Abstract
Some years ago, we established a pop-up laboratory at a suburban secondary school in Denmark. Let us call the school ‘X-school’. By the term ‘pop-up laboratory’, we mean a laboratory setting, or a ‘a place to work’, that pops up in a limited time at a particular place and that is designed for working (‘laborara’) with and testing assumptions on a particular research subject on the spot. Our ambition with this laboratory was to get closer to some of the precision mechanisms of new forms of biopolitics. Or, more precisely we were curious about how affects and senses are constructed and governed by new forms of educational leadership, when educational leadership expects students to affectively engage themselves in their own learning processes and to be committed and motivated for further schooling: How did the students feel about this management? How did they the experience to be a ‘human resource’ that could constantly be cultivated and potentialised? Borrowing Brian Massumi’s (2009) term, we might say that we were (and are still) interested in the ‘ontopower’ of today’s schooling and educational leadership, targeting cognition, perception, and affertivity as the objective as well as the means. However, in this chapter, we revisit the format of the pop-up laboratory and more particularly the visual methodologies that we used for producing empirical material. By critically scrutinizing the unintended effects of our lab and how the research design produced and experimented with conflicting affects, this text attempts to contribute with self-critical and nuanced reflections, rather than only celebrate or abandon our own experiment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aakjær, M. and Darsø, L. (2014) ‘Innovative læringsrum: At krydse grænserne for det (u)mulige’, in Staunæs, D., Adriansen, H., Søndergaard, K. D., Nickelsen, N. C. and Pedersen, S. H. (eds) Læringslaboratorier og — eksperimenter. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Aarts, M. (1996) Marte Meo Guide. Aarts Harderwijk. The Netherlands: Aarts Production.
Barad, K. (2003) ‘Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matters Comes to Matter’. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bjerg, H. and Staunæs, D. (2011) ‘Self-Management Through Shame: Uniting Governmentality Studies and the Affective Turn’. Ephemera, (11)2, 138–156.
Blackman, L. (2012) Immaterial Bodies Affect, Embodiment, Mediation. London: Sage.
Brinkman, S. and Tanggaard, L. (2010) ‘Toward an Epistemology of the Hand’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(3), 243–257.
Brown, S. (2012) ‘Experiment: The Experiment in Living’, in Cecilia Lury and Nina Wakeford (eds) Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge.
Bruun, J. and Hansen, S. Pildal (2007) ‘Generaliseret overføring: generaliseret klinik?’ (Generalized Transfer: Generalized Clinque) Drift — tidsskrift for psykoa-nalyse. No.1: 131–148.
Brøgger, K. and Staunæs, D. (2015 forthcomming) ‘Standards and (Self)implo-sion. How the Circulation of Affects Accelerates the Spread of Standards and Intensifies the Embodiment of Colliding, Temporal Ontologies’. Theory & Psychology, special issue on ‘Standards and Subjects’.
Butler, J. (2010) ‘Performative Agency’ Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.
Chaput, C. (2011) ‘Affect and Belonging in Late Capitalism’. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1–20.
Despret, V. (2004) ‘The Body We Care For: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis’. Body & Society, 10(2), 111–134.
Haraway D. J. (1991) ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books, 183–201.
—— (1992) ‘Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politic/s for In/Appropriated Others’, in L. Grossberg (ed.) Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
—— (2007) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Harper, D. (2002) ‘Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation’. Visual Studies, 17(1): 13–25.
Hasse, C. (2014) ‘Menneskelige transformationer i laboratorier’, in D. Staunæs, H. Adriansen, K. D. Søndergaard, N. C. Nickelsen, and S. H. Pedersen, (eds) Læringslaboratorier og -eksperimenter. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Hultman, K. and H. L. Taguchi (2010) ‘Challenging Antropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 525–542.
Lather, P. (2004) ‘Getting Lost. Feminist Efforts Toward a Double(d) Science’. Paper presented at AERA, San Diego.
Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lury C. and Wakeford, N. (2012) ‘Introduction: A Perpetual Inventory’, in Lury C. and Wakeford, N. (eds) Inventive Methods. The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge.
MacLure, M. (2006) ‘The Bone in the Throat: Some Uncertain Thoughts on Baroque Methods.’ International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 729–745.
Massumi, B. (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
—— (2009) ‘Of Microperceptions and Micropolitics’. Inflexions: A Journal for Research-Creation (3) (October). Available atwww.Inflexions.org.
Milgram, S. (1974/2013) Obedience to Authority. New York: Pinter & Martin.
Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
—— (2012) ‘Mind Your Plate! The Ontonorms of Dutch Dieting’. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 379–396.
Pink, S. (2009a) Doing Sensory Ethography. London: Sage.
—— (2009b) Visual Interventions. Applied Visual Anthropology. New York: Berghahn Books.
Raffnsøe, S. and Staunæs, D. (2014) ‘Learning to Stay Ahead of Time: Moving Leadership Experiences Experimentally’. Management & Organizational History, 9(2), 184–201. DOI: 10.1080/17449359.2014.891794.
Samson, K. (2011) Det performative œstetiske byrum (The Performative Aesthetic Space of the City). PhD thesis, Roskilde: Roskilde University.
Staunæs, D. et al. (2014) Læringslaboratorier og-eksperimenter (Learning Laboratories and -Experiments). Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Staunæs, D., Nickelsen, N. C. M., Dupret, K., Adriansen, H. K. and S. H. Pedersen, (2014) ‘Læringslaboratorier og -eksperimenter’, in Staunæs, et al. (eds) Læringslaboratorier og -eksperimenter. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Staunæs, D. and Kofoed, J. (2014a) ‘Visuel metode som affektivt wunderkammer’, (Visual Method as Affective Wunderkammer’), in Tanggaard, L., Thuesen, F. and K. Vitus, (eds) Konflikt i kvalitative studier (Conflicts in Qualitative Methods). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel, 143–172.
Staunæs, D. and Kofoed, J. (2014b) ‘Producing Curious Affects. Visual Methodology as an Affecting and Conflictual Wunderkammer’ International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. EPUB. DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2014.975296.
Vindeløv, V. (2004) Konfliktmægling — mediation og retsmægling (Conflict Mediation: Mediation and Legal Resolutions) Copenhagen: Jurist og økonomforbundets forlag.
Walkerdine, V. (2010) ‘Communal Beingness and Affect: An Exploration of Trauma in an Ex-Industrial Community’. Body & Society, 16(1), 91–116.
Warren, S. (2002) ‘“Show Me How it Feels to Work Here”: Using Photography to Research Organizational Aestetics.’ Ephemera — Critical Dialogues on Organization, 2(3), 224–245.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Dorthe Staunæs and Jette Kofoed
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Staunæs, D., Kofoed, J. (2007). Experimenting with Affects and Senses — A Performative Pop-Up Laboratory (Self-)Critically Revisited. In: Knudsen, B.T., Stage, C. (eds) Affective Methodologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137483195_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137483195_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55305-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48319-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)