Skip to main content

International Postgraduate Students’ Perceptions and Experiences of Peer Assessment in a UK University: A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

Internationalization of higher education brings both opportunities and challenges for internationalizing teaching, learning, and the curriculum and assessment experience of all students (Ryan 2013). Assessment determines student learning progression and completion, so international students (IS) who have made a significant investment to study abroad can be significantly stressed by the assessment practices they encounter (Brown and Joughin 2007). The IS from different cultural backgrounds have been influenced by different assessment systems in their earlier learning experiences, which may differ from those they encounter in the United Kingdom higher education (HE) assessment system (Robson 2011). As a result of a growing dissatisfaction with traditional forms of assessment, formative assessment, in contrast to summative assessment, has gained favor to encourage deeper engagement with learning and enhance learner autonomy and motivation; for this reason, it has attracted the attention of educational researchers. At the same time, various innovative assessment approaches, such as portfolios, peer assessment, and self-assessment, have been advocated to positively influence and promote student learning (Kvale 2007). However, there has been relatively little research on how IS perform in innovative assessment environments and how this affects them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altbach, P., and J. Knight. (2007). “The Internationalisation of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities.” Journal of Studies in International Education. 11.3/4: 290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (2008). “Exploratory Talk for Learning.” In N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes. London: Sage. 1–12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2000). “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education. 22.2: 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. (2001). “Peer Learning and Assessment.” In D. Boud, R. Cohen, and J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in Higher Education. London: KoganPage. 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, C., P. Riley, and C. Walta. (2009). “Education Students and Their Teachers: Comparing Views on Participative Assessment Practices.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 34: 641–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., and A. Glasner. (1999). Assessment Matters in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., and G. Joughin. (2007). “Assessment and International Students: Helping Clarify Puzzling Processes.” In E. Jones and S. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising Higher Education. Oxon: Routledge. 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. S., C. W. Wei, K. T. Wu, and L. Uden. (2009). “Effects of High Level Prompts and Peer Assessment on Online Learners’ Reflection Levels.” Computers and Education. 52.2: 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W., and M. Warren. (1997). “Having Second Thoughts: Student Perceptions before and after a Peer Assessment Exercise.” Studies in Higher Education. 11.1: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1999). “Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 24.3: 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. (2003). “Being Outside and Inside: Dialogic Identity and Intercultural Communication through Drama in Teaching English as an International Language.” PhD diss., Durham University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (2012). “Using Diamond Ranking as Visual Cues to Engage Young People in the Research Process.” Qualitative Research Journal. 12.2: 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, V., and C. Montgomery. (Eds.). (2011). Moving towards Internationalization of the Curriculum. Oxford: Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R., D. Kember, A. Sivan, and M. Wu. (1993). “Peer Assessment of an Individual’s Group Project.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 18: 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushner, K., and A. Karim. (2004). “Study Abroad at the University Level.” In D. Landis, J. Bennett, and M. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of Intercultural Training (3d ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 289–308.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2003). The Future of Higher Education. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., and L. McDowell. (1997). “Assessment as a Tool for Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation. 23.4: 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. (1999). “The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education. 24.3: 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecclestone, K., and J. Pryor. (2003). “‘Learning Careers’ or Assessment Careers’? The Impact of Assessment Systems on Learning.” British Educational Research Journal. 29.4: 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (2013). “Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education.” Review of Educational Research. 83.1: 70–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (1986). “Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self-Assessments.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 11: 146–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (1995). “Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Training International. 32: 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2005). Improving Assessment through Student Involvement. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. (2000). “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research. 70: 287–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2004). “Foreign Students’ Education and Culture Shock.” The Psychologist. 17: 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatfield, T. (1999). “Examining Student Satisfaction with Group Projects and Peer Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 24.4: 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q., and M. Schweisfurth. (2011). “Rethinking University Internationalisation: Towards Transformative Change.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 17.6: 611–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, N., and N. Peacock. (2010). “Interactions in the International Classroom: The UK Perspective.” In E. Jones (Ed.), Internationalization and the Student Voice: Higher Education Perspectives. New York: Routledge. 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEA (Higher Education Academy). (2012). “Annual Report.” http://wales.heacad-emy.ac.uk/assets/documents/aboutus/HEA_Annual_Report_2012–13.PDF (accessed June 28, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (2013). “Internationalization and Employability: The Role of Intercultural Experiences in the Development of Transferable Skills.” Public Money and Management. 33.2: 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killick, D. (2013). “Global Citizenship and Campus Community: Lessons from Learning Theory and the Lived-Experience of Mobile Students.” In J. Ryan (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Teaching and Teaming for Home and International Students: Internationalization of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London: Routledge. 182–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. (2009). “The Impact of an Elaborated Assessee’s Role in Peer Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 34: 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (2007). “Contradictions of Assessment for Learning in Institutions of Higher Learning.” In D. Boud and N. Falchnikov (Eds.), Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: learning for the longer Term. New York: Routledge. 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leask, B. (2007). “International Teachers and International Learners.” In E. Jones and S. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising Higher Education. Oxon: Routledge. 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loddington, S., K. Pond, N. Wilkinson, and P. Willmot. (2009). “A Case Study of the Development of WebPA: An Online Peer-Moderated Tool.” British Journal of Educational Technology. 40: 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, M., and J. Greatorex. (2000). “Application of Number: An Investigation into a Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Production and Reproduction of Pedagogical Practices.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, University of Cardiff, UK, September 7–9, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, L., and G. Mowl. (1996). “Innovative Assessment—Its Impact on Students.” In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving Student learning through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development. 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R., and S. Woodfield. (2007). Responding to the Internationalization Agenda: Implications for Institutional Strategy. York: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2004). Internationalisation of Higher Education: Policy Brief. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollin, R. (2008). “Silent pedagogy and rethinking classroom practice: Structuring teaching through silence rather than talk.” Cambridge Journal of Education, 38.2: 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., and L. R. Tropp. (2000). “Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings.” In S. Oskamp (ed.), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination. The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, P. J., D. M. A. Sluijsmans, P. A. Kirschner, and J.-W. Strijbos. (2005). “Formative Peer Assessment in a CSCL Environment: A Case Study.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 30: 417–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, S. (2011). “Internationalization: A Transformative Agenda for Higher Education?” Teachers and Teaching. 17.6: 619–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockett, M., and S. Percival. (2002). Thinking for Learning. Stafford: Network Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (Ed.). (2013). Cross-Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalization of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. (2006). “The Successors to Confucianism or a New Generation? A Questionnaire Study on Chinese Students’ Culture of Learning English.” Language, Culture and Curriculum. 19.1: 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluijsmans, D. M. A., and J. J. G. Van Merrienboer. (2000). A Peer Assessment Model. Heerlen, Netherlands: Center for Educational Technology and Expertise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., and D. Sluijsmans. (2010). “Unravelling Peer Assessment: Methodological, Functional, and Conceptual Developments.” Learning and Instruction. 20: 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. J. (1998). “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research. 68: 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2000). Peer Assisted Learning: A Practical Guide for Teachers. Cambridge: Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2010). “Methodological Quandaries in Studying Process and Outcomes in Peer Assessment: Commentary.” Learning and Instruction. 20.4: 339–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H., and J. Pryor. (1998). Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Y. (2013). “Pathologies of Silence? Reflection on International Learner Identities amidst the Classroom Chatter.” In J. Ryan (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalization of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London: Routledge. 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Y., and S. Robson. (2008). Internationalizing the University. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Pol, J., B. A. M. van den Berg, W. F. Admiral, and P. R. J. Simons. (2008). “The Nature, Reception, and Use of Online Peer Feedback in Higher Education.” Computers and Education. 51: 1804–1817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickerman, P. (2009). “Student Perspectives on Formative Peer Assessment: An Attempt to Deepen Learning?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 34: 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu, T., and G. Dall’Alba. (2007). “Students’ Experience of Peer Assessment in a Professional Course.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 32.5: 541–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., S. Bochner, and A. Furnham. (2001). The Psychology of Culture Shock. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, L. L., and C. Tsai. (2006). “University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward (Online) Peer Assessment.” Higher Education. 51: 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1992). “Student Attitudes towards Approaches to Learning and Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 17: 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, Y. (2005). “Learning Styles and Typologies of Cultural Differences: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 29.5: 521–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Gordon E. Slethaug Jane Vinther

Copyright information

© 2015 Gordon E. Slethaug and Jane Vinther

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fan, M., Robson, S., Leat, D. (2015). International Postgraduate Students’ Perceptions and Experiences of Peer Assessment in a UK University: A Case Study. In: Slethaug, G.E., Vinther, J. (eds) International Teaching and Learning at Universities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137475145_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics