Spatial Engagement with Poetry pp 151-173 | Cite as
Of Passage and Process: Alice Oswald’s Dart
- 117 Downloads
Abstract
In the poetry of Thomas Kinsella, Kathleen Jamie, and Mimi Khalvati, we have seen poetic space created out of the play of notions of alterity in language and being. Often, also, mediation has been the key to understanding and poetic resolution. In all cases, effective communication of experience lies in the state of dwelling of the I/eye of each poem: it is “both mine and not mine,”1 a part of and also apart from the world, in a space within the open bounds of the mediatory experience. As Kinsella, Jamie, and Khalvati all see the act of poetic creation as a never-ending state of process, for Alice Oswald, the act of poetic creation, and the status of the finished product, is a “working account.”2 It is this sense of self-conscious, affective, and continual experience, which creates and defines its own passage in relation to itself, and finds coherence in the scattered nature of its milieu, that we can see articulated powerfully in Alice Oswald’s river-poem Dart.
Keywords
Person Pronoun River Model Dream State Multiple Voice Single VoicePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.Helen Vendler, Soul Says: On Recent Poetry (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995): 8.Google Scholar
- 3.Theodor Schwenk, Sensitive Chaos: The Creation of Flowing Forms in Water and Air, trans. Olive Whicher and Johanna Wrigley (Sussex: Steiner Press, 1996): 19.Google Scholar
- 4.Charles Bennett, “Current Literature 2002: New Writing: Poetry,” English Studies 85.3 (2002): 231.Google Scholar
- 6.Serres, The Five Senses: A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies. Trans. Margaret Sankey and Peter Cowley (London: Continuum, 2008): 258.Google Scholar
- 7.Dianne Meredith, “Hazards in the Bog: Real and Imaginary,” Geographical Review 92.3 (2002): 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Giorgio Agamben, The Coming Community, trans. Michael Hardt (Minneapolis: University Minnesota Press, 1993): 80.Google Scholar
- 10.See, in particular, Derrida, Of Grammatology, where the manner in which the signifier and its double expresses itself through the writing (and concomitant reading) act as “always already”: writing “already presupposes an identity, therefore an ideality, of its form”, also representing “the passage of the one [the signifier] to the other [the trace]”. Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1976): 9–10.Google Scholar
- 13.Michel Serres, Catherine Brown, William Paulson, “Science and the Humanities: The Case of Turner,” SubStance 26.2, 83 (1997):15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Brian Massumi, “Realer than Real: The Simulacrum According to Deleuze and Guattari” (1987) last/works/realer.htmGoogle Scholar
- 15.Alice Oswald, Woods etc (London: Faber, 2005): 41.Google Scholar
- 17.Michel Serres, Hermes: Literature, Science, Philosophy. Trans. Josué V. Harari and David Bell (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982): 70.Google Scholar
- 20.Michel Serres, The Birth of Physics, trans. Jack Hawkes (Manchester: Clinamen Press, 2000): 108.Google Scholar
- 21.Giorgio Agamben, Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience, trans. Liz Heron (London: Verso, 2007): 46.Google Scholar
- 23.Kenneth White, The Wanderer and His Charts: Essays on Cultural Renewal (London: Polygon, 2004): 6.Google Scholar
- 24.See Kenneth White, Dialogue avec Deleuze: Politique, Philosophie, Géopoétique (Paris: Isolato, 2007): 20–27. My trans.Google Scholar
- 28.Gilles Deleuze, Proust and Signs, trans. Richard Howard (London: Continuum, 2008): 62.Google Scholar
- 33.Michel Serres, Atlas (Paris: Flammarion, 1992): 12.Google Scholar