Skip to main content

Open Design in Advanced Manufacturing Production

  • Chapter
Book cover Entrepreneurial Challenges in the 21st Century

Abstract

The speeding up of the competition context, the ongoing globalization of the markets and the growing supply of technological innovation, sometimes involving a radical change in social attitudes, make it very difficult for a company to understand what a consumer really needs (Bertuzzi, 2003; Weerawardenaa and Mavondo, 2011). The logical consequence is that it becomes more and more complex for the enterprise to stay updated, especially for what concerns technological innovation in those sectors, where it represents a key factor for success in competition. Innovation, therefore, becomes for many companies a strategic imperative (Schilling, 2005; D’Aveni et al., 2010; Soloducho-Pelc; 2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, R.C (1983). “Collective invention”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C (2004). The Long Tail. Wired Magazine 12(10) p. 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avital, M. (2011). “The Generative Bedrock of Open Design”, in B. VAN ABEL, R. KLAASSEN, L. EVERS, P. TROXLER, Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertuzzi, P. (2003) La gestione delle relazione nei mercati industriali. Il caso del settore meccanottessile. Milan: Giuffrè Editore Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bülbül, H, Omurbek, N, Paksoy, T. & Bektaş, T (2013) An empirical investigation of advanced manufacturing technology investment patterns: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 30(2) p. 136–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caoa, H. & Xue, C. (2011) Analysis and evaluation on influencing factors of advanced manufacturing modes diffusion Based on GQM. Procedia Engineering 15, p. 1894–1898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K.W., & Li, S.Y. (2010). Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: The salience of reciprocity. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1033–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau P.Y.K. & Tarn K.Y. (2000). Organizational adoption of open systems: a ‘technology-push, need-pull’ perspective. Information & Management 37: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. (2004) Open design of networked power quality monitoring systems. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on 53(2) p. 597–601 doi: 10.1109/TIM.2003.820496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., (2006). Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiacchierini, E. (2003) Tecnologia e produzione. Roma: Ed. Kappa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J.F., Olesen, M.H., & Kjær, J.S. (2005). The industrial dynamics of open innovation—evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, 34, 1533–1549. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’aveni R.A., Dagnino G.B. & Smith, K.G. (2010), The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal. 31(13). p. 1371–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L. & Gann, D.M., (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy 39, 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy, 41(8), 1283–1295. doi:10.1016/j. respol.2012.03.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodourova, M. & Bevis, K. (2014). Networking innovation in the European car industry: does the open innovation model fit?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, pp. 252–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.E (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felina, T & Zenger, T.R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy 43, pp. 914–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, I.R., Urbana, IL, Jones, M.C., Rathi, D. & Twidale, M.B. (2007). “Web Mash-ups and Patchwork Prototyping: User-driven Technological Innovation with Web 2.0 and Open Source Software. System Sciences”, 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi 10.1109/HICSS.2007.612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S., & Lee, L. (2009). Getting brand communities right. Harvard Business Review, (April) 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., Shah, S., (2003). How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy 32(1), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., Jawecki, G., & Mühlbacher, H. (2007). Innovation creation by online basketball communities. Journal of Business Research, 60, 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., Hutter, K., & Faullant, R. (2011). Why co-creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions. R&D Management, 41(3), 259–273, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.l467-9310.2011.00640.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, J., Füller, J., & Pezzei, R. (2013). The dark and the bright side of co-creation: triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1516–1527. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., Von Hippel, E., (2003). Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy 32(10), 1753–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, Ø., Ayala, C & Conradi, R. (2010). Adoption of open source software in software-intensive organizations-A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 52 p. 1133–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, J.C., & Mcdonagh, P. (2013). Consumer roles in brand culture and value co-creation in virtual communities. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1528–1540. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T.J., Achiche, S. Özkil, A. & Mcaloone, T.C. (2012). “Open design and Crowdsourcing: maturity, methodology and business models”, International Design Conference, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe J. (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired, 14 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe J. (2008) Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe J. (2010) Crowdsourcing-il valore partecipativo come risorsa per il futuro del business. Sossella Editore, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A.M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68. doi:10.1016/j. bushor.2009.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, M.D. & Turner, I.Y. (2009) Towards open design: the emergent face of engineering-a position paper. Proceedings of ICED’09, 3(11) pp 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R.V., Hemetsberger, A., & Schau, H.J. (2008). The wisdom of consumer crowds: Collective innovation in the age of networked marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), 339–354, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0276146708325382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R.V., Wilner, S., Wojnicki, A., & de Valck, K. (2010). Networks of narr-ativity: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K.R., Von Hippel, E., (2003). How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy 32(6), 923–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberts, R. (1998) Open Design Circuits. Open Design Circuits. http://web.archive.org/web/19981207075641/ http://circu.its.tudelft.nl/.

  • Lei, D., Hitt, M.A. & Goldhar, J.D. (1996) Advanced Manufacturing Technology: Organizational Design and Strategic Flexibility. Organization Studies May. 17(3) p. 501–523. doi: 10.1177/017084069601700307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D., Rayport, J.F., 1997. Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard Business Review 75(6), 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, R (2002) L’intelligenza collettiva. Perun’antropologia del cyberspazio. Milan: Universale Economica Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C, & Bernoff, J. (2008). Groundswell. Harvard Business School Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, A., Massa, S., & Testa, S. (2014). Customer co-creation projects and social media: The case of Barilla of Italy. Business Horizons, 57(3), 425–434. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2014.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, D. & Wirten, I.H. (2013). An open-source toolkit for mining Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence. 194 p. 222–239 doi:10.1016/j.artint.2012.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosconi E.M., Silvestri C, Poponi S. & Braccini A.M. (2013). Public Policy Innovation in Distance and On-Line Learning: reflections on the Italian Case. Organizational Change and Information System. 2, p. 381–389, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37228-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Interactions in virtual customer environments: Implications for product support and customer relationship management. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 42–62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ dir.20077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ODF (Open Design Foundation) (2000). “Open Design Definition”. http://www.opendesign.org/odd.html.

  • Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prpić, J., Shukla, P.P, Kietzmann, J.H. & McCarthy, I.P. (2015) How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing. Business Horizons. 58(1) p. 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raasch, C, Herstatt, C. & Balka, K. (2009) On the open design of tangibles goods. R&D Management 39, 4, 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raasch, C. & Herstatt, C. (2011) How companies capture value from open design. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 3(1), 39. doi:10.1504/ IJIDS.2011.038840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond E.S. (2001) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. California: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond E.S. (2004). Up from Alchemy. IEEE Software 21(1) 88–90, doi:10.1109/ ms.2004.1259228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesner, F, Kohno, T., Moshchuk, A., Parno, B., Wang, HJ. & Cowan, C. (2012). “User-Driven Access Control: Rethinking Permission Granting in Modern Operating Systems. Security and Privacy (SP)”, 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 224–238, IEEE doi 10.1109/SP.2012.24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggieri A., Mosconi E.M., Braccini A.M. & poponi S., (2014a) Strategies and Policies for Avoid Digital Divide: The Italian Case in the European Landscape, Proceedings of X Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS Empowering society through digital innovations. Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan (Italy), December 14, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggieri A., Mosconi E.M., Poponi S. & Silvestri C, (2014b) Digital innovation in the job market: an explorative study on cloud working platforms. XI Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, Digital Innovation and Inclusive Knowledge in Times of Change. University of Genova (Italy), November 21–22 2014. Proceedings ISBN: 978–88-6685-008-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling M.A. (2005) Gestione dell’innovazione. Milan: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoute, M. (2011) The relationship between product diversity, usage of advanced manufacturing technologies and activity-based costing adoption. The British Accounting Review, 43(2), p. 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2011) Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: from solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweosfurth, T., Raasch, C. & Herstatt, C (2011). Free revealing in open innovation: a comparison of different models and their benefits for companies. International Journal of Product Development, 13(2), p. 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. G.(2012). New product development methods: a study of open design. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloducho-Pelc, L. (2014). Competitive advantage: the courage in formulating objectives and expansiveness of a strategy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 150, p. 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A, Motik, B. & Stojanovic, N. (2002) User-Driven Ontology Evolution Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2473: 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svobodová, L.(2011) Advanced manufacturing technology utilization and realized benefits. International CSCC Multiconference, Corfu, July, p. 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. & Williams, A.D. (2008). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustyugová T. & Noskievicova, D. (2013) Integration Of Lean And Agile Manufacturing Based On Principles From Wikinomics. Quality Innovation Prosperity 17(1), p. 48–56 Doi: 10.12776/Qip.V17il.63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallance R., Kiani S. & Nayfeh S. (2001) “Open Design of Manufacturing Equipment”, CIRP 1st International Conference on Agile, Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, p. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke, W. & Cloodt, M., (2014). Theories of the firm and open innovation. In: Chesborough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (Eds), Open Innovation: New Directions and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E., (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem-solving: implications for innovation. Management Science 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. & Von Krogh, E., (2003). Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: issues for organization science. Organization Science 14, 208–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S. & Lakhani, K.R., 2003. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Research Policy 32, 1217–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldeck, N. & Leffakis, Z. (2007) HR Perceptions and the Provision of Workforce Training in An AMT Environment: An Empirical Study. Omega 35(2), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardenaa, J. & Mavondo, ET. (2011). Capabilities, innovation and competitive advantage. Industrial Marketing Management. 40(8). p. 1220–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. California: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousseff, M.A.(1992) Getting to know advanced manufacturing technologies. Industrial Engineering, 24(2), 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zairi, M. (1993) Competitive manufacturing: combining total quality with advanced technology. Long Range Planning, 26(3) p. 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zammuto, R.E & O’connor, EJ. (1992) Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies’ benefits: the roles of organizational design and culture. Academy of Management Review, 17(4) p. 701–728.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Alessandro Ruggieri, Enrico Maria Mosconi, Stefano Poponi and Cecilia Silvestri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruggieri, A., Mosconi, E.M., Poponi, S., Silvestri, C. (2015). Open Design in Advanced Manufacturing Production. In: Kaufmann, H.R., Shams, S.M.R. (eds) Entrepreneurial Challenges in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137479761_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics