Abstract
Entrepreneurship is seen as a very important part of a sustainable and long-term economic growth at all levels: individual, firm, regional, national and at the international level. During recent decades, a large number of studies have been conducted on various levels using different approaches, with the aim of developing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms affecting entrepreneurship. Many terms have been generated, with the result that there are a variety of concepts within this field of research. However, there seems to be no common definition of entrepreneurship. This gap creates the need to analyze entrepreneur-ship in each specific context to understand: what entrepreneurship is, who the entrepreneur is, where entrepreneurship happens, why entrepreneurship is important, and how one can nurture entrepreneurship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Almeida, P.I.L., Ahmetoglu, G. and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2013) “Who wants to Be an Entrepreneur? The Relationship Between Vocational Interests and Individual Differences in Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Career Assessment, doi: 10.1177/10690727 13492923.
Asheim, B., Bugge, M.M., Coenen, L., and Herstad, S.(2013) “What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring to the Policy Table? Reconceptualising Regional Innovation Systems”, working paper no. 2013/05, Circle, Lund University.
Baumol, W.J. (1990) “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
Becheikh, N., Landry, R. and Amara, N. (2006) “Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993–2003”, Technovation, 26, 644–664.
Boschma, R. and Frenken, K. (2011) “Technological Relatedness and Regional Branching” in Bathelt, H., Feldman, M.P., and Kogler, D.F. (eds), Beyond Territory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Innovation, London: Routledge, pp. 64–81.
Boschma, R. and Martin, R. (2010) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Cuervo, A., Ribero, D. and Roig, S. (2007) Entrepreneurship: Concepts, Theory and Practice, New York, Springer, pp. 1–19.
Davidson, P. and Wiklund, J. (2001) “Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81–100.
Hassink, R. (2010) “Regional Resilience: A Promising Concept to Explain Differences in Regional Economic Adaptability?”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 45–58.
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M. and Sexton, D.L. (2001) “Guest Editor’s Introduction to the Special Issue Strategic Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth Creation”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 479–491.
Ireland, R.D., Reutzel, C.R. and Webb, J.W. (2005) “Entrepreneurship Research in AMJ: What Has Been Published, and What Might the Future Hold?”, Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 556–564.
Isaksen, A. and Onsager, K. (2010) “Regions, Networks and Innovative Performance: The Case of Knowledge Intensive Industries in Norway”, European Urban and Regional Studies, 17, 227–243.
Isenberg, D. (2010) “How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution”, Harvard Business Review, June.
Isenberg, D. (2011) The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship, The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, Babson Global. Based on an Invited Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, May, 12, 2011, Dublin, Ireland. Accessed at: http://www.wheda.com/uploaded-FilesWebsite/About_Whed/Babson%20Entrepreneurship%20Ecosystem%20 Project.pdf on 10 July 2015.
Martin, R. (2010) “Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography-Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution”, Economic Geography, 86(1), 1―27.
McGrath, R.G. and MacMillan, I.C. (2000) “Assessing Technology Projects using Real Options Reasoning”, Research-Technology Management, 43(4), 35–49.
Miller, D. (1983) “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms”, Management Science, 29, 770–791.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper.
Tanev, S., Knudsen, M. and Gerstlberger, W. (2009) “Value Co-creation as Part of an Integrative Vision of Innovation Management”, Technology Innovation Management Review, http://timreview.ca/aiticle/309.
Tidd, J. and Bessant, J. (2013) Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Wallevik, K., Aas, TH. and Mathiesen, K.H. (2013) “Hvordan lykkes bedrifter med innovasjon?” in Abelsen, B., Isaksen, A. and Jakobsen, S. (eds), Innovasjon-organisasjon, region, politikk, Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Damm, pp. 45–65.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Kristin Wallevik
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wallevik, K. (2015). The Future of Entrepreneurship: Concept and Context. In: Kaufmann, H.R., Shams, S.M.R. (eds) Entrepreneurial Challenges in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137479761_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137479761_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55972-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47976-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)