Abstract
My interest in insatiability was triggered off by Keynes’s prediction in 1930 that 100 years hence people in rich countries would have enough, and therefore work less. This was based on an assumption about productivity growth. That prediction turned out to be partly wrong. Although average incomes have risen, much in line with Keynes’s prediction, average hours of work have fallen much less. This suggested that he underestimated human insatiability. My son Edward and I wrote a book called How Much Is Enough?, which was an inquiry into the meaning and causes of insatiability. This is a further exploration of that topic, which suggests one or two modifications of the view we took in the book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
James Buchan, Frozen Desire: An Inquiry into the Meaning of Money (London: Picador, 1998).
John Maynard Keynes, Essays in Persuasion, in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. 9 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), p. 293.
Lorenzo Pecchi and Gustavo Piga (eds), Revisiting Keynes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010).
Alan D. Viard and Robert Carroll, Progressive Consumption Tax: The X-Tax Revisited (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skidelsky, E., Skidelsky, R. (2015). Restraining Insatiability. In: Skidelsky, E., Skidelsky, R. (eds) Are Markets Moral?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472748_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472748_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47273-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47274-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)