The major premise of this book has been that the development and the evolution of antitrust policies in the US, Europe, Japan and the BRICS has been determined and influenced by the institutionalisation of American antitrust theories within various social and cultural frameworks and in response to specific interests. In this context, the pan-institutional approach here adopted appears to be a fundamental tool for analysing such phenomenon. Indeed, starting from Douglass North’s theoretical constructions, pan-institutionalism allows us to assess the evolution of competition policies and regulations by taking into consideration the role of both cognitive (e.g., theories) and normative (e.g., local culture) ideas together with contingent interests in influencing the social realm. This is particularly relevant because there are no such studies of antitrust from an international political economic approach. Typically antitrust is analysed according to economic and juridical points or view as the set of regulations and policies enforced by governments to foster market competitiveness. Indeed, the desirability of competitiveness lies in its capacity to efficiently increase profit and the general wellbeing, as long as market conditions are respected.


Policy Language Economic Freedom Competition Policy Major Premise Causal Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Eleonora Poli 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleonora Poli
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI)Italy
  2. 2.City Political Economy Research Centre (CITYPERC)City University LondonUK

Personalised recommendations