Skip to main content

MNEs as Border-Crossing Multi-location Enterprises: The Role of Discontinuities in Geographic Space

  • Chapter

Abstract

Spurred by the classic work of Dunning, MNE location has become the focus of a growing body of research in the field. In this paper we argue that international business (IB) research examining the spatial dimension has serious weaknesses, stemming from its traditional assumption of the country as the location unit of analysis. While border-crossing remains the key research context of IB, placing it within a general spatial framework that recognizes both international and subnational spatial heterogeneity opens up vastnew vistas for research. Analyzing MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises allows the researcher to distinguish between (discrete) border effects and (continuous) distance effects and undertake a more fine-grained analysis of location. Within such analysis national borders may appear as qualitative discontinuities in space, that is, points at which spatial heterogeneity changes abruptly. However, subnational spatial heterogeneity is often the characteristic that drives firm strategy as MNEs decide to locate in parfiicular agglomerations and not at random locations within a country. The complex firms that lB scholars study typically include multiple units within the same country, so that a complete analysis requires considering both subnational distance effects as well as international border effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alcacer, J., Dezső, C., & Zhao, M. 2013. Firm rivalry, knowledge accumulation, and MNE location choices. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 504–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2001. Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs: A multi-level analysis. Organization Studies, 22(6): 1013–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, D. C., & Kostova, T. 2012. From the Editors: Conducting high impact international business research: The role of theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(6): 537–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, H., Guillen, M., & Zhou, N. 2010. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1460–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S. 2007. The regional environment and a firm’s innovative performance: A plea for a multi-level interactionist approach. Economic Geography, 83(2): 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S. 2011. Location specific advantages and liability of foreignness: Time, space and relative advantage. In C. G. Asmussen, T. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds), Advances in International Management: 181–210. Amsterdam: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Brakman, S., Van Ees, H., & Garretsen, H. 2013. Firms in the international economy: Firm heterogeneity meets international business. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Hennart, J. F., & Slangen, A. 2011. The impact of cultural distance on US arm’s length exports: An international business perspective. Management International Review, 51(6): 875–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Mudambi, R., & McCann, P. 2010. Place, space and organization: Economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4): 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. 2002. Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. 2012. Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1): 84–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2011. Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4): 206–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A., & Santangelo, G. 1999. The frontier of international technology networks: Sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capabilities. Information Economics and Policy, 11(1): 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1987. The firm and the market: Studies in multinational enterprises and the scope of the firm. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, 2008. Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review, 98(4): 1707–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. 2004. ‘Globalizing’ regional development: Global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4): 468–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. 2001. Biotechnology clusters in the UK: Lessons from localization in the commercialization of science. Small Business Economics, 17(1–2): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, L., Eden, L., & Beamish, P. W. 2013. Place, space and geographical exposure: Foreign subsidiary survival in conflict zones. Journal of International Business Studies, advance online publication 18 April. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.12.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P., Guy, F., & Iammarino, 2012. Shaping the formation of universityindustry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, first published online 2 May. doi: 10.1093/jeg/ lbs010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, H. 2001. Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analyzing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2): 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., & Malmberg, A. 2001. Firms in territories: A relational perspective. Economic Geography, 77(4): 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise: John Dunning’s thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 Decade Award. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy, (2nd edn). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Norman, G. 1983. The theory of the multinational enterprise: An application to multinational office location. Environment and Planning A, 15(5): 675–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Em, L. 2011. Disentangling the different concepts of distance: A lexicographic exploration of the past 20 years of the Journal of International Business Studies. Paper presented at Academy of International Business Annual Conference, Nagoya, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. 1988. QED: The strange theory of light and matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, R., Aguilera, R., Mahdian, A., & Vaaler, P. 2013. How well do supra-national regional grouping schemes fit international business research models? Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 451–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., & Kenney, M. 1991. Transplanted organizations: The transfer of Japanese industrial organization to the US. American Sociological Review, 56(3): 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. 1995. ‘Being there’: Proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography, 71(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. 2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being there. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S., & Levitte, Y. M. 2005. Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation, 12(4): 487–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. 2011. The World 3.0: Global prosperity and how to achieve it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, E. 2007. The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(2): 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerzen, A., Asmussen, C. G., & Nielsen, B. 2013. Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. 2009. Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3): 1095–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, K., & Mayer, T. 2010. Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. In S. Brakman & P. van Bergeijk (Eds), The gravity model in international trade: Advances and applications: 165–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, M. 2012. Innovation and institutional embeddedness of multinational companies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3): 436–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. 