Abstract
Discussion of mock-heroic verse has focused predominantly on the works of Augustan male poets, with Anna Laetitia Barbauld’s ‘Washing Day’ (1797), arguably, being the most widely analysed female-authored example of this mode.1 Attention on this poem, and its supplication to the ‘domestic Muse’, can be attributed to the recent critical interest in the ‘poeticising [of] the domestic’ and, as Adeline Johns-Putra considers, ‘the way in which so much of […] [the] work [of late eighteenth-century women poets] foregrounds, even celebrates, the homely, the private and, as such, the resolutely un-poetic’.2 From the early 1700s, though, Jane Spencer notes that women were coming up against ‘a new ideology of femininity’ which meant that ‘women were more highly valued [than in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries], but also more confined to a special feminine sphere, as guardians of the home and of moral and emotional values’.3 Despite this sense of restriction, Paula Backscheider stresses that ‘women were writing all of the kinds of poetry that men were’ and, throughout the century, female poets, such as Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Elizabeth Thomas, Mary Jones, Sarah Dixon and Anna Seward, were employing the mock-heroic to explore a variety of themes, including illness and the loss of beauty it can cause (Montagu in ‘Saturday: The Small-Pox’ [wr. 1716; pub. 1747]), false lovers (Dixon in ‘Cloe to Aminta.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
I refer to the mock-heroic as a ‘mode’ rather than a ‘genre’, drawing on a point made by Richard Terry (himself drawing on Alastair Fowler). He writes: ‘Most previous criticism has tended to see mock-heroic as a genre, a distinct category of work, not as a fugitive “effect” flickering to life in a variety of contexts. Yet this is one of the directions in which mock-heroic evolves in the eighteenth century; indeed it is a mark of its full absorption in the literary culture of its day. This phenomenon is one that conforms to the process outlined by Alastair Fowler, by which a high-level “kind” devolves over time into a “mode”, figuring, that is, as a building-block or flavouring within a more encompassing form, a destiny that in the eighteenth century can be seen as already having overtaken older forms such as the epigram or character.’ See R. Terry (2005) Mock-Heroic: Butler to Cowper (Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate), p. 26.
A. L. Barbauld (1990) ‘Washing Day’ in R. Lonsdale (ed.) Eighteenth-Century Women Poets: An Oxford Anthology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 308–10, line 3;
A. Johns-Putra (2010) ‘Satire and Domesticity in Late Eighteenth-Century Women’s Poetry’, Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 33:1, 67–87 (pp. 67, 68).
For biographical pieces on Mary Jones, see Lonsdale, Eighteenth Century Women Poets, pp. 155–6; D. Fairer and C. Gerrard (2015) Eighteenth-Century Poetry: An Annotated Anthology, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell), p. 361; R. Greene (rev. W. R. Jones) (2009) ‘Jones, Mary (1707–1778), poet’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, online at: www.oxforddnb.com [accessed 14 September 2014].
M. Jones (2015) ‘Elegy, On a Favourite Dog, suppos’d to be poison’d’ in Eighteenth-Century Poetry: An Annotated Anthology, pp. 368–70, lines 3 and 9. Further line references are to this edition and are given in parentheses following the quotation.
A. Pope (1962) The Rape of the Lock: An Heroi-Comical Poem in G. Tillotson (ed.) The Twickenham Edition of the Poems of Alexander Pope, Vol II, 3rd edn (London: Methuen), pp. 127–206, I. 115–16.
See C. Frayling (2009) Horace Walpole’s Cat (London: Thames & Hudson). On p. 27, Frayling notes the different names used for the poem.
(1755) ‘A Gentleman having read the foregoing Verses, ask’d what Reason could be given for Phoebus interesting himself in the Affair? This Question occasion’d the following Lines’ in Familiar Letters and Poems on Several Occasions, pp. 253–8 (p. 255). Further page references are to this edition and are given in parentheses following the quotation. See entries on ‘Thalia’ and ‘Calliope’ in E. Knowles (2005) The Oxford Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 713, 116.
E. Thomas, ‘Jill. A Pindarick Ode’ in Miscellany Poems on Several Subjects, pp. 192–6 (p. 192). Further page references are to this edition and are given in parentheses following the quotation (an extract of this poem is available in Eighteenth-Century Women Poets, p. 42). J. B. Holberg (2007) Sirius: Brightest Diamond in the Night Sky (Berlin, New York and Chichester: Springer), p. 15.
E. Spenser (2013) The Shepheardes Calendar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), Julye, pp. 37–44 (p. 37).
Reference found via G. Noonan (1990) Fixed Stars and Judicial Astrology (Washington: American Federation of Astrologers), p. 66.
See Lonsdale, Eighteenth-Century Women Poets; P. R. Backscheider and C. E. Ingrassia (eds) (2009) British Women Poets of the Long Eighteenth Century: An Anthology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press);
J. Fullard (ed.) (1990) British Women Poets, 1660–1780: An Anthology (New York: Whitston Publishing Company).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Joanna Fowler
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fowler, J. (2015). Women Poets and the Mock-Heroic Elegy. In: Fowler, J., Ingram, A. (eds) Voice and Context in Eighteenth-Century Verse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137487636_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137487636_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58029-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48763-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)