Skip to main content

Regulatory Environments and the Location Decision: Evidence from the Early Foreign Market Entries of New-Technology-based Firms

  • Chapter

Abstract

New-technology-based firms (NTBFs) embarking on a strategy of rapid internationalisation choose foreign market entries that minimise transaction costs and the related risks of failure. Means to reduce the young firms’ vulnerability to the appropriation of intellectual capital are particularly important influences on early foreign market choices. We explore the effect of the institutional dimension, specifically the national regulatory environment, on the location choices and the speed of internationalisation by British and German NTBFs. We provide evidence that entrepreneurial young firms choose to enter country markets offering better regulatory protection for their intellectual property. This decision is moderated by a home regulatory regime bias. In contrast, we observe that the speed of internationalisation is influenced less by the foreign regulatory regime and more by industry and firm characteristics. We also observe that managerial experience influences the location choices of NTBFs facing regulatory hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, E., & Coughlan, A. 1987. International market entry and expansion via independent or integrated channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 51(1): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign market entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 2000. The internationalisation of the firm from an entrepreneurial perspective. International Studies of Management and Organisation, 30(1): 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenius, P. 2005. The psychic distance postulate revised: From market selection to speed of market penetration. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(2): 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. 2005. Creative tension: The significance of Ben Oviatt’s and Patricia McDougall’s article ‘toward a theory of international new ventures’. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1): 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Sapienza, H., & Almeida, J. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 909–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H., & Vermeulen, F. 1997. What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4): 846–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H., Bell, J., & Pennings, J. 1996. Foreign entiy, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 1989. The economics of property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benito, G., & Gripsrud, G. 1992. The expansion of foreign direct investment: Discrete rational location choices or a cultural learning process? Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3): 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. (Ed.) 2004. What is international business? Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgel, O., Fier, O., Licht, G., & Murray, G. C. 2004. The internationalization of young high-tech firms: An empirical analysis in Germany and the United Kingdom. ZEW Economic Studies 22. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart, R. 1987. A new UK definition of high-technology industries. Economic Trends, 400(February): 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., & Dunkelberg, W. 1986. Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1): 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E., & Munro, H. 1995. Growing the entrepreneurial firm: Networking for international market development. European Journal of Marketing, 29(7): 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, R. 2006. Why do most firms die young? Small Business Economics, 26(2): 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. 1980. The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country characteristics and experience effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 11 (2): 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L., & North, D. 1971. Institutional change and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Sapienza, H., & Crijns, H. 2005. The internationalization of small and medium-sized firms: The role of organizational learning effort and entrepreneurial orientation. Small Business Economics, 24(4): 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Beamish, P. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10): 915–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Henisz, W. 2003. Political uncertainty and the sequence of entry by Japanese firms 1980–1998. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3): 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitratos, P., & Jones, M. V. 2005. Guest editorial: Future directions for international entrepreneurship research. International Business Review, 14(2): 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2002. The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1): 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. 1997. Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy, 26(3): 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., & Shleifer, A. 2002. Legal origins. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4): 1193–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoom, J., Cloodt, D., & van Kranenburg, H. 2005. Intellectual property rights and the governance of international R&D partnerships. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. 2000. The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 16(2): 334–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. -F. 1986. What is internalization? Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 122(4): 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. 1990. The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4): 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. 2004. Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(3): 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. 1997. Country institutional profiles: Concept and measurement. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings: 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(5): 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1999. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1): 222–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., & Beamish, P. 2006. SME internationalization and performance: Growth vs profitability. Journal of Inteenational Entrepreneurship, 4(1): 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T., & Servais, P. 1997. The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process? International Business Review, 6(6): 561–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, X., & Salomon, R. 2003. Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4): 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, B. 1992. Order of entry and performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal, 13(3): 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P., & Oviatt, B. 2000. International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 902–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. 1994. Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6): 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD 1997. The Oslo manual: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, S., & Lane, H. 1996. The psychic distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2): 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostergard, R. 2000. The measurement of intellectual property rights protection. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2): 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1): 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. 1995. Global start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(2): 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. 2005. Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29 (5): 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J. 1997. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 13(2): 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J. 1999. Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38(3): 283–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, S., Miles, G., & Beats, M. 1998. Explaining the international intensity and global diversity of early-stage technology-based firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3): 259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitzig, M. 2004. Strategic management of intellectual property. Sloan Management Review, 45(3): 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rialp, A., Rialp, J., & Knight, G. A. 2005. The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific enquiry? International Business Review, 14(2): 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. 2006. A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 914–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, R. 2001. Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: The case of young high-technology manufacturing firms. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1): 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, R., Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. 2000. How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons from the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): 1227–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D., & Tether, B. 1998. New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26(9): 933–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, B., & Vertinsky, I. 1996. Foreign direct investment by Japanese electronics firms in the United States and Canada: Modelling the timing of entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4): 655–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. 1986. Transaction cost economics and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7(1): 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. 2000. Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, S., & Amit, R. 2003. Learning about failure: Bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organization Science, 14(5): 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank 2006. Doing business in 2006: Creating jobs. Washington, DC: World Bank and International Finance Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. 2005. A theory of international ventures: A decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1): 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Ireland, R., & Hitt, M. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 925–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Journal of International Business Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coeurderoy, R., Murray, G. (2014). Regulatory Environments and the Location Decision: Evidence from the Early Foreign Market Entries of New-Technology-based Firms. In: Cantwell, J. (eds) Location of International Business Activities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472311_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics