Skip to main content

Theoretical Basis to Embed the Real into the Financial: Production-Consumption Compromise vs Supply-Demand Paradigm

  • Chapter
Crisis and Embodied Innovations
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

The “criterion of observability” that Kurz and Salvadori (2000) ascribe to Leontief spearheads the argument against the neoclassical theory relying on the non-observable utilities and preferences. We would lessen this strictness in the sense that if there is no way to go on without the non-observables, they should be introduced at least in a logically consistent manner. This will even improve a little their practical applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Volodymyr Ryaboshlyk

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ryaboshlyk, V. (2014). Theoretical Basis to Embed the Real into the Financial: Production-Consumption Compromise vs Supply-Demand Paradigm. In: Crisis and Embodied Innovations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137477071_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics