Advertisement

Heir Apparent: Vice Presidents

  • Theresa Marchant-Shapiro
Part of the The Evolving American Presidency Series book series (EAP)

Abstract

The goal of the Constitution in instituting the Electoral College was to assure that the presidency was conferred upon the most meritorious individual in the country. The runner up would be named as vice president in order to assure that in the event of death or disability of the president the next most meritorious individual would be in position to take over the leadership of the country. From this position of respect, if not of responsibility, the vice president became the heir apparent to the president. As Connecticut Representative Elizur Goodrich wrote, “By instituting the office of Vice-President, the Constitution contemplates a success; it means to provide a candidate on probation for the Presidency; it means to avoid the evils of hereditary succession and the turbulence of the public mind being entirely left afloat.”1 The public mind could be confident that a meritorious heir was prepared to be the next president. On his ascension to the presidency, Chester Arthur thought that the system was a success, “No higher or more assuring proof could exist of the strength and permanence of popular government than the fact that though the chosen of the people be struck down, her constitutional successor is peacefully installed, without shock or strain, except the sorrow which mourn the benevolent.”2 The Constitution is a success to the degree that it provides a formal mechanism for replacing the president.

Keywords

Democratic Party Vice President Party Leader Presidential Candidate Electoral College 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    As quoted in Louis Clinton Hatch, A History of the Vice-Presidency of the United States (New York: American Historical Society, 1934), 121.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joel K. Goldstein, The Modern American Vice Presidency: The Transformation of a Political Institution (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982), 212.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. B. Learned, “Some Aspects of the Vice-Presidency,” The American Political Science Review 7 (1913): 176.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Paul Light, “Vice-Presidential Influence under Rockefeller and Mondale,” Political Science Quarterly 98 (1983–1984): 618.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Page Smith, “Election of 1796,” History of American Presidential Elections: 1789–1968, ed. Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr (New York: McGraw Hill, 1971), 1: 70.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Ralph Adams Brown, The Presidency of John Adams (Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1975), 14.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    John T. Morse, John Adams (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1896), 259.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    John Ferling, John Adams: A Life (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1992), 331.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Michael Harwood, In the Shadow of the Presidency (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1966), 22.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Michael Nelson, “History of the Vice Presidency,” in Congressional Quarterly’s Guide to the Presidency, ed. Michael Nelson (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1996), 1: 165.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Donald Young, American Roulette: The History and Dilemma of the Vice-Presidency (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965), 10.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Richard D. Friedman, “Some Modest Proposals on the Vice-Presidency,” Michigan Law Review 86 (1988): 1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 17.
    Jody Baumgartner, The American Vice Presidency Reconsidered (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2006), 21.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    George C. Edwards and Lawrence R. Jacobs, “The New Vice Presidency: Institutions and Politics,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (2008): 371.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    Paul T. David, “The Vice Presidency: Its Institutional Evolution and Contemporary Status,” The Journal of Politics 29 (1967): 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 22.
    Irving G. Williams, The Rise of the Vice Presidency (Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press, 1956), 84.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    George Sirgiovanni, “The ‘Van Buren Jinx’: Vice Presidents Need Not Beware,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 18 (1988): 61–76.Google Scholar
  18. 26.
    Charles O. Paullin, “The Vice-President and the Cabinet,” The American Historical Review 29 (1924): 499–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 29.
    Jack Lechelt, The Vice Presidency in Foreign Policy: From Mondale to Cheney (El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly, 2009), 16.Google Scholar
  20. 30.
    James N. Giglio, “The Eagleton Affair: Thomas Eagleton, George McGovern, and the 1972 Vice Presidential Nomination,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 (2009): 647–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 31.
    Richard Moe, “The Making of the Modern Vice Presidency: A Personal Reflection,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (2008): 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 33.
    Michael Nelson, “Choosing the Vice President,” PS: Political Science and Politics 21 (1988): 862.Google Scholar
  23. 34.
    Gerald Pomper, “The Nomination of Hubert Humphrey for Vice-President,” The Journal of Politics 28 (1966): 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 36.
    Norma Lois Peterson, The Presidencies of William Henry Harrison and John Tyler (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1989), 21–24.Google Scholar
  25. 37.
    Dorothy Burne Goebel, William Henry Harrison: A Political Biography (Indianapolis, IN: Historical Bureau of the Indiana Library and Historical Department, 1926), 324.Google Scholar
  26. 38.
    Robert Gray Gunderson, The Log-Cabin Campaign (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1957), 41–60.Google Scholar
  27. 41.
    Richard C. Bain, Convention Decisions and Voting Records (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, 1960), 28.Google Scholar
  28. 42.
    Peter R. Levin, Seven by Chance: The Accidental Presidents (New York: Farrar, Straus, 1948), 9.Google Scholar
  29. 47.
    Doris Kearns Goodwin, The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2013), 68–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Theresa Marchant-Shapiro 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theresa Marchant-Shapiro

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations