Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

National End-of-Life Care Policy in the English Context: The Problem and Solution to Death and Dying

  • Chapter
Death and Social Policy in Challenging Times

Abstract

The End of Life Care Strategy (EOLCS) was released by the Department of Health (DoH) in July 2008 to promote and reform the way dying persons are cared for by focusing on patient needs and preferences (DoH, 2008b).1 The policy is considered the first of its kind, both nationally and internationally, for systematically addressing end-of-life care (EOLC) in a way that is not intended to be disease-focused, using an integrated framework for the managed care of the dying via the EOLC pathway outlined in the document. The EOLCS draws on a history of palliative and hospice care within the United Kingdom (Ellis et al. in this volume; Seymour, 2012) and is one of the reasons the UK is considered to be world-leading in EOLC provision (EIU, 2010). This chapter builds on the previous chapter by describing the discourses used within this policy arena to frame death and dying as a problem that can be solved through the implementation of EOLC within a neoliberal, and yet nationally funded health service, framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barclay, S. and Arthur, A. (2008) ‘Place of death: how much does it matter? The priority is to improve end-of-life care in all settings,’ The British Journal of General Practice: the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 58(549), pp. 229–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, S. et al. (2011) ‘End-of-Life care conversations with heart failure patients: A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis,’ British Journal of General Practice, 61(582), pp. e49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2010) ‘People “denied” die at home wish,’ BBC News. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11742166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellier, I. (2005) ‘Anthropology of institutions and discourse analysis: Looking into interdisciplinarity,’ in R. Wodak and P. A. Chilton (eds) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis Theory Methodology and Interdisciplinarity (Philadelphia: John Benjamins), pp. 243–67.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borgstrom, E. (2014) Planning for Death? An Ethnographic Study of English End-of-Life Care (Cambridge: University of Cambridge). Available at: http://www.repositorycam.ac.uk/handle/1810/245560.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Social Attitudes Survey (2012) Dying. Available at: http://www.dyingmatters.org/sites/default/files/BSA30_Full_Report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunton, R., Nettleton, S. and Burrows, R. (1995) The Sociology of Health Promotion: Critical Analyses of Consumption, Lifestyle and Risk (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, J. et al. (2014) ‘Care plans and care planning in long-term conditions: a conceptual model,’ Primary Health Care Research and Development, 15(4), 342–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T. J., Hicks-Moore, S. and Montgomery, P. (2011) ‘What’s so big about the “little things”: A phenomenological inquiry into the meaning of spiritual care in dementia,’ Dementia, 10(3), pp. 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and Deliens, L. (2012) ‘Applying a public health perspective to end of life care,’ in J. Cohen and L. Deliens (eds) A Public Health Perspective on End of Life Care, pp. 3–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2001) The NHS Cancer Plan (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2003) Choice, Responsiveness and Equity in the NHS and Social Care: A National Consultation (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2008a) ‘£268 m to improve end of life care for all’ (press release).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2008b) End of Life Care Strategy (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2008c) End of Life Care Strategy: Equality Impact Assessment (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2008d) End of Life Care Strategy: Executive Summary (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2008e) End of Life Care Strategy: Impact Assessment (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2008f) End of Life Care Strategy: What the End of Life Care Strategy Means for Patients and Carers (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2009) End of Life Care Strategy: First Annual Report (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Department of Health (2010) Supporting Australians to Live Well at the End of Life: The National Palliative Care Strategy (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2011) End of Life Care Strategy: Third Annual Report (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2012) End of Life Care Strategy: Fourth Annual Report (London: Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • DHSSPSNI (2010) Living Matters, Dying Matters: A Palliative and End of Life Care Strategy for Adults in Northern Ireland (Belfast: DHSSPSNI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. et al. (2015) Equity in the Provision of Palliative Care in the UK: Review of Evidence, London. Available at: www.pssru.ac.uk/publication-details.php?id=4962

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit (2010) The Quality of Death: Ranking End-of-Life Care Across the World (Economist Intelligence Unit: London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellershaw, J. and Murphy, D. (2011) ‘What Is the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient (LCP)?,’ in J. Ellershaw and S. Wilkinson (eds) Care of the Dying: A Pathway to Excellence (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, K. and Maher, L. (2010) High Impact Actions for Nursing and Midwifery (Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement).

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, D. and Addington-Hall, J. (1999) ‘Extending specialist palliative care to all?,’ Social Science and Medicine, 48(9), 1271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (2007) A Caring Society? Care and the Dilemmas of Human Service in the Twenty-First Century (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A. and Reid Keene, J. (2009) Death and Dying in America (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R. (2013) Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (London: The Stationery Office). Available at: http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, P. J. et al. (2000) ‘The level of need for palliative care: a systematic review of the literature,’ Palliative Medicine, 14(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, I. (2011) ‘Neoliberal Agency,’ Current Anthropology, 52(4), 537–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1965) Awareness of Dying (Chicago: Aldine).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, B., Calanzani, N. and Higginson, I.J. (2012) ‘Reversal of the British trends in place of death: time series analysis 2004–2010,’ Palliative Medicine, 26(2), 102–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, B. and Higginson, I.J. (2008) ‘Where people die (1974–2030): past trends, future projections and implications for care,’ Palliative Medicine, 22(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greener, I. (2009) ‘Towards a history of choice in UK health policy,’ Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(3), 309–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haga, K. et al. (2012) ‘Identifying community based chronic heart failure patients in the last year of life: a comparison of the Gold Standards Framework Prognostic Indicator Guide and the Seattle Heart Failure Model,’ Heart (British Cardiac Society), 98(7), 579–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C. (2014) Reforming the NHS from Within: Beyond Hierarchy, Inspection and Markets (London: Kingsfund).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. et al. (2014) Pathways through Care at the End of Life (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginson, I. J. (1999) ‘Evidence based palliative care,’ BMJ, 319(7208), 462–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houben, C. H. et al. (2014) ‘Efficacy of Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,’ Journal of American Medical Directors Association, 15(7), 477–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Health Committee (2008) NHS Next Stage Review (Volume 1) (London: House of Commons Health Committee).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Hallett, T, Craft, A. and Davies, C. (2011) Palliative Care Funding Review: Funding the Right Care and Support for Everyone. Is accessed at http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cmg42/resources/non-guidance-guide-for-commissioners-on-end-of-life-care-for-adults-pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • James Lind Alliance (2015) Palliative and End of Life Care Fop 10 Research Priorities. Available at: http://www.lindalliance.org/top-tens.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. R. (2005) … And a Time to Die: How American Hospitals Shape the End of Life (New York: A Lisa Drew Book/Scribner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellehear, A. (2012) Compassionate Cities (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingfisher, C. and Maskovsky, J. (2008) ‘Introduction: the Limits of Neoliberalism,’ Critique of Anthropology, 28, 115–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. and Garber, J. (2010) ‘To Allow People the Deaths They Want, End of Life Care Must Be Radically Fransformed …’: Dying for Change (London: Demos).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People (2014) One Chance to Get It Right: Improving People’s Experience of Care in the Last Few Days and Hours of Life. Available at: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/323188/One_chance_to_get_it_right.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaden, S. (2011) ‘Moving toward a national policy on palliative and end of life care,’ Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 17(Suppl), S42–S44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, L. and Duffy, A. (2008) ‘Holistic practice — a concept analysis,’ Nurse education in practice, 8(6), 412–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2008) The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, R. (2002) The Imaginary Time Bomb: Why an Ageing Population Is Not a Social Problem (New York: I.B.Tauris).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (2008) End of Life Care (London: National Audit Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Economic Development Office/Training Agency (1989) Defusing the Demographic Time Bomb (London: National Economic Development Office/Training Agency).

    Google Scholar 

  • NEOLCIN: National End of Life Care Intelligence Network (2013) What We Know Now 2013: New Information Collated by the National End of Life Care Intelligence Network (London: NEOLCIN).

    Google Scholar 

  • NICE: National Institute for Clinical Evidence (2011) Quality Standard for End of Life Care (London: National Institute for Clinical Evidence).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, J. et al. (2013) More Care, Less Pathway: A Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway (London: Independent Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway; Crown).

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS England (2014a) Actions for End of Life Care: 2014–2016 (London: NHS England).

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS England (2014b) Developing a New Approach to Palliative Care Funding: a First Draft for Discussion (London: NHS England).

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of National Statistics (2014) National Survey of Bereaved People (VOICES), 2013 Statistical Bulletin. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/subnational-healthl/national-survey-of-bereaved-people-voices-/2014/stb-voices-2014.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J. (2012) ‘Creating an impersonal NHS? Personalization, choice and the erosion of intimacy,’ Health Expectations, 18(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. and Grande, G. (2013) ‘Towards better support for family carers: a richer understanding,’ Palliative Medicine, 27(7), 579–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. et al. (2012) ‘The perspectives of bereaved family carers on dying at home: the study protocol of “unpacking the home: family carers” reflections on dying at home,’ BMC Palliative Care, 11(1), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett, L. (2004) ‘Local Autonomy, Local Democracy and the “New Localism”,’ Political Studies, 52(2), 358–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, F. and Downie, R.S. (2010) End of Life Choices: Consensus and Controversy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. (2008) ‘The end of life care strategy: Promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life,’ Presentation for End of Life Care Strategy. Available at: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/136445/EOLC_strategy_presentation.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riles, A. (2006) ‘Introduction: In Response,’ in A. Riles (ed.) Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press), pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. (2008) ‘A strategy for end of life care in the UK,’ BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 337(jul23_2), p. a943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. (2006) Cicely Saunders: Selected Writings 1958–2004 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government (2008) Living and Dying Well: A National Action Plan for Palliative and End of Life Care in Scotland (Edinburgh: Scottish Government).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, J. (1999) ‘Revisiting medicalisation and “natural” death,’ Social Science and Medicine, 49(5), 691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, J. (2012) ‘Looking back, looking forward: the evolution of palliative and end-of-life care in England,’ Mortality, 17(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, J., French, J., and Richardson, E. (2010) ‘Dying matters: Let’s talk about it,’ British Medical Journal, 341, 646–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spijker, J. and MacInnes, J. (2013) ‘Population ageing: the timebomb that isn’t?’ BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 347(nov12_1), p. f6598.

    Google Scholar 

  • TCEOLCPB: The Choice in End of Life Care Programme Board (2015) What’s Important to Me: A Review of Choice in End of Life Care (London: TCEOLCPB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. and Lobo, B. (2011) Advance Care Planning in End of Life Care (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S. and Epstein, S. (2010) ‘A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization,’ Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss, F. (1998). ‘Analysing Discourse,’ in C. Seale (ed) Researching Society and Culture (London: Sage), pp. 245–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerbeek, L. et al. (2008) ‘The effect of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying: a multi-centre study,’ Palliative Medicine, 22(2), 145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, J., Philipson, C. and Downs, M. (2006) The Futures of Old Age (Oxford: SAGE Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. (2004) ‘Is there such a thing as a good death?’ Palliative Medicine, 18, 404–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wee, B. (2014) Actions for End of Life Care: 2014–2015 (London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Erica Borgstrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sheffield, UK

    Liam Foster (Lecturer in Social Work) (Lecturer in Social Work)

  2. University of Bath, UK

    Kate Woodthorpe (Senior Lecturer in Sociology) (Senior Lecturer in Sociology)

Copyright information

© 2016 Erica Borgstrom

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borgstrom, E. (2016). National End-of-Life Care Policy in the English Context: The Problem and Solution to Death and Dying. In: Foster, L., Woodthorpe, K. (eds) Death and Social Policy in Challenging Times. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484901_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484901_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55799-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48490-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation