Abstract
In this chapter I discuss Wordsworth’s early poetry written between 1798 and 1805. This period corresponds to Coleridge’s early work discussed in the last chapter and to the early stages of the composition of Wordsworth’s planned philosophical epic, The Recluse. I argue that during this period of creativity he attains a metaphysical equipoise 1; that is to say, he attains a deep balance between the outer world and the inner mind. This equipoise consistently eluded Coleridge in his own poetry. The main reason for Wordsworth’s success is his poetic organicism, the view that there is a deep connection between the imaginative powers of the poet and the natura naturans experienced when the poet communes with the natural world. While there is a clear connection with Coleridge’s theoretical dualism of the mechanical and the organic, 2 for Coleridge this theory is mainly placed in the service of his literary criticism rather than in actual poetic creation. By contrast, Wordsworth seeks to attain a union between mind and the natural world through careful deployment of stylistic devices in his poetry. In this way, Wordsworth’s organicism comes very close to the German Naturphilosophie explored by Coleridge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Quoted in Rene Wellek, “The Concept of Romanticism in Literary History” Comparative Literature, 1:1 (1949: Winter): p. 16.
Edith J. Morley (ed.), Correspondence of Crabb Robinson with the Wordsworth Circle Vol.1 1808–1843 (London: Clarendon Press, 1927), p. 407.
Simon Jarvis, Wordsworth’s Philosophic Song (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 3.
William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Lyrical Ballads 1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 156.
Marilyn Butler, Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries: English Literature and its Background 1760–1830 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981), pp. 58, 66.
For a useful discussion of the three major forms of ideology, those of the rationalists, the Hegelian/romantics and the socio-historical (Marx/Heine), see Jerome J. McGann, The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago: Chicago University Press: 1983), pp. 1–39.
Frederick Beiser, “The Paradox of Romantic Metaphysics,” in N. Kompridis (ed.), Philosophical Romanticism (London: Routledge, 2006), p. 231.
The scholarly evidence regarding Wordsworth’s exact reception of Hartley is scarce to say the least. For an interesting discussion, see John Hayden, “Wordsworth, Hartley and the Revisionists” Studies in Philology, 81:1 (1981: Winter), pp. 94–118. Hayden quotes Wordsworth’s only recorded comment on Hartley in a letter of 1808 as one of the “the men of real power, who go before their age” (p. 94).
Jonathan Wordsworth, “The Two-Part Prelude of 1799,” in J. Wordsworth, M. Abrams and S. Gill (eds), The Prelude 1799, 1805, 1850 (New York: Norton, 1979), pp. 575–576.
For an excellent discussion of the twentieth century reception of English Romanticism and Bradley’s role in the rise of Hegelian criticism, see M.H. Abrams, “English Romanticism: The Spirit of the Age,” in The Correspondent Breeze: Essays in English Romanticism (New York: Norton, 1964), pp. 44–75.
A.C. Bradley, “Wordsworth,” in Oxford Lectures on Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1909), p. 134.
Herbert Lindenberger, On Wordsworth’s Prelude (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1963), p. 180.
Geoffrey Hartman, Wordsworth’s Poetry 1787–1814 (New Haven: New Haven University Press, 1964).
Harold Bloom, “The Internalization of Quest Romance,” in H. Bloom (ed.), Romanticism and Consciousness: Essays in Criticism (New York: Norton, 1970), p. 10.
Marlon B. Ross, “Romantic Quest and Conquest: Troping Masculine Power in the Crisis of Poetic Identity,” in A.K. Mellor (ed.), Romanticism and Feminism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988), p. 27.
Ann K. Mellor, Romanticism and Gender (London: Routledge, 1993), p. 149.
The philosophical treatment I give here is only one possible reading of this poem, designed to show the poem as an instance of a deeper philosophical discourse. For more recent historicist work which brings in political aspects and particularly the pertinence of the French Revolution, see David Bromwich, “The French Revolution and Tintern Abbey,” Raritan, 10:3 (1991: Winter): pp. 1–23.
For a much discussed historicist reading of displacements in the poem, see Marjorie Levinson, “Insight and Oversight: Reading ‘Tintern Abbey’,” Wordsworth’s Great Period Poems: Four Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 14–57.
David Perkins, Wordsworth and the Poetry of Sincerity (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1964), pp. 92–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Wayne George Deakin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deakin, W.G. (2015). Wordsworth’s Metaphysical Equipoise. In: Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137482181_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137482181_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50303-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48218-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)