2007. The theoretical rationale for a multinationality/performance relationship. Management International Review, 47(3): 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. 2013. Multinational and economic geography: Location, technology, and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. 1982. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. Y., Delios, A., & Xu, D. 2010. Organizational geography, experiential learning, and subsidiary exit: Japanese foreign expansions in China, 1979–2001. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4): 579–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klier, T., & McMillen, D. P. 2008. Evolving agglomeration in the US auto supplier industry. Journal of Regional Science, 48(1): 235–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., & Tripathy, A. 2012. Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4): 368–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, M. 2007. Social capital and localized learning: Proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics. Urban Studies, 44(4): 799–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 501–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. 2007. Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1): 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. 2002. The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34(3): 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, S., Piscitello, L., & Elia, S. 2010. Spatial agglomeration of multinational enterprises: The role of information externalities and knowledge spillovers. Joumal of Economic Geography, 10(4): 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. 2011. Notes on CEPII’s distances measures (GeoDist). CEPII Working Paper 2011–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, J. 1995. National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. American Economic Review, 85(3): 615–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P. 2011. International business and economic geography: Knowledge, time and transaction costs. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2): 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2004. The location behavior of the multinational enterprise: Some analytical issues. Growth and Change, 35(4): 491–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2005. Analytical differences in the economics of geography: The case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning A, 37(10): 1857–1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. R., Thomas, D. E., Eden, L., & Hitt, M. 2008. Knee deep in the big muddy: The survival of emerging market firms in developed markets. Management International Review, 48(6): 645–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64(2): 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, T., & Sekia, F. 2003. Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3): 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. 2002. Knowledge management in multinational firms. Journal of International Management, 8(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal ofEconomic Geography, 8(5): 699–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., Hannigan, T. J., & Kline, W. 2012. Advancing science on the knife’s edge: Integration and specialization in management Ph.D. programs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3): 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., Mudambi, S., & Navarra, P. 2007. Global innovation in MNCs: The effects of subsidiary self-determination and teamwork. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(5): 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piscitello, L. 2011. Strategy, location, and the conceptual metamorphosis of the MNE. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1–2): 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. 2009. Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. 1981. Inside the multinationals. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. 2005. The regional multinationals: MNEs and ‘global’ strategic management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 2000. Territory and territoriality in the global economy. International Sociology, 15(2): 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, A., & Van Biesebroeck, J. 2013. Proximity strategies in outsourcing relations: The role of geographical, cultural and relational proximity in the European automotive industry. Joumal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 475–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A., & Beamish, P. 2013. The hassle factor: An explanation for managerial location shunning. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 521–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. 1986. Industrial organization and location: Division of labor, the firm and spatial process. Economic Geography, 62(3): 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. 1996. Regional motors in a global economy. Futures, 28(5): 391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., & Pope, N. 2007. Hollywood, Vancouver, and the world: Employment relocation and the emergence of satellite production centers in the motion picture industry. Environment and Planning A, 39(6): 1364–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slangen, A. H. L., & Beugelsdijk, S. 2010. The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 980–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slangen, A. H. L., & Hennart, J.-F. 2008. Do multinationals really prefer to enter culturally-distant countries through Greenfields rather than through acquisitions? The role of parent experience and subsidiary autonomy. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3): 472–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, M. J. 2004. Insourcing jobs: Making the global economy work for America. Washington DC: The Organization for International Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Hofstede, F. T. 2002. International market segmentation: Issues and perspectives. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(3): 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, S. 2007. The language of nature. The New Atlantis, 15(Winter): 41–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. C., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Brannen, M. Y. 2011. From the Editors: Explaining theoretical relationships in international business research: Focusing on the arrows, NOT the boxes. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(9): 1073–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A. 2009. International business strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 2004. The history of foreign investment in the United States, 1914–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeolekar, M. E., & Mehta, S. 2007. Medical and health research in India: Issues and directions. Journal of Association of Physicians of India, 55(August): 545–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. 2005. Rethinking relational economic geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1): 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M., & Nachum, L. 2012. Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1): 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Journal of International Business Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beugelsdijk, S., Mudambi, R. (2014). MNEs as Border-Crossing Multi-location Enterprises: The Role of Discontinuities in Geographic Space. In: Cantwell, J. (eds) Location of International Business Activities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137472311_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics