Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 185 Accesses

Part of the book series: Geocriticism and Spatial Literary Studies ((GSLS))

Abstract

The map is a descriptive and navigational tool, just as the process of mapping is one of simultaneous recognition and creation. Theresa Stopani, in an essay on mapping, situates this multidirectional impulse as a foundational premise:

Mapping is the locus of the project: the descriptive and generative tool that is capable of producing and accommodating together the many and different possible unfoldings of the project(s). Mapping is always an incomplete and insufficient description and its incompleteness remains open to the condensation of multiple possibilities.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Theresa Stopani, “Mapping: the Locus of the Project,” Angelaki 9.2 (2004): 282.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mutlu Konuk Blasing’s Lyric Poetry: The Pain and Pleasure of Words (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013) provides an extremely convincing call for poetry criticism to regain its critical and disciplinary, not to mention political, power by eschewing these two “easy” methods of criticism.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michel Serres, Atlas (Paris: Flammarion, 1992): 276.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denise Riley, Impersonal Passion: Language as Affect (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005): 27.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Iain McGilchrist, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009): 391.

    Google Scholar 

  6. George Mackay Brown, For the Islands I Sing (London: John Murray, 1997): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See for instance Jacob Edmond’s reading of Bei Dao’s “Hello, BaiHua Mountain,” which places much emphasis on the linguistic materiality and historical and political location through the changing resonances of the Chinese xue hua Dịch văn bản hoặc trang web 雪花 , snowflake, throughout the poem. In Jacob Edmonds, A Common Strangeness: Contemporary Poetry, Cross-CulturalEncounter, Comparative Literature (New York: Fordham University Press, 2012): 113–117.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Michael Hardt and Kathi Weekes, “Introduction,” in The Jameson Reader, ed. Hardt and Weekes (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bertrand Westphal, “Foreword,” in Geocritical Explorations: Space, Place, and Mapping in Literary and Cultural Studies, ed. Robert T. Tally Jr. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011): xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luiza Lobo, “Brazil,” Encyclopedia of Latin American Literature, ed. Verity Smith (London: Taylor and Francis, 1997): 146.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Marshall McLuhan and Victor Papanek, Verbi-Voco-Visual Explorations (New York: Something Else Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ian Davidson, Ideas of Space in Contemporary Poetry (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), and Radical Spaces of Poetry (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Derek Attridge, Moving Words: Forms of English Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013): 77.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Robert Duncan, “The Self in Postmodern Poetry” (1979), in Collected Essays and Other Prose, ed. James Maynard (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014): 395.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. J. T. Mitchell, “Space, Ideology, and Literary Representation,” Poetics Today 10.1 (1989): 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Michel Serres, Hermes: Literature, Science, Philosophy, trans. Josué V. Harari and David Bell (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982): xxi.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas Kinsella, Davis, Mangan, Ferguson? Tradition and the Irish Writer (Dublin: Dolmen Press, 1970): 30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michel Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, trans. Colin Gordon et al. (New York: Pantheon, 1980): 162–163.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Doreen Massey, For Space (London: Sage, 2005): 4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Heather H. Yeung

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yeung, H.H. (2015). Introduction. In: Spatial Engagement with Poetry. Geocriticism and Spatial Literary Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478276_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics