Abstract
At the height of the 2014 US midterm elections, the Pew Research Center published a report on polarization in the American public (Dimock, Doherty, Kiley, & Oates, 2014). In their report, they argued that ideological division and party antipathy between Democrats and Republicans is higher now than at any point in the past few decades. Though political science has long debated whether ideological polarization is on the rise (Abramowitz, 2010; Fiorina, Abrams, & Pope, 2011), Iyengar, Sood, and Lelkes (2012) have demonstrated a rise in affective polarization, or the extent to which feeling (affect) toward candidates and political parties is separating such that people increasingly like their own party and dislike (or even hate) the opponent. A great deal of research has demonstrated the role of partisan media in fostering polarization (Feldman, Myers, Hmielowski, & Leiserowitz, 2014; Garrett et al., 2014; Levendusky, 2013; Stroud, 2010), and some have examined the effects of campaign communication on affective polarization (Iyengar et al., 2012; Warner & Greenwood, 2014; Warner & McKinney, 2013). However, as with much of political communication research, these studies have neglected midterm and down-ballot elections. This chapter offers a corrective to this by exploring the role of political communication in three hotly contested campaigns for the US Senate in the 2014 midterm elections. Residents of Iowa, North Carolina, and Georgia were surveyed to assess the relationships among political communication, political interest, political confidence, and affective polarization toward the candidates for US Senate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abramowitz, A. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Binder, A. R., Dalrymple, K. E., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). The soul of a polarized democracy: Testing theoretical linkages between talk and attitude extremity during the 2004 presidential election. Communication Research, 36, 315–340. doi:10.1177/0093650209333023
Dilliplane, S. (2011). All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 287–316. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr006
Dimock, M., Doherty, C., Kiley, J., & Oates, R. (2014). Political polarization in the American public. Pew Research Center for People and the Press. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/6-12-2014-Political-Polarization-Release.pdf
Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Hmielowski, J. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication, 64, 590–611. doi:10.1111/jcom.12108
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2011). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676–699. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro- and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization: Partisan media exposure and affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40, 309–332. doi:10.1111/hcre.12028
Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64, 680–701. doi:10.1111/jcom.12105
Geer, J. G. (2010). Fanning the flames: The news media’s role in the rise of negativity in presidential campaigns. Discussion paper, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy, Harvard University.
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204–222. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038
Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C. (2007). Political information efficacy and young voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1093–1111. doi:10.1177/000276420730004
Kaid, L. L., Tedesco, J. C., & McKinney, M. S. (2004). Political information efficacy and younger voters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., & Westerwick, A. (2014). Confirmation bias in online searches: Impacts of selective exposure before an election on political attitude strength and shifts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12105
Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 786–802.
Levendusky, M. S. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers? American Journal of Political Science, 57, 611–623. doi:10.1111/ajps.12008
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McKinney, M. S., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2007). Political engagement through debates: Young citizens’ reactions to the 2004 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1169–1182. doi:10.1177/000276420730005
McKinney, M. S., & Rill, L. A. (2009). Not your parents’ presidential debates: Examining the effects of the CNN/YouTube debates on young citizens’ civic engagement. Communication Studies, 60, 392–406. doi:10.1080/10510970903110001
McKinney, M. S., & Warner, B. R. (2013). Do presidential debates matter? Examining a decade of campaign debate effects. Argumentation and Advocacy, 49, 238–258.
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
Rosenstone, S. J., Kinder, D. R., & Miller, W. E. (1997). American National Election Studies. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Political Studies/Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, University of Michigan.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556–576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
Tajfel, H. (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96
Warner, B. R., & Greenwood, M. (2014). Affective polarization from campaign communication: Alienating messages in the 2012 presidential election. In J. Tedesco, D. B. Bystrom, M. S. McKinney, & M. C. Banwart (Eds.), Alienation: The divide and conquer election of 2012. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Warner, B. R., & McKinney, M. S. (2013). The polarizing effect of presidential debates. Communication Studies, 64, 1–20. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.832341
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 Freddie J. Jennings, Rocío Galarza, and Benjamin R. Warner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jennings, F.J., Galarza, R., Warner, B.R. (2016). Political Communication and Affective Polarization in the 2014 Midterm Elections for the US Senate: The Cases of Iowa, North Carolina, and Georgia. In: Hendricks, J.A., Schill, D. (eds) Communication and Midterm Elections. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137488015_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137488015_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55663-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48801-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)