Abstract
Spurred by the classic work of Dunning, MNE location has become the focus of a growing body of research in the field. In this paper we argue that international business (IB) research examining the spatial dimension has serious weaknesses, stemming from its traditional assumption of the country as the location unit of analysis. While border-crossing remains the key research context of IB, placing it within a general spatial framework that recognizes both international and subnational spatial heterogeneity opens up vastnew vistas for research. Analyzing MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises allows the researcher to distinguish between (discrete) border effects and (continuous) distance effects and undertake a more fine-grained analysis of location. Within such analysis national borders may appear as qualitative discontinuities in space, that is, points at which spatial heterogeneity changes abruptly. However, subnational spatial heterogeneity is often the characteristic that drives firm strategy as MNEs decide to locate in parfiicular agglomerations and not at random locations within a country. The complex firms that lB scholars study typically include multiple units within the same country, so that a complete analysis requires considering both subnational distance effects as well as international border effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcacer, J., Dezső, C., & Zhao, M. 2013. Firm rivalry, knowledge accumulation, and MNE location choices. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 504–520.
Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 155–165.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2001. Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs: A multi-level analysis. Organization Studies, 22(6): 1013–1034.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979–996.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bello, D. C., & Kostova, T. 2012. From the Editors: Conducting high impact international business research: The role of theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(6): 537–534.
Berry, H., Guillen, M., & Zhou, N. 2010. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1460–1480.
Beugelsdijk, S. 2007. The regional environment and a firm’s innovative performance: A plea for a multi-level interactionist approach. Economic Geography, 83(2): 181–199.
Beugelsdijk, S. 2011. Location specific advantages and liability of foreignness: Time, space and relative advantage. In C. G. Asmussen, T. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds), Advances in International Management: 181–210. Amsterdam: JAI Press.
Beugelsdijk, S., Brakman, S., Van Ees, H., & Garretsen, H. 2013. Firms in the international economy: Firm heterogeneity meets international business. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Beugelsdijk, S., Hennart, J. F., & Slangen, A. 2011. The impact of cultural distance on US arm’s length exports: An international business perspective. Management International Review, 51(6): 875–896.
Beugelsdijk, S., Mudambi, R., & McCann, P. 2010. Place, space and organization: Economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4): 485–493.
Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74.
Buckley, P. J. 2002. Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 365–373.
Campbell, J., Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. 2012. Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1): 84–106.
Cantwell, J. A. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 35–41.
Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109–1128.
Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2011. Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4): 206–232.
Cantwell, J. A., & Santangelo, G. 1999. The frontier of international technology networks: Sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capabilities. Information Economics and Policy, 11(1): 101–123.
Casson, M. 1987. The firm and the market: Studies in multinational enterprises and the scope of the firm. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chaney, 2008. Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review, 98(4): 1707–1721.
Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. 2004. ‘Globalizing’ regional development: Global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4): 468–484.
Cooke, P. 2001. Biotechnology clusters in the UK: Lessons from localization in the commercialization of science. Small Business Economics, 17(1–2): 43–59.
Dai, L., Eden, L., & Beamish, P. W. 2013. Place, space and geographical exposure: Foreign subsidiary survival in conflict zones. Journal of International Business Studies, advance online publication 18 April. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.12.
D’Este, P., Guy, F., & Iammarino, 2012. Shaping the formation of universityindustry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, first published online 2 May. doi: 10.1093/jeg/ lbs010.
Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, H. 2001. Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analyzing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2): 89–112.
Dicken, P., & Malmberg, A. 2001. Firms in territories: A relational perspective. Economic Geography, 77(4): 345–363.
Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 45–66.
Dunning, J. H. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise: John Dunning’s thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 Decade Award. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 20–34.
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy, (2nd edn). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Dunning, J. H., & Norman, G. 1983. The theory of the multinational enterprise: An application to multinational office location. Environment and Planning A, 15(5): 675–692.
Em, L. 2011. Disentangling the different concepts of distance: A lexicographic exploration of the past 20 years of the Journal of International Business Studies. Paper presented at Academy of International Business Annual Conference, Nagoya, Japan.
Feynman, R. 1988. QED: The strange theory of light and matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Flores, R., Aguilera, R., Mahdian, A., & Vaaler, P. 2013. How well do supra-national regional grouping schemes fit international business research models? Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 451–474.
Florida, R., & Kenney, M. 1991. Transplanted organizations: The transfer of Japanese industrial organization to the US. American Sociological Review, 56(3): 381–398.
Frost, T. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 101–123.
Gertler, M. S. 1995. ‘Being there’: Proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography, 71(1): 1–26.
Gertler, M. S. 2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being there. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 75–99.
Gertler, M. S., & Levitte, Y. M. 2005. Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation, 12(4): 487–507.
Ghemawat, P. 2011. The World 3.0: Global prosperity and how to achieve it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Giuliani, E. 2007. The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(2): 139–168.
Goerzen, A., Asmussen, C. G., & Nielsen, B. 2013. Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 427–450.
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. 2009. Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3): 1095–1131.
Head, K., & Mayer, T. 2010. Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. In S. Brakman & P. van Bergeijk (Eds), The gravity model in international trade: Advances and applications: 165–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heidenreich, M. 2012. Innovation and institutional embeddedness of multinational companies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3): 436–464.
Hennart, J.-F. 2007. The theoretical rationale for a multinationality/performance relationship. Management International Review, 47(3): 307–317.
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. 2013. Multinational and economic geography: Location, technology, and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577–598.
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. 1982. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1): 7–20.
Kim, T. Y., Delios, A., & Xu, D. 2010. Organizational geography, experiential learning, and subsidiary exit: Japanese foreign expansions in China, 1979–2001. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4): 579–597.
Klier, T., & McMillen, D. P. 2008. Evolving agglomeration in the US auto supplier industry. Journal of Regional Science, 48(1): 235–267.
Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., & Tripathy, A. 2012. Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4): 368–395.
Lorenzen, M. 2007. Social capital and localized learning: Proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics. Urban Studies, 44(4): 799–817.
Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 501–534.
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. 2007. Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1): 60–70.
Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. 2002. The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34(3): 429–449.
Mariotti, S., Piscitello, L., & Elia, S. 2010. Spatial agglomeration of multinational enterprises: The role of information externalities and knowledge spillovers. Joumal of Economic Geography, 10(4): 519–538.
Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. 2011. Notes on CEPII’s distances measures (GeoDist). CEPII Working Paper 2011–25.
McCallum, J. 1995. National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. American Economic Review, 85(3): 615–623.
McCann, P. 2011. International business and economic geography: Knowledge, time and transaction costs. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2): 309–317.
McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2004. The location behavior of the multinational enterprise: Some analytical issues. Growth and Change, 35(4): 491–524.
McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2005. Analytical differences in the economics of geography: The case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning A, 37(10): 1857–1876.
Miller, S. R., Thomas, D. E., Eden, L., & Hitt, M. 2008. Knee deep in the big muddy: The survival of emerging market firms in developed markets. Management International Review, 48(6): 645–665.
Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64(2): 165–187.
Moulaert, T., & Sekia, F. 2003. Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3): 289–302.
Mudambi, R. 2002. Knowledge management in multinational firms. Journal of International Management, 8(1): 1–9.
Mudambi, 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal ofEconomic Geography, 8(5): 699–725.
Mudambi, R., Hannigan, T. J., & Kline, W. 2012. Advancing science on the knife’s edge: Integration and specialization in management Ph.D. programs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3): 83–105.
Mudambi, R., Mudambi, S., & Navarra, P. 2007. Global innovation in MNCs: The effects of subsidiary self-determination and teamwork. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(5): 442–455.
Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385–406.
Piscitello, L. 2011. Strategy, location, and the conceptual metamorphosis of the MNE. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1–2): 127–131.
Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. 2009. Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rugman, A. 1981. Inside the multinationals. London: Croom Helm.
Rugman, A. 2005. The regional multinationals: MNEs and ‘global’ strategic management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sassen, S. 2000. Territory and territoriality in the global economy. International Sociology, 15(2): 372–393.
Schmitt, A., & Van Biesebroeck, J. 2013. Proximity strategies in outsourcing relations: The role of geographical, cultural and relational proximity in the European automotive industry. Joumal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 475–503.
Schotter, A., & Beamish, P. 2013. The hassle factor: An explanation for managerial location shunning. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 521–544.
Scott, A. J. 1986. Industrial organization and location: Division of labor, the firm and spatial process. Economic Geography, 62(3): 215–231.
Scott, A. J. 1996. Regional motors in a global economy. Futures, 28(5): 391–411.
Scott, A. J., & Pope, N. 2007. Hollywood, Vancouver, and the world: Employment relocation and the emergence of satellite production centers in the motion picture industry. Environment and Planning A, 39(6): 1364–1381.
Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519–535.
Slangen, A. H. L., & Beugelsdijk, S. 2010. The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 980–995.
Slangen, A. H. L., & Hennart, J.-F. 2008. Do multinationals really prefer to enter culturally-distant countries through Greenfields rather than through acquisitions? The role of parent experience and subsidiary autonomy. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3): 472–490.
Slaughter, M. J. 2004. Insourcing jobs: Making the global economy work for America. Washington DC: The Organization for International Investment.
Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Hofstede, F. T. 2002. International market segmentation: Issues and perspectives. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(3): 185–213.
Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 27–43.
Talbott, S. 2007. The language of nature. The New Atlantis, 15(Winter): 41–76.
Thomas, D. C., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Brannen, M. Y. 2011. From the Editors: Explaining theoretical relationships in international business research: Focusing on the arrows, NOT the boxes. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(9): 1073–1078.
Verbeke, A. 2009. International business strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilkins, M. 2004. The history of foreign investment in the United States, 1914–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yeolekar, M. E., & Mehta, S. 2007. Medical and health research in India: Issues and directions. Journal of Association of Physicians of India, 55(August): 545–546.
Yeung, H. 2005. Rethinking relational economic geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1): 37–51.
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.
Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M., & Nachum, L. 2012. Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1): 18–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Journal of International Business Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beugelsdijk, S., Mudambi, R. (2014). MNEs as Border-Crossing Multi-location Enterprises: The Role of Discontinuities in Geographic Space. In: Cantwell, J. (eds) Location of International Business Activities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472311_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472311_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50122-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47231-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)