Advertisement

International Postgraduate Students’ Perceptions and Experiences of Peer Assessment in a UK University: A Case Study

Chapter
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

Internationalization of higher education brings both opportunities and challenges for internationalizing teaching, learning, and the curriculum and assessment experience of all students (Ryan 2013). Assessment determines student learning progression and completion, so international students (IS) who have made a significant investment to study abroad can be significantly stressed by the assessment practices they encounter (Brown and Joughin 2007). The IS from different cultural backgrounds have been influenced by different assessment systems in their earlier learning experiences, which may differ from those they encounter in the United Kingdom higher education (HE) assessment system (Robson 2011). As a result of a growing dissatisfaction with traditional forms of assessment, formative assessment, in contrast to summative assessment, has gained favor to encourage deeper engagement with learning and enhance learner autonomy and motivation; for this reason, it has attracted the attention of educational researchers. At the same time, various innovative assessment approaches, such as portfolios, peer assessment, and self-assessment, have been advocated to positively influence and promote student learning (Kvale 2007). However, there has been relatively little research on how IS perform in innovative assessment environments and how this affects them.

Keywords

International Student Chinese Student Summative Assessment Peer Assessment Academic Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altbach, P., and J. Knight. (2007). “The Internationalisation of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities.” Journal of Studies in International Education. 11.3/4: 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, D. (2008). “Exploratory Talk for Learning.” In N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes. London: Sage. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  5. Boud, D. (2000). “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education. 22.2: 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. (2001). “Peer Learning and Assessment.” In D. Boud, R. Cohen, and J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in Higher Education. London: KoganPage. 67–81.Google Scholar
  7. Brew, C., P. Riley, and C. Walta. (2009). “Education Students and Their Teachers: Comparing Views on Participative Assessment Practices.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 34: 641–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S., and A. Glasner. (1999). Assessment Matters in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, S., and G. Joughin. (2007). “Assessment and International Students: Helping Clarify Puzzling Processes.” In E. Jones and S. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising Higher Education. Oxon: Routledge. 57–71.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, N. S., C. W. Wei, K. T. Wu, and L. Uden. (2009). “Effects of High Level Prompts and Peer Assessment on Online Learners’ Reflection Levels.” Computers and Education. 52.2: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng, W., and M. Warren. (1997). “Having Second Thoughts: Student Perceptions before and after a Peer Assessment Exercise.” Studies in Higher Education. 11.1: 133–140.Google Scholar
  12. —. (1999). “Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 24.3: 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi, Y. (2003). “Being Outside and Inside: Dialogic Identity and Intercultural Communication through Drama in Teaching English as an International Language.” PhD diss., Durham University, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, J. (2012). “Using Diamond Ranking as Visual Cues to Engage Young People in the Research Process.” Qualitative Research Journal. 12.2: 222–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clifford, V., and C. Montgomery. (Eds.). (2011). Moving towards Internationalization of the Curriculum. Oxford: Centre for Staff and Learning Development.Google Scholar
  16. Conway, R., D. Kember, A. Sivan, and M. Wu. (1993). “Peer Assessment of an Individual’s Group Project.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 18: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cushner, K., and A. Karim. (2004). “Study Abroad at the University Level.” In D. Landis, J. Bennett, and M. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of Intercultural Training (3d ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2003). The Future of Higher Education. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  19. Dochy, F., and L. McDowell. (1997). “Assessment as a Tool for Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation. 23.4: 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dochy, F., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. (1999). “The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education. 24.3: 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ecclestone, K., and J. Pryor. (2003). “‘Learning Careers’ or Assessment Careers’? The Impact of Assessment Systems on Learning.” British Educational Research Journal. 29.4: 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, C. (2013). “Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education.” Review of Educational Research. 83.1: 70–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falchikov, N. (1986). “Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self-Assessments.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 11: 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. —. (1995). “Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Training International. 32: 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. —. (2005). Improving Assessment through Student Involvement. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  26. Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. (2000). “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research. 70: 287–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Furnham, A. (2004). “Foreign Students’ Education and Culture Shock.” The Psychologist. 17: 16–19.Google Scholar
  28. Gatfield, T. (1999). “Examining Student Satisfaction with Group Projects and Peer Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 24.4: 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gu, Q., and M. Schweisfurth. (2011). “Rethinking University Internationalisation: Towards Transformative Change.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 17.6: 611–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrison, N., and N. Peacock. (2010). “Interactions in the International Classroom: The UK Perspective.” In E. Jones (Ed.), Internationalization and the Student Voice: Higher Education Perspectives. New York: Routledge. 125–142.Google Scholar
  31. HEA (Higher Education Academy). (2012). “Annual Report.” http://wales.heacad-emy.ac.uk/assets/documents/aboutus/HEA_Annual_Report_2012–13.PDF (accessed June 28, 2013).Google Scholar
  32. Jones, E. (2013). “Internationalization and Employability: The Role of Intercultural Experiences in the Development of Transferable Skills.” Public Money and Management. 33.2: 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Killick, D. (2013). “Global Citizenship and Campus Community: Lessons from Learning Theory and the Lived-Experience of Mobile Students.” In J. Ryan (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Teaching and Teaming for Home and International Students: Internationalization of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London: Routledge. 182–195.Google Scholar
  34. Kim, M. (2009). “The Impact of an Elaborated Assessee’s Role in Peer Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 34: 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kvale, S. (2007). “Contradictions of Assessment for Learning in Institutions of Higher Learning.” In D. Boud and N. Falchnikov (Eds.), Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: learning for the longer Term. New York: Routledge. 57–71.Google Scholar
  36. Leask, B. (2007). “International Teachers and International Learners.” In E. Jones and S. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising Higher Education. Oxon: Routledge. 86–94.Google Scholar
  37. Loddington, S., K. Pond, N. Wilkinson, and P. Willmot. (2009). “A Case Study of the Development of WebPA: An Online Peer-Moderated Tool.” British Journal of Educational Technology. 40: 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McAlpine, M., and J. Greatorex. (2000). “Application of Number: An Investigation into a Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Production and Reproduction of Pedagogical Practices.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, University of Cardiff, UK, September 7–9, 2000.Google Scholar
  39. McDowell, L., and G. Mowl. (1996). “Innovative Assessment—Its Impact on Students.” In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving Student learning through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development. 131–147.Google Scholar
  40. Middlehurst, R., and S. Woodfield. (2007). Responding to the Internationalization Agenda: Implications for Institutional Strategy. York: The Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  41. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2004). Internationalisation of Higher Education: Policy Brief. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  42. Ollin, R. (2008). “Silent pedagogy and rethinking classroom practice: Structuring teaching through silence rather than talk.” Cambridge Journal of Education, 38.2: 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pettigrew, T. F., and L. R. Tropp. (2000). “Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings.” In S. Oskamp (ed.), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination. The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  44. Prins, P. J., D. M. A. Sluijsmans, P. A. Kirschner, and J.-W. Strijbos. (2005). “Formative Peer Assessment in a CSCL Environment: A Case Study.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 30: 417–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robson, S. (2011). “Internationalization: A Transformative Agenda for Higher Education?” Teachers and Teaching. 17.6: 619–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rockett, M., and S. Percival. (2002). Thinking for Learning. Stafford: Network Educational Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ryan, J. (Ed.). (2013). Cross-Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalization of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Shi, L. (2006). “The Successors to Confucianism or a New Generation? A Questionnaire Study on Chinese Students’ Culture of Learning English.” Language, Culture and Curriculum. 19.1: 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., and J. J. G. Van Merrienboer. (2000). A Peer Assessment Model. Heerlen, Netherlands: Center for Educational Technology and Expertise.Google Scholar
  50. Strijbos, J. W., and D. Sluijsmans. (2010). “Unravelling Peer Assessment: Methodological, Functional, and Conceptual Developments.” Learning and Instruction. 20: 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Topping, K. J. (1998). “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research. 68: 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. —. (2000). Peer Assisted Learning: A Practical Guide for Teachers. Cambridge: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
  53. —. (2010). “Methodological Quandaries in Studying Process and Outcomes in Peer Assessment: Commentary.” Learning and Instruction. 20.4: 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Torrance, H., and J. Pryor. (1998). Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University.Google Scholar
  55. Turner, Y. (2013). “Pathologies of Silence? Reflection on International Learner Identities amidst the Classroom Chatter.” In J. Ryan (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalization of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London: Routledge. 227–241.Google Scholar
  56. Turner, Y., and S. Robson. (2008). Internationalizing the University. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  57. Van der Pol, J., B. A. M. van den Berg, W. F. Admiral, and P. R. J. Simons. (2008). “The Nature, Reception, and Use of Online Peer Feedback in Higher Education.” Computers and Education. 51: 1804–1817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vickerman, P. (2009). “Student Perspectives on Formative Peer Assessment: An Attempt to Deepen Learning?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 34: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vu, T., and G. Dall’Alba. (2007). “Students’ Experience of Peer Assessment in a Professional Course.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 32.5: 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Ward, C., S. Bochner, and A. Furnham. (2001). The Psychology of Culture Shock. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Wen, L. L., and C. Tsai. (2006). “University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward (Online) Peer Assessment.” Higher Education. 51: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, E. (1992). “Student Attitudes towards Approaches to Learning and Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 17: 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yamazaki, Y. (2005). “Learning Styles and Typologies of Cultural Differences: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 29.5: 521–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gordon E. Slethaug and Jane Vinther 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations