Skip to main content

Using the Narrative Policy Framework to Understand Stakeholder Strategy and Effectiveness: A Multi-Case Analysis

  • Chapter
The Science of Stories

Abstract

Understanding stakeholder strategies and effectiveness are key components in an analysis of policy change and policy coalition dynamics. The narrative policy framework (NPF) provides a mechanism for systematically analyzing these elements of the policy process. Using a multi-case study of stakeholder communication in environmental policy making, this study analyzes stakeholder narrative strategy, effectiveness, and framing of winners and losers. This chapter empirically tests several NPF meso-level hypotheses using a multi-case research design, a methodological approach new to NPF research. This research design moves beyond single-case analysis of narratives by varying cases by policy issues (water supply and energy), policy venues (legislation versus regulation), and policy positions (policy winners and losers).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baumgartner, Frank R. and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R. and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Charles. 2012. “The Politics of ‘Fracking’: Regulating Natural Gas Drilling Practices in Colorado and Texas.” Review of Policy Research 29:177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fracturer Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43:51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, Dominic, Sheldon Krimsky, and Alonzo Plough. 1992. “Evaluating Risk Communication: Narrative Vs. Technical Presentations of Information About Radon.” Risk Analysis 12:27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila, Tanya, Jonathan Pierce, Samuel Gallaher, Jennifer Kagan, Deserai A. Crow, and Christoper M. Weible. 2014. “Understanding a Period of Policy Change: The Case of Hydraulic Fracturing Disclosure Policy in Colorado.” Review of Policy Research 31:65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Bryan D. and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael D. 2013. “Cultural Characters and Climate Change: How Heroes Shape Our Perception of Climate Science.” Social Science Quarterly:1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael D. 2010. Heroes and Villains: Cultural Narratives, Mass Opinions, and Climate Change. University of Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael D. and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 2009. “Tran-Subsystem Dynamics: Policy Topography, Mass Opinion, and Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 37:37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael D. and Mark K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?.” Policy Studies Journal 38:329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Second edition. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, William D. and Paul A. Sabatier. 2005. “Are Trust and Social Capital the Keys to Success?.” In Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, Mark K., Donna L. Lybecker, and Kacee A. Garner. 2010a. “The Story of Good Citizenship: Framing Public Policy in the Context of Duty-Based Versus Engaged Citizenship.” Politics & Polity 38:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Ruth J. Arnell, and Paul L. Hathaway. 2007. “The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory.” Policy Studies Journal 35:87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, and Michael D. Jones. 2005. “The Science of Storytelling: Measuring Policy Beliefs in Greater Yellowstone.” Society & Natural Resources 18:413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Linda E. Tigert, Paul L. Hathaway, and Lynnette J. Sampson. 2010b. “Buffalo Tales: Interest Group Policy Stories and Tactics in Greater Yellowstone.” Policy Sciences 43:391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Molly Anderson, and Barbara Rose. 2012. “Policy Story or Gory Story? Narrative Policy Framework, YouTube, and Indirect Lobbying in Greater Yellowstone.” Policy & Internet 4(34):159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Martin. 2003. “Drivers of Natural Resource-Based Political Conflict.” Policy Sciences 36:307–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. “Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” In Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A. 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A., Susan Hunter, and Susan McLaughlin. 1987. “The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents.” Western Political Quarterly 40:449–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A. and Hank Jenkins-Smith. 1999. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework.” In Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, Dietram A. 2009. “Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication.” Mass Communication and Society 3:297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, Dietram A. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49:104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Michael D. Jones, and Mark K. McBeth. 2011a. “Policy Narratives and Policy Processes.” Policy Studies Journal 39:535–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, and Ross R. Lane. 2013. “An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities.” Policy Studies Journal 41:453–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Mark K. McBeth, and Paul L. Hathaway. 2011b. “Narrative Policy Framework: The Influence of Media Policy Narrative on Public Opinion.” Politics & Polity 39:373–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Deborah. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible, Christopher M. 2008. “Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis.” Policy Studies Journal 36:615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Michael D. Jones Elizabeth A. Shanahan Mark K. McBeth

Copyright information

© 2014 Michael D. Jones, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, and Mark K. McBeth

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crow, D.A., Berggren, J. (2014). Using the Narrative Policy Framework to Understand Stakeholder Strategy and Effectiveness: A Multi-Case Analysis. In: Jones, M.D., Shanahan, E.A., McBeth, M.K. (eds) The Science of Stories. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137485861_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics