Skip to main content

The Eurasian Vector of Russia’s Development

  • Chapter

Abstract

The ‘civilizational’ and particularly ‘Eurasianist’ discourse has recently become a firmly integral part of the official political rhetoric in such countries as Russia, Kazakhstan and, perhaps to a lesser extent, Belarus. In fact, the words seem to match the deeds: the proposed Eurasian economic integration appears to be a decisive step in implementing this discourse, and seems to fit quite well with the theorizing of Samuel L. Huntington, who suggested that the most likely scenario for the reconstitution of international relations after the collapse of the Soviet Union would be a rise in the role of civilizational identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. D. McCloskey, The Bourgeois Virtues. Ethics for an Age of Commerce (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. D. North, J. Wallis and B. Weingast, Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012);

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Clark, A Farewell to Alms. A Brief Economic History of the World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Kolodko, Truths, Errors and Lies. Politics and Economics in a Volatile World (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), p. 310.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Mouzelis, ‘Modernity: A Non-European Conceptualization’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1999, p. 153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Wittrok, ‘Modernity: One, None or Many? European Origins and Modernity as a Global Condition’, Daedalus, Vol. 129, No. 1, 2000, pp. 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Braudel, Grammatika tsivilizatsii (Moscow: Ves Mir, 2008), pp. 502, 504.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See, for instance, R. Pipes, Property and Freedom (New York: Vintage, 2000), 2 and B. Mironov, Sotsialnaya istoriya Rossii perioda imperii. XVIII — nachalo XX. Genezis lichnosti, demokraticheskoi sem’i, grazhdanskogo obshchestva, pravovogo gosudarstva (Volume 1 of 2). 2-e izdanie (Saint-Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulavin, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Ayatskov (ed.), Sobstvennost’ na zemlyu v Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost’ (Moscow: ROSPEN, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Castells, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I. The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1997), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A similar viewpoint is contained in the theory advanced by Russian economist O. Bessonova, who also believes that the Russian economy has always been essentially redistributive from the 19th until the 20th century. Although in each cycle of its development it may have attained a certain similarity to Western societies by adopting their formal institutions, Russia has never succeeded in completely reformatting its institutional matrix. See O. Bessonova, Razdatochnaya ekonomika Rossii. Evolutsiya bez transformatsii (Moscow: ROSPEN, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Trubetzkoy, The Legacy of Genghis Khan and other Essays on Russia’s Identity (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Vernadsky, A History of Russia. New, Revised Edition (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See also L. Gumilev, Ritmy Evrazii. Epokhi i tsivilizatsii (Moscow: Ekopros, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Trubetzkoy, The Legacy of Genghis Khan and other Essays on Russia’s Identity (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu. Lotman, Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Vypusk 15 (Tartu: Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Khanna, How to Run the World: Charting a Course to the Next Renaissance (New York: Random House, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. In achieving their success, these states seem to effectively exploit the principles of conservatism. For a detailed discussion, see L. Ionin, Apdeit konservatizma (Moscow: ID GU-VShE, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Krichevsky, ‘Ekonomika, kotoruyu my obretaem’, Novaya Gazeta, 23 December 2013, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Ovsey Shkaratan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shkaratan, O. (2015). The Eurasian Vector of Russia’s Development. In: Lane, D., Samokhvalov, V. (eds) The Eurasian Project and Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472960_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics