Advertisement

Mourning in a ‘Sociotechnically’ Acceptable Manner: A Facebook Case Study

  • David Myles
  • Florence Millerand
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies book series (PMMS)

Abstract

This chapter investigates how mourning practices are transposed on and performed through social network sites (SNS). We define mourning practices as the ways in which bereavement status is performed and grief is expressed in socially acceptable manners. This interest in the social dimension of mourning was already present in Durkheim’s work (1912/2008, p. 567) in which he argues that ‘grief is not the spontaneous expression of individual emotions’.1 Mourning practices are framed through a series of conventions, customs and rules (Baudry, 2003) that authorize certain rights and privileges, but also stress certain restrictions and obligations to specific individuals (de Vries, 2001; Sklar, 1991). Mourning ‘causes mass or individual behaviours (attitudes, conducts, rituals) that are more or less strictly codified depending on cases, places and times’ (Thomas, 1988, p. 44).

Keywords

Prospective Memory Social Network Site Online Social Network Memorial Page Acceptable Manner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur, P., 2009. Trauma online: Public exposure of personal grief and suffering, Traumatology, 15(4), pp. 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrau, A., 1992. Quelle mort pour demain?: essai d’anthropologie prospective. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  3. Baudry, P., 2001. La mémoire des morts, Tumultes, 16, pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baudry, P., 2003. Travail du deuil, travail de deuil, Etudes, 399(11), pp. 475–82.Google Scholar
  5. boyd, D. and Ellison, N. B., 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), pp. 210–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brubaker, J. R. and Hayes, G. R., 2011. ‘We will never forget you [online]’: An empirical investigation of post-mortem MySpace comments, Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Hangzhou, China), pp. 123–32.Google Scholar
  7. Brubaker, J. R., Hayes, G. R. and Dourish, P., 2013. Beyond the grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning, The Information Society, 29(3), pp. 152–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, B. and Landry, K., 2010. Logging on and letting out: Using online social networks to grieve and to mourn, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), pp. 341–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Church, S. H., 2013. Digital gravescapes: Digital memorializing on Facebook, The Information Society, 29(3), pp. 184–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A., 1994. Grounded theory methodology. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., eds, Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 273–85.Google Scholar
  11. Courbet, D. and Fourquet-Courbet, M. P., 2014. When a celebrity dies …Social identity, uses of social media, and the mourning process among fans: The case of Michael Jackson, Celebrity Studies, 5(3), pp. 275–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeGroot, J. M., 2009. Reconnecting with the Dead via Facebook: Examining Transcorporeal Communication as a Way to Maintain Relationships. Ohio University.Google Scholar
  13. Denzin, N. K., 1997. Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deseilligny, O., 2008. Du journal intime au blogue: quelles métamorphoses du texte?, Communication & langage, 155, pp. 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Vries, B., 2001. Grief: Intimacy’s reflection, Generations, 25(2), pp. 75–80.Google Scholar
  16. Duchastel, J., 2012. Overview of discourse analysis, its history and its links to computer assisted text analysis, Summer School, Chaire du Canada en mondialisation, citoyenneté et démocratie. Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
  17. Durkheim, É., 2008. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: Le système totémique en Australie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  18. Foot, K. A., Warnick, B. and Schneider, S. M., 2005. Web-based memorializing after September 11: Toward a conceptual framework, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), pp. 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forman, A. E., Kern, R. and Gil-Egui, G., 2012. Death and mourning as sources of community participation in online social networks: RIP pages in Facebook, First Monday, 17(9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Georges, F., 2009. Représentation de soi & identité numérique, Réseaux, 154(2), pp. 165–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Getty, E., Cobb, J., Gabeler, M., Nelson, C., Weng, E. and Hancock, J. T., 2011. I said your name in an empty room: Grieving and continuing bonds on Facebook. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Session: Death and Bereavement, Vancouver, Canada, 7–12 May.Google Scholar
  22. Goffman, E., 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Goodrum, S., 2008. When the management of grief becomes everyday life: The aftermath of murder, Symbolic Interaction, 31(4), pp. 422–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hine, C., 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Janssen, J., Prins, M. H., Van der Lans, J. M. and Baerveldt, C., 2000. The structure and variety of prayer — An empirical study of Dutch youth, Journal of Empirical Theology, 13(2), pp. 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jauréguiberry, F. and Proulx, S., 2011. Usages & enjeux des technologies de communication. Neuchâtel: Érès editions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jouët, J., 2000. Retour critique sur la sociologie des usages, Réseaux, 18(100), pp. 487–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhn, A., 2007. Photography and cultural memory: A methodological exploration, Visual Studies, 22(3), pp. 283–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langford, M., 2001. Suspended Conversations: The Afterlife of Memory in Photographic Albums. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lippy, C. H., 1983. Sympathy cards and the grief process, The Journal of Popular Culture, 17(3), pp. 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McEwen, R. and Scheaffer, K., 2013. Virtual mourning and memory construction on Facebook: Here are the terms of use, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mallein, P. and Toussaint, Y., 1994. L’intégration sociale des technologies d’information & de communication. Une sociologie des usages, Technologies de l’information & société, 4, pp. 315–35.Google Scholar
  33. Marwick, A. and Ellison, N. B., 2012. There isn’t wifi in heaven! Negotiating visibility on Facebook memorial pages, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56(3), pp. 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Millerand, F., 1998. Usages des NTIC: les approches de la diffusion, de l’innovation & de l’appropriation (1ère partie), COMMposite, 2(1), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  35. Papacharissi, Z., 2009. The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld, New Media & Society, 11(1–2), pp. 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillips, W., 2011. LOLing at tragedy: Facebook trolls, memorial pages and resistance to grief online, First Monday, 16(12).Google Scholar
  37. Riechers, A., 2013. The persistence of memory online: Digital memorials, fantasy, and grief as entertainment. In Maciel, C. and Pereira, V., eds, Digital Legacy and Interaction. New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roberts, P., 2012. 2 people like this: Mourning according to format, Bereavement Care, 31(2), pp. 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanders, T., 2005. Researching the online sex work community. In Hine, C. ed, Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Bergs Publisher, pp. 67–79.Google Scholar
  40. Sanderson, J. and Cheong, P. H., 2010. Tweeting prayers and communicating grief over Michael Jackson online, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), pp. 328–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sherlock, A., 2013. Larger than life: Digital resurrection and the re-enchantment of society, The Information Society, 29(3), pp. 164–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Silverstone, R. and Hirsch, E., 1992. Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sklar, F., 1991. Grief as a family affair: Property rights, grief rights, and the exclusion of close friends as survivor, Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 24(2), pp. 109–21.Google Scholar
  44. Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., 2013. Bridging collective memories and public agendas: Toward a theory of mediated prospective memory, Communication Theory, 23(2), pp. 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas, L. -V., 1988. Anthropologie de la mort. Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar
  46. Vicary, A. M. and Fraley, R. C., 2010. Student reactions to the shootings at Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois University: Does sharing grief and support over the internet affect recovery?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), pp. 1555–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© David Myles and Florence Millerand 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Myles
  • Florence Millerand

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations