New Regime Ideology’, Demokratizatsiya, 19(1), 37–57.Google Scholar
  8. Easton, D. (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
  9. Elster, J., C. Offe and U. K. Preuss (1998) Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea (Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feklyunina, V. and S. White (2011) ‘Discourses of “Krizis”: Economic Crisis in Russia and Regime Legitimacy’, Journal of Communist Studies & Transition Politics, 27(3–4), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gandhi, J. (2008) Political Institutions under Dictatorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gandhi, J. and E. Lust-Okar (2009) ‘Elections Under Authoritarianism’, Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerschewski, J. (2013) ‘The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Cooptation in Autocratic Regimes’, Democratization, 20(1), 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilley, B. (2009) The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose Legitimacy (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Grauvogel, J. and C. von Soest (2014) ‘Claims to Legitimacy Count: Why Sanctions Fail to Instigate Democratisation in Authoritarian Regimes’, European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 635–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gudkov, L. (2014) ‘The Technology of Negative Mobilization’, Eurozine, 10 January 2014.Google Scholar
  17. Hale, H. E. (2005) ‘Regime Cycles. Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia’, World Politics, 58(2), 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holbig, H. (2013) ‘Ideology after the End of Ideology. China and the Quest for Autocratic Legitimation’, Democratization, 20(1), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmes, L. (1993) The End of Communist Power: Anti-Corruption Campaigns and Legitimation Crisis (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  20. Holmes, L. (2010) ‘Legitimation and Legitimacy in Russia Revisited’, in Fortescue, S. (ed.) Russian Politics. From Lenin to Putin (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 101–26.Google Scholar
  21. Holmes, L. (2015) ‘Comparative Conclusions: Legitimacy and Legitimation in Eurasian Post-communist States’, in Brusis, M., J. Ahrens and M. Schulze Wessel (eds) Politics and Legitimacy in Post-Soviet Eurasia (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 223–245.Google Scholar
  22. Huskey, E. (2010) ‘Elite Recruitment and State-Society Relations in Technocratic Authoritarian Regimes: The Russian Case’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(4), 363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huskey, E. (2013) ‘Legitimizing the Russian Executive: Identity, Technocracy, and Performance’, in Bodin, P.-A., S. Hedlund and E. Namli (eds) Power and Legitimacy — Challenges from Russia (London/New York: Routledge), 46–58.Google Scholar
  24. Kailitz, S. (2013) ‘Classifying Political Regimes Revisited: Legitimation and Durability’, Democratization, 20(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keane, J. (2013) Democracy and Media Decadence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levitsky, S. and L. A. Way (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linz, J. J. (2000) Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes (Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  28. Magaloni, B. (2008) ‘Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule’, Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 715–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magaloni, B. and R. Kricheli (2010) ‘Political Order and One-Party Rule’, Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  31. Matveeva, A. (2009) ‘Legitimising Central Asian Authoritarianism: Political Manipulation and Symbolic Power’, Europe-Asia Studies, 61(7), 1095–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morse, Y. L. (2012) ‘The Era of Electoral Authoritarianism’, World Politics, 64(1), 161–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Offe, C. (1996) ‘Designing Institutions in East European Transitions’, in Goodin, R. E. (ed.) The Theory of Institutional Design (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petrov, N., M. Lipman and H. E. Hale (2010) Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications of Hybrid Regimes. Carnegie Papers 106 (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment), http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/overmanaged_democracy_2.pdf, accessed 07/03/2015.
  35. Peregudov, S. P. (2012) ‘Koncepcii’a monitoringovoi’ demokratii: K novym otnosheniiam vlasti i obshchestva’, Politicheskie issledovaniia, 22(6), 55–67.Google Scholar
  36. Rigby, T. H. (1982) ‘Introduction: Political Legitimacy, Weber and Communist Monoorganisational Systems’, in Rigby, T. H. and F. Fehér (eds) Political Legitimation in Communist States (London: Macmillan), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rubtsov, A. (2014) ‘Summa legitimnosti’, Vestnik Evropy, (38–39), 41–52, http://www.vestnik-evropy.ru/issues/the-amount-of-legitimacy.html
  38. Sakwa, R. (2011) The Crisis of Russian Democracy. The Dual State, Factionalism and the Medvedev Succession (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  39. Scharpf, F. W. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schatz, E. (2006) ‘Access by Accident: Legitimacy Claims and Democracy Promotion in Authoritarian Central Asia’, International Political Science Review, 27(3), 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schedler, A. (2006) ‘The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism’, in Schedler, A. (ed.) Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition (Boulder: Lynne Rienner), 1–26.Google Scholar
  42. Schedler, A. (2013) The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schneider, S., A. Hurrelmann, Z. Krell-Laluhová, F. Nullmeier, and A. Wiesner (2010) Democracy’s Deep Roots. Why the Nation State Remains Legitimate (Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  44. Sil, R. and C. Chen (2004) ‘State Legitimacy and the (In)significance of Democracy in Post-Communist Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 56(3), 347–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stepan, A. and J. J. Linz (2013) ‘Democratization Theory and the “Arab Spring”’, Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Svolik, M. W. (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Timm, C. (2010) ‘Jenseits von Demokratiehoffnung und Autoritarismusverdacht: Eine herrschaftssoziologische Analyse post-transformatorischer Regime’, in Albrecht, H. and H. Frankenberger (eds) Autoritarismus reloaded. Neuere Ansätze und Erkenntnisse der Autokratieforschung (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 95–118.Google Scholar
  48. von Soest, C. and J. Grauvogel (2015) ‘Comparing Legitimation Strategies in Post-Soviet Countries’, in Brusis, M., J. Ahrens and M. Schulze Wessel (eds) Politics and Legitimacy in Post-Soviet Eurasia (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 18–46.Google Scholar
  49. Wintrobe, R. (1998) The Political Economy of Dictatorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zudin, A. (2001) ‘Neokorporativizm v Rossii? (Gosudarstvo ibiznes pri Vladimire Putine)’, Pro et Contra, 6(4), 171–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Brusis 2016

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations