Abstract
Schjoedt and Sangboon hold a positivist ideology. In this chapter they discuss an important aspect of the unit of analysis strategy in research designs: How does one account for or control factors that the researcher is aware of in the model but are beyond the focus of a within-groups or between-groups comparison? In other words, control factors are confounding, moderating, or mediating variables. The reason it is important to identify and control (or account for) these factors is so that the researcher can generalize to other populations, that is, by identifying the confounding factors that are present but are beyond the unit of analysis interest. When participants are samples for a between-group unit of analysis comparison, individual attributes in each participant often differ. Designing control variables is one approach among others to address this.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atinc, G., Simmering, M. J., & Kroll, M. J. (2012). Control variable use and reporting in macro and micromanagement research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 57–74.
Austin, J. T., Scherbaum, C. A., & Mahlman, R. A. (2002). History of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 3–33). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational R esearch Methods, 8(1), 274–289.
Breaugh, J. A. (2006). Rethinking the control of nuisance variables in theory testing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(1), 429–443.
Breaugh, J. A. (2008). Important considerations in using statistical procedures to control for nuisance variables in non-experimental studies. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 282–293.
Carlson, K. D. & Wu, J. (2012). The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 413–435.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavior sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
D’Andrade, R., & Dart, J. (1990). The interpretation of R versus R2 or why percent of variance accounted for is a poor measure of effect size. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 2(1), 47–59.
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results; An investigation of prevalence and effect. Organizational Research Methods, 1(2), 374–406.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ketchen, D., Boyd, B., & Bergh, D. (2008). Research methodology in strategic management: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 643–658.
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(2), 173–181.
Meehl, P. E. (1970). Nuisance variables and the ex post facto design. In M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Analyses of theories and methods of physics and psychology (pp. 373–402). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Meehl, P. E. (1971). High school yearbooks: A reply to Schwarz. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77(4), 143–148.
Newcombe, N. S. (2003). Some controls control too much. Child Development, 74(1), 1050–1052.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. G., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 879–903.
Schjoedt, L. (2013). The influence of work-and-family conflict on male entrepreneurs’ life satisfaction: A comparison of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 26(1), 45–64.
Schjoedt, L. & Bird, B. (2014). Control variables: Use, misuse, and recommended use. In A. Carsrud & M. E. Brännback (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in entrepreneurship and small business (pp. 136–155). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Schwab, D. B. (2005). Research methods for organizational studies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 3–43.
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organization research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(1), 221–232.
Spector, P. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 287–305.
Spector, P. E., Zapf, D., Chen, P. Y., & Frese, M. (2000). Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 79–95.
Stone-Romero, E. F. (2007). Non-experimental designs. In S. Rogelberg (Ed.), The encyclo-pedia of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 519–522). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Kenneth D. Strang
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schjoedt, L., Sangboon, K. (2015). Control Variables: Problematic Issues and Best Practices. In: Strang, K.D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Research Design in Business and Management. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484956_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484956_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47906-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48495-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)