Skip to main content

Re-thinking Governance in Public Policy: Dynamics, Strategy and Capacities

  • Chapter
Varieties of Governance

Abstract

Governance is not a fashion, but a firmly established lens through which to analyse the complexity of contemporary policy-making, that is the way in which a society and its political processes are organized and steered. Thus, governance needs to be seen as a general concept within political analysis that represents a necessary, heuristic tool with which to describe some of the complexity of political processes. Governance is not only a fashionable term, but one destined to remain with us for some time yet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aucoin P. (1990) Administrative reform in public management: Paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums. Governance, 3: 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache I. (1998) Multi-level governance and EU Regional Policy. in Multi-level governance. I. Bache (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay M. (2001) The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner F.R. and Jones B. (1993) Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner F.R. and Jones B. (eds) (2002) Policy dynamics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell S. and Hindmoor S. (2009) Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in modern societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bemelmans-Videc M.L., Rist R.C. and Vedung E. (eds) (1998) Carrots, sticks & sermons: Policy instruments & their evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley T. and Persson T. (2011) Pillars of prosperity: State capacity and economic development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binderkrantz A.S. and Krøyer S. (2012) Customizing strategy: Policy goals and interest groups strategies. Interest groups and advocacy, 1(1): 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel T. (2010) European governance; Negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48: 191–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano G. (2011) Government continues to do its job: A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector. Public Administration, 89(4): 1622–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano G., Rayner J. and Zito A. (2012) Governance from the bottom up: Complexity and divergence in comparative perspective. Public Administration, 90(1): 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine M. and Lewis J.M. (2003) Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2): 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis G. (2002) Policy capacity and the future of governance. In The future of governance. G. David and M. Keating (eds). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin. 230–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dür A. and de Bièvre D. (2007) The question of interest group influence. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P., Rueschemeyer D. and Skocpol T. (1985) Bringing the state back in. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P. (1997) The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. World Politics, 50(1): 62–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F. (2013) What is governance? Governance, 26(3): 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz K.H. (2008) Governance as a path to government. West European Politics, 31(1–2): 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham N. (2009) Environmental law, regulation and governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law, 21(2): 179–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand L. (2012) Public policy design and assumptions about human behavior. Paper presented at the 2012 Western Political Science Association’s Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritier A. and Eckert S. (2008) New modes of governance in the shadow of hierarchy: Self-regulation by industry in Europe. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1): 113–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier A. and Lehmkuhl D. (2008) The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance: Sectoral governance and democratic government. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill C.J. and Lynn L.E. (2005) Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2): 173–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood B.W. and Peters B.G. (1983) Policy Dynamics. New York: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood C. (1983) The tools of government. London, Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe L. and Marks G. (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American political science review, 97(2): 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M. (2011) Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M., J. Rayner and Tollefson C. (2009) From government to governance in forest planning? Lesson from the case of the British Columbia Great Bear Rainforest Initiative. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5–6): 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordana J. and Levi-Faur D. (2004) The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane J.E. (2000) New public management. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn L.E. (2006) Public management: Old and new. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn L.E. (2010) The persistence of hierarchy. In The Sage handbook of governance. M. Bevir (ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 218–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn L.E. (2012) The many faces of governance: adaptation? Transformation? Both? Neither? In The Oxford handbook of governance. D. Levi-Faur (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks G. (1996) Exploring and Explaining Variation in EU Cohesion Policy. In: Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multilevel governance. L. Hooghe (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 388–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks G., Hooghe L. and Blank S.J. (1996) European Integration from the 1980s: State v. Multi-level Governance. Journal of common market studies, 34(3): 341–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiews F. (2012) Governance and state capacity. In The Oxford handbook of governance. D. Levi-Faur (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R. (2004) Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 34(2): 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010) Pisa 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies, and Practices. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongaro E. (2009) Public management reform and modernization: Trajectories of administrative change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E. (1990) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters B.G. (2012) Governance and political theory. In The Oxford handbook of governance. D. Levi-Faur (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre J. and Peters B.G. (2005) Governing complex societies: Trajectories and scenarios. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt C. and Bouckaert G. (2000) Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt C. and Bouckaert G. (2009) Continuity and change in public policy and management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh M. and Howlett M. (2006) Deregulation and its discontents: Rewriting the rules in Asia. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes A.W. (1997) Understanding governance. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards D. and Smith M. (2002) Governance and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2012) New Governance or Old Governance? A Policy Style Perspective. In D. Levi-Faur (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: OUP, 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B. (2011) The Quality of government: Corruption, social trust and inequality in a comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P. and Jenkins-Smith H.C. (1993) Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, J. (2011) Transnational transformations of governance: The european union and beyond. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf F.W. (1997) Introduction: The Problem-solving capacity of multi-level governance. Journal of European public policy, 4(4): 520–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A.L. and Ingram H. (1997) Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon J. (2008) Law and governance in the 21st century regulatory state. Texas Law Review, 86: 819–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson C., Zito A.R. and Gale F. (2012) Symposium overview: Conceptualizing new governance arrangements. Public Administration, 90 (1): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treib O., Bahr H. and Falkner G. (2007) Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woessmann L. (2007) International evidence on school competition, autonomy and accountability: A review. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(2–3): 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1994) Governance: The World Bank’s experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Giliberto Capano, Michael Howlett and M. Ramesh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Capano, G., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. (2015). Re-thinking Governance in Public Policy: Dynamics, Strategy and Capacities. In: Capano, G., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. (eds) Varieties of Governance. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137477972_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics