Abstract
Understanding stakeholder strategies and effectiveness are key components in an analysis of policy change and policy coalition dynamics. The narrative policy framework (NPF) provides a mechanism for systematically analyzing these elements of the policy process. Using a multi-case study of stakeholder communication in environmental policy making, this study analyzes stakeholder narrative strategy, effectiveness, and framing of winners and losers. This chapter empirically tests several NPF meso-level hypotheses using a multi-case research design, a methodological approach new to NPF research. This research design moves beyond single-case analysis of narratives by varying cases by policy issues (water supply and energy), policy venues (legislation versus regulation), and policy positions (policy winners and losers).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Davis, Charles. 2012. “The Politics of ‘Fracking’: Regulating Natural Gas Drilling Practices in Colorado and Texas.” Review of Policy Research 29:177–191.
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fracturer Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43:51–59.
Golding, Dominic, Sheldon Krimsky, and Alonzo Plough. 1992. “Evaluating Risk Communication: Narrative Vs. Technical Presentations of Information About Radon.” Risk Analysis 12:27–35.
Heikkila, Tanya, Jonathan Pierce, Samuel Gallaher, Jennifer Kagan, Deserai A. Crow, and Christoper M. Weible. 2014. “Understanding a Period of Policy Change: The Case of Hydraulic Fracturing Disclosure Policy in Colorado.” Review of Policy Research 31:65–87.
Jones, Bryan D. and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, Michael D. 2013. “Cultural Characters and Climate Change: How Heroes Shape Our Perception of Climate Science.” Social Science Quarterly:1–38.
Jones, Michael D. 2010. Heroes and Villains: Cultural Narratives, Mass Opinions, and Climate Change. University of Oklahoma.
Jones, Michael D. and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 2009. “Tran-Subsystem Dynamics: Policy Topography, Mass Opinion, and Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 37:37–58.
Jones, Michael D. and Mark K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?.” Policy Studies Journal 38:329–353.
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Second edition. New York: Longman.
Krippendorf, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Leach, William D. and Paul A. Sabatier. 2005. “Are Trust and Social Capital the Keys to Success?.” In Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 233–258.
McBeth, Mark K., Donna L. Lybecker, and Kacee A. Garner. 2010a. “The Story of Good Citizenship: Framing Public Policy in the Context of Duty-Based Versus Engaged Citizenship.” Politics & Polity 38:1–23.
McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Ruth J. Arnell, and Paul L. Hathaway. 2007. “The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory.” Policy Studies Journal 35:87–108.
McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, and Michael D. Jones. 2005. “The Science of Storytelling: Measuring Policy Beliefs in Greater Yellowstone.” Society & Natural Resources 18:413–429.
McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Linda E. Tigert, Paul L. Hathaway, and Lynnette J. Sampson. 2010b. “Buffalo Tales: Interest Group Policy Stories and Tactics in Greater Yellowstone.” Policy Sciences 43:391–409.
McBeth, Mark K., Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Molly Anderson, and Barbara Rose. 2012. “Policy Story or Gory Story? Narrative Policy Framework, YouTube, and Indirect Lobbying in Greater Yellowstone.” Policy & Internet 4(34):159–183.
Nie, Martin. 2003. “Drivers of Natural Resource-Based Political Conflict.” Policy Sciences 36:307–341.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. “Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” In Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, Paul A. 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, Paul A., Susan Hunter, and Susan McLaughlin. 1987. “The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents.” Western Political Quarterly 40:449–476.
Sabatier, Paul A. and Hank Jenkins-Smith. 1999. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework.” In Paul A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Scheufele, Dietram A. 2009. “Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication.” Mass Communication and Society 3:297–316.
Scheufele, Dietram A. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49:104–122.
Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Michael D. Jones, and Mark K. McBeth. 2011a. “Policy Narratives and Policy Processes.” Policy Studies Journal 39:535–561.
Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, and Ross R. Lane. 2013. “An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities.” Policy Studies Journal 41:453–483.
Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Mark K. McBeth, and Paul L. Hathaway. 2011b. “Narrative Policy Framework: The Influence of Media Policy Narrative on Public Opinion.” Politics & Polity 39:373–400.
Stone, Deborah. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: Norton.
Weible, Christopher M. 2008. “Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis.” Policy Studies Journal 36:615–635.
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Michael D. Jones, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, and Mark K. McBeth
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crow, D.A., Berggren, J. (2014). Using the Narrative Policy Framework to Understand Stakeholder Strategy and Effectiveness: A Multi-Case Analysis. In: Jones, M.D., Shanahan, E.A., McBeth, M.K. (eds) The Science of Stories. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137485861_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137485861_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47521-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48586-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)