Abstract
Humour is frequently present in Mansfield’s short stories (as it is in her personal writing and letters), yet this is one aspect of her writing continually glossed over by many of her critics. She displays in her narrative art, wit, metaphorical flair, psychological subtlety and incisive phrasing in order to capture the nuances of consciousness and the duplicities of society. During her lifetime she was renowned for being an amusing companion, raconteur and mimic; many years after her death, Leonard Woolf remarked of her, ‘I don’t think anyone has ever made me laugh more than she did in those days’.1 In her fiction, the comedic side of her personality is used to great effect — and is present in almost every mature story. Katherine Anne Porter was a rare, early Mansfieldian critic who understood the importance of Mansfield’s use of humour, noting in 1937: ‘She possessed, for it is in her work, a real gaiety and a natural sense of comedy; there were many sides to her that made her able to perceive and convey in her stories a sense of human beings living on many planes at once, with all the elements justly ordered and in right proportion. This is a great gift’.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Leonard Woolf, Beginning Again: An Autobiography of the Years 1911–1918 (New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, 1964), p. 203. Stead refers to this quotation when talking of the humour in Mansfield’s first collection of stories, In a German Pension: ‘It is not, as it once seemed, an anti-German book so much as an anti-male book — but not quite simply anti-male either. It is full of that subtle humour, that dead-pan presentation of absurdities, which characterised Katherine Mansfield’s talk and letters and made her seem to Leonard Woolf the most amusing conversationalist he had ever known’ (in Pilditch, pp. 156–7).
Anne Olivier Bell, ed., The Diary of Virginia Woolf. Vol. 2, 1920–1924 (London: Hogarth, 1978), p. 125.
Mary Burgan, Illness, Gender and Writing: The Case of Katherine Mansfield (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), p. 165. Irene Simon asserts, ‘Irony is close to sarcasm. In a broader sense it refers to a “conflict between appearance and reality”. As such it is nearer to Socratic irony and implies disguise or deception, whether as flattery, condemnation, or reserve’. Irene Simon, ‘Irony in the Short Stories of Katherine Mansfield’, in Dupuis and Michel, p. 98.
Copyright information
© 2015 Gerri Kimber
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kimber, G. (2015). Use of Humour. In: Katherine Mansfield and the Art of the Short Story. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137483881_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137483881_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50327-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48388-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)