Abstract
The debate about the difference between “politics” and “the political” forms the theoretical background of this study. It offers the opportunity to speak about the political significance of uncivil, illegal and disruptive agency that is not embedded in an institutional political context and often explicitly confronts or challenges such institutional politics. I look at this debate through a postfoundationalist lens and discuss the position of various authors who have played a crucial role in defining this “political difference” (Marchart 2007). They have done so by focusing on the role of the political as a dynamic in human interactions that escapes a “static” organization of politics, both in the sense of a state-induced management of political issues and in the sense of immobilizing or capturing human interactions in a certain prescribed order. The idea of a political element in human interactions that is not already fully captured within politics as an institutional model of organization is important to me in formulating my own understanding of the practice of “unruly politics.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Femke Kaulingfreks
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaulingfreks, F. (2015). At the Threshold between Politics and the Political. In: Uncivil Engagement and Unruly Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137480965_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137480965_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48095-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48096-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)