Abstract
While this chapter acknowledges the debt owed to studies of the representational, its primary purpose is to argue that much is overlooked by such analyses for the construction of meaning in the semiotic landscapes of heritage. Instead, the chapter points to styles of research practice that capture the essences of encounters and engagement in moments of emergent meaning within the affective and representational milieu of heritage. The chapter argues that such practice is exploratory, disrupting the conventional power of the researcher, and seeking both direct evidence of affect and proxy indicators of it in the intensities and mobility of feeling in time and place. To make this case, the chapter draws upon two case studies: the battlefield at Towton and Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park. At both sites, our research style favored data that was generated primarily by respondents in situ and moments of encounter or reflection: via photographs, observed behavior and activity, reactions to situations, immersive ‘self-reporting’, ‘walk-throughs’, and reflective statements made in response to provocations of various kinds. Key to these explorations is the notion of ‘encounter’; through it, we focus upon the energies, realities, and responses of actual bodies as they move around and interpret places that present pasts. In doing so, we explore the opportunities and the challenges of developing research styles that facilitate these new approaches to heritage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bagnall, G. (2003) ‘Performances and Performativity at Heritage Sites’. Museum and Society, 1(2), 87–103.
Brennan, T. (2004) The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Büscher, M., Urry J. and Witchger, K. (eds) (2011) Mobile Methods. Abingdon: Routledge.
Clough, P. T. (2010) ‘The Affective Turn, Political Economy, Biomedia, and Bodies,’ in M. Gregg and G. J. Seigworth (eds) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, pp. 206–225.
Crang, M. (2011) ‘Tourist: Moving Places, Becoming Tourist, Becoming Ethnographer’, in Cresswell, T. and Merriman, P. (eds) Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Andover, Hants: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 205–224.
Crang, M. and Tolia-Kelly D. (2010) ‘Nation, Race and Affect: Senses and Sensibilities at National Heritage Sites’. Environment and Planning A, 42(10), 2315–2331.
Crouch, D. (2010) Flirting with Space: Journeys and Creativity. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Crouch, D. (forthcoming) ‘Affect, Heritage, Feeling’, in E. Waterton and S. Watson (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dahl, T. I., Entner, P. S., Horn Johansen, M-A. and Vittersø, J. (2013) ‘Is Our Fascination with Museum Displays More about What We Think or How We Feel?’ Visitor Studies, 16(2), 160–180.
Falk, J. H and Diering, L. D. (2000) Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. Plymouth: Altamira Press.
Goulding, C. (1999) ‘Contemporary Museum Culture and Consumer Behaviour’, Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 647–671.
Haldrup, M. and Larsen, J. (2010) Tourism, Performance and the Everyday: Consuming the Orient. Abingdon: Routledge.
Haldrup, M. and Larsen, J. (2003) ‘The Family Gaze’, Tourist Studies, 3(1), 23–46.
Herbert, D. T., Prentice, R. C. and Thomas, C. J. (eds) (1989) Heritage Sites: Strategies for Marketing and Development. Aldershot: Avebury Publishers.
Hicks, M. (2012) The Wars of the Roses. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1994) Museums and their Visitors. London: Routledge.
Jones, P., Bunce, G., Evans, J., Gibbs, H. and Hein, J. R. (2008) ‘Exploring Place and Space with Walking Interviews’. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2). Available online at: http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/150/161. Accessed 4 January 2014.
Kusenbach (2003) ‘Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool’. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485.
Latham, A. (2003) ‘Research, Performance, and Doing Human Geography: Some Reflections on the Diary-Photograph, Diary-Interview Method’. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1993–2017.
Massumi, B. (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Morgan, N. and Pritchard, A. (1998) Tourism Promotion and Power: Creating Images, Creating Identities. London: John Wiley and Sons.
Papoulias, C. and Callard, E (2010) ‘Biology’s Gift: Interrogating the Turn to Affect’. Body and Society, 16(1), 29–56.
Pratt, G. (2000) ‘Research Performances’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 639–651.
Prentice, R. (1989) ‘Visitors to Heritage Sites: A Market Segmentation by Visitor Characteristics’, in Herbert, D. T, Prentice, R. C. and Thomas, C. J. (eds) Heritage Sites: Strategies for Marketing and Development. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Prentice, R. (1993) Tourism and Heritage Attractions. London: Routledge.
de Rojas, C. and Camarero, C. (2008) ‘Visitor Experience, Mood and Satisfaction in a Heritage Context: Evidence from an Interpretation Centre’. Tourism Management, 29, 525–537.
Scarles, C. (2009) ‘Becoming Tourist: Renegotiating the Visual in the Tourist Experience’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(3), 465–488.
Scarles, C. (2010) ‘Where Words Fail, Visuals Ignite: Opportunities for Visual Autoethnography in Tourism Research’. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(4), 905–926.
Scarles, C. (2013) ‘The Ethics of Tourist Photography: Tourists’ Experiences of Photographing Locals in Peru’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(5), 897–917.
Stewart, K. (2007) Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Thrift, N. J. (2004) ‘Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect’. Geografiska Annaler, 86(1), 57–78.
—— (2008) Non-Representational Theories. London: Routledge.
Thrift, N. J. and Dewsbury J-D. (2000) ‘Dead Geographies? And How to Make Them Live’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(4), 411–432.
Towton Battlefield Society (2014) ‘Homepage’. Available online at www.towton.org.uk. Accessed 4 January 2014.
Venn, C. (2010) ‘Individuation, Relationality Affect: Rethinking the Human in Relation to the Living’. Body and Society, 16(1), 129–161.
Waitt, G. and Lane, R. (2007) ‘Four-Wheel Drivescapes: Embodied Understandings of the Kimberley’. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 156–169.
Waterton, E. and Watson, S. (2014) The Semiotics of Heritage Tourism. Bristol: Channel View Publications.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Emma Waterton and Steve Watson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Waterton, E., Watson, S. (2007). Methods in Motion: Affecting Heritage Research. In: Knudsen, B.T., Stage, C. (eds) Affective Methodologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137483195_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137483195_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55305-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48319-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)