Abstract
The idea of finance points us to two related but distinguishable profound perspectives for understanding and interrogating finance capital and its place in any modern economy. First, the idea of finance relates to the internal split of the modern economy. It refers to the primordial crack or lack at the birth of the modern economy that both causes and traces an inherent imbalance at the core of any economy. This split is constitutive of the modern economy. There is always an internal gap within the economy, and finance capital is the form of appearance of both the economy and its inherent gap. Contrary to popular opinion, finance or finance capital has no separate existence of its own; it is part of the spatial-temporal processes of the economy. The idea of finance captures the thinking that for an economy to exist as a monetary economy it must be divided against itself. The basic insight here is that the “external” opposition between Main Street (real production) and Wall Street (mere financial activities, so-called casino capitalism) is grounded in the modern economy’s immanent self-opposition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Slavoj Žižek, Less than Nothing: Hegeland the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism (London: Verso, 2012), 247.
Mark Granovetter, “Economics Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddeness,” American Journal of Sociology 91, no. 3 (1985): 481–510;
Amartya Sen, “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, no. 4 (1977): 317–44; On Ethics and Economics (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 1988).
Jacques Rancière, Hatred of Democracy, trans. Steve Corcoran (London: Verso, 2006), 41.
Peter Alexander Egom, Economic Mind of God (Lagos: Adioné Publishers, 2007) and Economics of Justice and Peace (Lagos: Adioné Publishers, 2007).
G. W. F. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), 89, quoted in Žižek, Less than Nothing, 37; italics are in the original.
Jacques Rancière, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, trans. Julie Rose (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998), 6.
Nimi Wariboko, God and Money: A Theology of Money in a Globalizing World (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2008), 73–96.
Peter Hallward, Badiou: A Subject to Truth (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003), 257–58.
In the following discussion of these three elements I will draw heavily, albeit crudely, from Alain Badiou’s discourse on “philosophical institution.” See Alain Badiou, Conditions, trans. Steven Corcoran (London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2008), 27–28.
Jan Patočka, Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History, trans. Erazim Kohák (Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing, 1996), 27.
Patočka, Heretical Essays, 56–57. See also Erazim Kohák, Jan Patočka: Philosophy and Selected Writings (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1989) 123.
Patočka, Heretical Essays; Jan Patočka, Body, Community, Language, World, trans. Erazim Kohák (Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing, 1998).
Edward F. Findlay, Caring for the Soul in a Postmodern Age: Politics and Phenomenology in the thought of Jan Patočka (Albany: State University of New York, 2002), 53.
Alain Badiou, Being and Event, trans. Oliver Feltham (New York: Continuum, 2005).
See also Kenneth A. Reynhout, “Alain Badiou: Hidden Theologian of the Void?,” Heythrop Journal, LII (2011), 219–23.
“The present implies space. Time creates the present through its union with space. In this union time comes to a standstill because there is something on which to stand. Like time, space unites being with nonbeing …To be means to have space” (Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology: Reason and Revelation, Being and God, vol. 1 [Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1951], 194).
Jean-Luc Nancy, Dis-Enclosure: The Deconstruction of Christianity, trans. Bettina Bergo, Gabriel Malenfant, and Micheal B. Smith (New York: Fordham University Press, 2008), 152–54.
Copyright information
© 2014 Nimi Wariboko
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wariboko, N. (2014). The Idea of Finance. In: Economics in Spirit and Truth. Radical Theologies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137475503_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137475503_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50183-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47550-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)