Advertisement

Personal Experience and Cultural Awareness as Resources in Teaching Intercultural Communication: A Hong Kong Case Study

Chapter

Abstract

The first line of Kipling’s famous poem has often been quoted in isolation as an example of the author’s pessimistic attitudes toward race and the Empire, but the essential point is actually in the final line: When people meet—face to face—race, nationality, class, and geography cease to exist as dividing lines between people. The refrain from Kipling’s poem is still relevant today. Research shows that when people have no first-hand experience with people from other ethnic or cultural groups, they tend to rely on stereotypical accounts they get from the media or from other people, and the result is often prejudice and cultural generalizations. But if they meet and have personal encounters with “the other,” the stereotypes they form tend to be more positive (see, for example, Kashima, Fiedler, and Freytag 2008; Ladegaard 2011c).

Keywords

Chinese Student Cultural Awareness Exchange Student Intercultural Communication Local Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Augoustinos, M., I. Walker, and S. Donaghue. (2006). Social Cognition. An Integrated Introduction (2d ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., C. Nickerson, and B. Planken. (2007). Business Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Beebe, L., and H. Giles. (1984). “Speech-Accommodation Theories: A Discussion in Terms of Second Language Acquisition.” International Journal of the Sociology of language. 46: 5–32.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, M. H., V. Žegarac, and H. Spencer-Oatey. (2000). “Culture as an Explanatory Variable: Problems and Possibilities.” In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum. 47–71.Google Scholar
  5. Bredella, L. (2003). “What Does It Mean to Be Intercultural?” In G. Aired, M. Byram, and M. Fleming (Eds.), Intercultural Experience and Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 225–239.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, P., and S. Levinson. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. —. (2008). From Foreign language Education to Education for Intercultural Citizenship. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. Byram, M., and F. Dervin. (Eds.). (2008). Students, Staff and Academic Mobility in Higher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. The Critical Thinking Community, (2014). “Defining Critical Thinking.” Accessed August 18, 2014. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/410Google Scholar
  11. Every, D., and M. Augoustinos. (2007). “Constructions of Racism in the Australian Parliamentary Debates on Asylum Seekers.” Discourse and Society. 18.4: 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallois, C., T. Ogay, and H. Giles. (2005). “Speech Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Iheorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 121–148.Google Scholar
  13. Grant, N. (2007). “Intercultural education in the United Kingdom.” In D. Wood-row, G. K. Verma, M. B. Rocha-Triande, G. Campini, and C. Bagley (Eds.), Intercultural Education: Theories, Policies and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate. 135–156.Google Scholar
  14. Guilherme, M. (2004). “Intercultural Competence.” In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of language Teaching and learning. London: Routledge. 297–300.Google Scholar
  15. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson, J. (2010). Intercultural Journeys: From Study to Residence Abroad. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jandt, F. (2007). An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Jiang, X. (2006). “Towards Intercultural Communication: From Micro to Macro Perspectives.” Intercultural Education. 17.4: 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kashima, Y., K. Fiedler, and P. Freytag. (2008). Stereotype Dynamics. language-Based Approaches to the Formation, Maintenance and Transformation of Stereotypes. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Kim, J., and S. H. Ng. (2008). “Perceptions of Social Changes and Social Identity: Study Focusing on Hong Kong Society after Reunification.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 11:232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knight, J. (2011a). “Five Myths about Internationalization.” International Higher Education. 62: 14–15.Google Scholar
  22. —. (2011b). “Regional Education Hubs: Mobility for the Knowledge Economy.” In R. Bhandari and P. Blumenthal (Eds.), International Students and Global Mobility in Higher Education: National Trends and New Directions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 211–230.Google Scholar
  23. Ladegaard, H. J. (2011a). “Discourses of Identity: Outgroup Stereotypes and Strategies of Discursive Boundary-Making in Chinese Students’ Online Discussions about ‘the Other,’” Journal of Multicultural Discourses. 6.2: 1–21.Google Scholar
  24. —. (2011b) “Stereotypes and the Discursive Accomplishment of Intergroup Differentiation: Talking about ‘the Other’ in a Global Business Organization.” Pragmatics. 21.1: 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. —. (2011c). “Stereotypes in the Making: Prejudice and Cultural Generalizations in Hong Kong Students’ Discourse.” Journal of Asian Pacific Communication. 21.2: 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ladegaard, H. J., and H. F. Cheng. (2014). “Constructing the Cultural Other: Prejudice and Intergroup Conflict in University Students’ Discourses about the Other.” Language and Intercultural Communication. 14.2: 156–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lam, C. M. H. (2006). “Reciprocal Adjustment by Host and Sojourning Groups: Mainland Chinese Students in Hong Kong.” In M. Byram and A. Feng (Eds.), Living and Studying Abroad: Research and Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 91–107.Google Scholar
  28. Scollon, R., and S. W. Scollon. (2001). Intercultural Communication. A Discourse Approach (2d ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, M., and M. H. Bond. (1998). Social Psychology across Cultures (2d ed.). London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Street, B. (1991). “Culture Is a Verb: Anthropological Aspects of Language and Cultural Process.” In D. Graddol, L. Thompson, and M. Byram (Eds.), Language and Culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 23–43.Google Scholar
  31. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Verma, G. K. (1997). “Pluralism and the Future of Multicultural Education.” In D. Woodrow, G. K. Verma, M. B. Rocha-Triandade, G. Campini, and C. Bagley (Eds.), Intercultural Education: Theories, Policies and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate. 329–338.Google Scholar
  33. Wang, L., and H. J. Ladegaard. (2008). “Language Attitudes and Gender in China: Perceptions and Reported Use of Putonghua and Cantonese in the Southern Province of Guangdong.” Language Awareness. 17.1: 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gordon E. Slethaug and Jane Vinther 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations