Abstract
Knowles highlights two crucial points with regards to spoken language here: first, our common expectations, driven by years of schooling, to expect language to be the written word; and second, that spoken language appears to follow a pattern quite different to what we have in written text, giving rise to the impression that the spoken is “disjointed and inarticulate”.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
If you have occasion to write a conversation down, you are very likely to find it disjointed, stumbling and inarticulate. If you do react like this, that is because what you expect to find in speech follows your expectation of written language, particularly prose. It is difficult not to regard speech as an imperfect version of the written language.
(Knowles, 1987: 5)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Michael Pace-Sigge
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pace-Sigge, M. (2015). OF and TO Usage in Spoken Texts. In: The Function and Use of TO and OF in Multi-Word Units. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137470317_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137470317_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57551-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47031-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)