Skip to main content

Agrarian Social Pacts and Poverty Reduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developmental Pathways to Poverty Reduction

Part of the book series: Developmental Pathways to Poverty Reduction ((POD))

  • 255 Accesses

Abstract

Any effort to address poverty must consider the central place of agriculture. Three out of four people in poor countries live in rural areas, most depend on agriculture for their livelihood, and many live in extreme poverty (World Bank, 2007: 1). Recently, the World Bank has taken a renewed interest in agriculture, noting in its World Development Report 2008 that “today’s agriculture offers new opportunities to hundreds of millions of rural poor to move out of poverty” (ibid.). According to the report, gross domestic product (GDP) growth originating in agriculture is at least twice as effective at reducing poverty as growth in other sectors (ibid.: 30).1 Poverty in rural areas declined in the past decade, most notably in China, where rural poverty rates fell from 76 percent in 1980 to 12 percent in 2001 (ibid.: 3, 46).2 Overall, however, rural poverty rates outside China declined only modestly, from 35 to 32 percent in the past ten years. At the same time, gaps between rural and urban income levels have widened (ibid.: 45–7).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alam, Asad et al. 2005. Growth, Poverty, and Inequality: Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, Alberto and others. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(June), 155–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amanor, Kojo Sebastian. 2009. Global Food Chains, African Smallholders and World Bank Governance. Journal of Agrarian Change, 9(April), 247–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, Pratyusha. 2009. Villages, Women, and the Success of Dairy Cooperatives in India: Making Place for Rural Development. New York: Cambia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and State in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batory, Agnes and Nick Sitter. 2004. Cleavages, Competition, and Coalition-Building: Agrarian Parties and the European Question in Western and East Central Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 43(June), 523–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baviskar, B.S. 1968. Cooperatives and Politics. Economic and Political Weekly, 3(March), 490–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Thorsten, and others. 2001. New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15(September), 165–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, Tanguy, and others. 2008. Do Village Organizations Make a Difference in African Rural Development? A Study for Senegal and Burkina Faso. World Development, 36(November), 2188–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaboussou, Anne, and Magali Ruello. 2006. Etude d’un processus de concertation pour l’élaboration d’une politique publique: le cas de la Loi d’Orientation Agro-Sylvo-Pastorale (LOASP) sénégalaise. Paris: Centre International de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chithelen, Ignatius. 1981. Sugar Cooperatives in Maharashtra. Social Scientist, 9(January), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, Willard. 1979. The Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture. 2002. Agricultural Situation in the Candidate Countries: Country Report on Poland. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT. 2005. Population: Long-Term Series (Decennial). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/site/431/default.aspx, accessed 15 January 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, Susanne Elisabeth. 2004. French Beans and Food Scares: Culture and Commerce in an Anxious Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellar, Sheldon. 2005. Democracy in Senegal: Tocquevillian Analytics in Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorlach, Krzysztof and Patrick H. Mooney. 1998. Defending Class Interests: Polish Peasants in the First Years of Transformation. In John Pickles and Adrian Smith (eds), Theorising Transition: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, Darren (ed.). 2005. Surviving Global Change? Agricultural Interest Groups in Comparative Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, Rana and M.G. Quibria. 2004. Industry Matters: A Critique of Agricultural Fundamentalism. Kyklos, 57(May), 253–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasiewicz, Krzysztof and Agnieszka Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz. 2007. Poland. European Journal of Political Research, 46(December), 1063–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasiewicz, Krzysztof and Agnieszka Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz. 2010. Poland. European Journal of Political Research, 49, 1122–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, John T.S. 1987. The Politics of Neocorporatism in France: Farmers, the State, and Agricultural Policy Making in the Fifth Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, John T.S. 1996. Agricultural Power in the European Community: Explaining the Fate of CAP and GATT Negotiations. Comparative Politics, 28(January), 127–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurien, Verghese. 2004. India’s Milk Revolution: Investing in Rural Producer Organizations. Paper presented for Scaling Up Poverty Reduction: A Global Learning Process and Conference, Shanghai, 25–7 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalvani, Mala. 2008. “Sugar Cooperatives in Maharashtra: A Political Economy Perspective. Journal of Development Studies, 44(November), 1474–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, Nicholas. 1991. The Promised Land: The Great Migration and How it Changed America. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, Nora, Michael Watts, and Wendy Wolford. n.d. Peasant Associations in Theory and Practice. Civil Society and Social Movements Programme Paper Number 8. Geneva: UNRISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, Nora. 1999. Grassroots Development and Participation in Policy Negotiations: Bridging the Micro-Macro Gap in Senegal. Paper presented at the Workshop on Agricultural Producer Organizations: Their contribution to rural capacity building and poverty reduction. World Bank, Washington, DC, 28–30 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, Philip. 2009. Banking on Agriculture: A Review of the World Development Report 2008. Journal of Agrarian Change, 9(April), 235–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • MDG Monitor: Tracking the Millennium Development Goals. Available at http://www.mdgmonitor.org/country_progress.cfm?c=SEN&cd=686#, accessed 6 June 2011.

  • Mercoiret, Marie Rose. 2006. Rural Producer Organizations (RPOs), Empowerment of Farmers and Results of Collective Action. Paper prepared for Paris Workshop on Rural Producer Organizations, World Bank, 30–1 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, A. G. 2000. The Politics of Agriculture in Japan. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg, Robert. 2010. Food Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande, Mrinal. 2000. India’s Nurseries of Politics. The Courier/Unesco, 53 (June), 32–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, Raj. 2007. The World Bank and Agriculture: A Critical Review of the World Bank’s Development Report 2008. ActionAid International, October. Available at http://rajpatel.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/actionaid_OnlinePDF.pdf (accessed 6 June 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • PovcalNet: Online Tool Developed by the World Bank Development Research Group. Available at http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/povcalSvy.html (accessed 6 June 2011).

  • Resnick, Danielle, and Regina Birner. 2010. Agricultural Strategy Development in West Africa: The False Promise of Participation? Development Policy Review, 28, 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roudié, Philippe. 1985. La France: Agriculture forêt, pêche depuis1945. Paris: Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Theodore W. 1953. The Economic Organization of Agriculture. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharman, J.C. 2003. Agrarian Politics in Eastern Europe in the Shadow of EU Accession. European Union Politics, 4(December), 447–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheingate, Adam D. 2001. The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State: Institutions and Interest Group Power in the United States, France, and Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph and Andrew Charlton. 2005. Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2001a. The Polish Peasant Party: A Mass Party in Postcommunist Eastern Europe? East European Politics and Societies, 15(September), 554–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2001b. Poles Together? The Emergence and Development of Political Parties in Postcommunist Poland. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarkowska, Elzbieta. 2008. Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rural Areas: Final Report Annex 1 — Country Studies: Poland. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varshney, Ashutosh. 1995. Democracy, Development and the Countryside: Urban-Rural Struggles in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Graham. 1990. Interest Groups. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1998. India: The Dairy Revolution. Washington, DC: World Bank Operations Evaluation Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2006. Dimensions of Urban Poverty in the Europe and Central Asia Region. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3998, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2007. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Development Indicators. 2008. World Bank. http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/, accessed 22 January2008.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 United Nations Research Institute for Social Development

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheingate, A. (2015). Agrarian Social Pacts and Poverty Reduction. In: Bangura, Y. (eds) Developmental Pathways to Poverty Reduction. Developmental Pathways to Poverty Reduction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137482549_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics