Examining Liberal Education, its Place, and Importance in Transnational Education: How to Develop and Maintain Teacher and Learner Autonomy



Around the world discussion is bourgeoning on elements of quality in education: what constitutes it and how it can be developed and maintained. Only a few years ago the general idea was that the West had the answers to these questions and that the fast-growing economies in Asia, especially China, would benefit from adopting Western methods of teaching in their efforts to modernize educational practices. In the second decade of the twenty-first century it is becoming clear that the East also has something to offer and that a reciprocal exchange of experiences will bring both worlds forward to a broader understanding of the difficulties and the qualities of internationalization of education. As the flow of students on the move for experiences and education is becoming multidirectional as well as multilingual and multicultural, it is becoming essential that educational policy, educational institutions, and classroom practitioners take up the gauntlet of examining their own underlying assumptions and traditions with a view to making explicit to themselves and others where and in what they find value, what these values are, and how to bring this knowledge into play with new frameworks. With this purpose in mind, the philosophies of the European tradition of free and independent universities within the heritage of the Enlightenment will be examined, and the merits as well as less fortunate developments put into relief against the current discussion of difficulties with internationalization and the creation of a new educational framework.


Social Capital Educational System Liberal Education Functional Skill European Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AAC&U (Association of American Colleges and Universities). (2014). “Liberal Education.” Accessed April 15, 2014. Scholar
  2. Allchin, M. A. (1997). N. F. S. Gundtvig: An Introduction to his Life and Work. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allchin, A. M., S. A. J. Bradley, N. A. Hjelm, and J. H. Schørring. (Eds). (2000). Grundtvig in International Perspective. Aaarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  4. The Chronicle of Higher Education and American Public Media’s Marketplace. (2012). “The Role of Higher Education in Career Development: Employer Perceptions.” Accessed April 18, 2014.
  5. Corey, D. D. (2013). “Liberal Education: Its Conditions and Ends. Perspectives on Political Science.” 42.4: 195–200.Google Scholar
  6. Dawra, P. (2014). “Pericles Lewis: Rethinking Liberal Arts Education.” Live Mint & The Wall Street Journal, February 20. Accessed April 15, 2014.
  7. Fischer, K. (2013). “The Employment Mismatch: A College Degree Sorts Job Applicants but Employers Wish Degrees Meant More.” Accessed April 15, 2014. Scholar
  8. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Graber, R. B. (2014). “Why is liberal education so incoherent? An anthropological persepctive.” On the Horizon, 22(1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gundem, B. B. (2000). “Understanding European Didactics.” In B. Moon, M. B. Ben-Peretz, and S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge International Companion to Education. London: Routledge. 235–262.Google Scholar
  11. Hanstedt, P. (2012a). General Education Essentials: A Guide for College Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. —. (2012b). “When Introducing the Liberal Arts to Asia, Don’t Forget the Students.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, June 5. Accessed April 12, 2014.,%20Don%27t%20Forget%20the%20Students.pdf
  13. Ho, S. S. M. (2012). “Nurturing Core Competencies: Theory, Practice and Challenges of General Education.” Accessed April 14, 2014. Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1784). Beantwortung der Frage: Was Ist Aufklärung? [Answer the Question: What Is Enlightenment?] Berlinische Monatsschrift Book 4 (December). 481–494. D. F. Ferrer, trans. (2013).
  15. Kimball, B. A. (1996). “A Historical Perspective.” In N. Farnham and A. Yarmolinsky (Eds.), Rethinking liberal Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 11–35.Google Scholar
  16. Klafki, W. (2000). “The Significance of Classical Theories of Bildung for a Contemporary Concept of Allgemeinbildung.” In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, and K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition. New York: Routledge. 85–107.Google Scholar
  17. Lew, S.-C., M. H. Chang, and Y. Bae. (2002). “Good Government, Social Capital, and Trust: Korea, Japan, Denmark and Sweden.” Korean Social Science Journal. 29.2: 35–73.Google Scholar
  18. Maguire Associates. (2012). “The Role of Higher Education in Career Development: Employer Perceptions.” Accessed April 15, 2014. Scholar
  19. Nybom, T. (2007). “A Rule-Governed Community of Scholars: The Humboldt Vision in the History of the European University.” In P. Maasen and J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration. Berlin: Springer. 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ozga, J., P. Dahler-Larsen, C. Segerhold, and H. Simola. (Eds.). (2011). Fabricating Quality in Education. Data and Governance in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Pangle, L. S. (2013). “Reclaiming the Core: Liberal Education in the Twenty-First Century.” Perspectives on Political Science. 42.4: 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paxton, P. (1999). “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology. 105.1: 88–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. PISA (Program for International Student Assessment). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
  24. Putnam, R. D. (Forthcoming). Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  25. Tange, H. (2010). “Caught in the Tower of Babel: University Lecturers’ Experiences with Internationalisation.” Language and Intercultural Communication. 10.2: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vinther, J. (2010). “A Danish Perspective on Teaching Chinese Students in Europe.” In J. Ryan and G. Slethaug (Eds.), The Chinese Learner and International Education. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 111–127.Google Scholar
  27. Vinther, J., and G. Slethaug. (2013a). “The Danish Educational Tradition: Multiple Heritages and International Challenges and ‘Conversation’.” In L. Jin and M. Cortazzi (Eds.), Researching Intercultural Learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 58–77.Google Scholar
  28. —. (2013b). “The Influence of Internationalisation and National Identity on Teaching and Assessments in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education. 18.7: 797–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Welsch, W. (1998). “Rationality and Reason Today.” In D. R. Gordon and J. Niznik (Eds.), Criticism and Defense of Rationality in Contemporary Philosophy. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 17–31. Scholar
  30. Zucker, Lynne. (1986). “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840–1920.” Research in Organizational Behavior. 8: 51–111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gordon E. Slethaug and Jane Vinther 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations