Skip to main content
  • 1035 Accesses

Abstract

The early forms of corporate entities which emerged during the early 17th century in Europe were created to serve the common good, such as the building of hospitals and creation of orphanages. The concept of a commercial corporation in the UK was defined by an 1844 Act of Parliament. This permitted corporations to define their own purpose and activities. A second Act in 1854 gave shareholders limited liability that protected their personal assets from the consequences of the financial failure of a corporation. This legislation stimulated the emergence of business corporations in both England and Holland. In many of the existing trading companies, partners combined their personal assets and exchanged them for company shares in return for receiving relief from personal liability. This form of organisation gave corporations the added benefit of unlimited life and easy transferability of ownership (Grant, 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alano, K (2012) ‘Aktar Islam begins legal action for defamation against food blogger’, Caterer & Hotelkeeper, London, 29 June, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2008) ‘The principles for user generated content services: a middle ground approach to cyber-governance’, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 121 No. 5, pp. 1387–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2009) ‘Child pornography, the Internet and the challenge of updating statutory terms’, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 122 No. 8, pp. 2206–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, R. (2002) ‘International cyber-jurisdiction: a comparative analysis’, American Business Law Journal, Vol. 39, pp. 531–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balleste, R. (2011) ‘Persuasion and exhortations: acknowledging Internet governance and human dignity for all’, Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 228–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoli, E. (2009) ‘Children’s data protection vs marketing companies’, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 23 No. 1/2, pp. 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffett, W. (2002) ‘Who really cooks the books?’, The New York Times, 24 July, p. A19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. (2010) ‘Internet safety: Who will protect the children?’, Berkeley Technology Law, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 501–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheffins, B.R. (2001) ‘History and the global corporate governance revolution: the UK perspective begins’, Business History, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 87–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou, G. and Simpson, S. (2009) ‘New governance, the Internet, and country code top-level domains in Europe’, Governance, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 599–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranor, L.F. (1999) ‘Internet privacy’, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehue, F., C. Bolman and T. Vollink (2008) ‘Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception’, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 217–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlinger, J. and R. P. Eibach (2011) ‘Focalism and the failure to foresee unintended consequences’, Basic & Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finklea, K. (2010) ‘Identity theft: Trends and issues’, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, 10 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodno, N. H. (2011) ‘How public schools can constitutionally halt cyberbullying’, Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 641–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G.H. (2003) ‘The evolution of corporate governance and its impact on modern corporate America’, Management Decision, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 923–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. (2011) ‘Courtney Love’s $430,000 Tweets’, Forbes, New York, 4 March, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, M.A. (2010) ‘Court finds out-of-state blogger liable’, Business Insurance, New York, 21 June, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, M. and M. Lwin (2008) ‘An international perspective of online disclosure’, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 327–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Industry Canada (1998) ‘The Canadian Electronic Commerce Strategy’, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivan, I., D. Milodin and C. Sbora (2012) ‘Non security — Premise of cybercrime’, Theoretical & Applied Economics, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplin, W. A. and B. A. Lee (2009) A Legal Guide For Student Affairs Professionals (University of Syracuse Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kayhan, V. and A. Bhattacherjee (2013) ‘Content use from websites: Effects of governance mechanisms’, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, A. S. and K. Larsen (2009) ‘Shielding Jane and John: Can the media protect anonymous online speech?’, Commercial Law, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, P. and B. J. Cooper (2003) ‘The mad hatter’s corporate tea party’, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6/7, pp. 505–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, C., A. D. Prawitz, L. E. Derscheid and B. Motgomery (2011) ‘Perceived safety and teen risk taking in online chat sites’, Cyber Psychology, Behavior & Social Networking, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., O. C. Ferrell and G. T. Hult (1999) ‘Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 455–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, O. A. (1995) ‘Exonerating unethical marketing behaviors: A diagnostic framework’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, A. (2006) ‘Mobile phones and the Internet: Legal issues in the protection of children’, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 20 No. 1/2, pp. 177–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ourston, D., S. Matzner, W. Stump and B. Hopkins (2004) ‘Coordinated Internet attacks: responding to attack complexity’, Journal of Computer Security, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 165–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paré, D. J. (2003) Internet Governance in Transition: Who Is the Master of This Domain? (Illinois: Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, J. (2011) ‘Sustainable stakeholder capitalism: A moral vision of responsible global financial risk management’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 99, pp. 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, G. and S. Venkatesan (2010) ‘Cybercrime strategy for social networking and other online platforms’, Licensing Journal, Vol. 30 No. 7, pp. 23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., S. Leal and M. Pina e Cunha (2011) ‘Rethinking the employees’ perceptions of corporate citizenship dimensionalization’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 104, pp. 207–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satola, D. (2007) ‘Legal aspects of Internet governance reform’, The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, Vol. 12 No. 1/2, pp. 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaaper, M. (2008) ‘Measuring security and trust in the online environment’, Industry for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 29 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seounmi, Y. (2008) ‘Parental influence and teens’ attitude toward online privacy protection’, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 362–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. M., R. J. Aaalberts and S. A. Gibson (2000) ‘Libel and slander on the Internet’, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, C. and C. L. Roszkowski (1999) ‘Legal aspects of corporate governance in early American railroads’, Business and Economic History, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 325–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, J. (2007) ‘Plurilateral governance in the enlarged European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Ian Chaston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaston, I. (2015). Online Governance. In: Internet Marketing and Big Data Exploitation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137488961_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics