Skip to main content

Interrogating Contemporary Research in Educational Innovation

  • Chapter
  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

Contemporary educational issues are abundant and diverse. These issues include claims and counter-claims, debates and questions about matters ranging from national curricula (Oates, 2011; Tani, 2011) and standardised assessment of students’ learning (Au, 2009; Richards, Vining, & Weimer, 2010) to parental involvement in school governance (Addi-Raccah & Ronit, 2009; Blackmore & Hutchison, 2010) and government funding of public education (Tandberg, 2010; White & Friendly, 2012) to the empowerment of so-called marginalised communities (Chilisa & Ntseane, 2010; Morton & Montgomery, 2012) and the ethics and politics of education research (Sikes & Piper, 2010; Basit, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Addi-Raccah, A., & Ronit, A. (2009). School governance and teachers’ attitudes to parents’ involvement in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 805–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, W. (2009). Social studies, social justice: W(h)ither the social studies in high-stakes testing? Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(1), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, J. (2005). Promoting innovation in developing countries: a conceptual framework (World Bank policy research working paper 3554). Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8965/wps3554.txt?sequence=2/bitstream/handle/10986/8965/wps3554.txt?sequence=2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010, December). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basit, T. N. (2013, September). Ethics, reflexivity and access in educational research: issues in intergenerational investigation. Research Papers in Education, 28(4), 506–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J., & Hutchison, K. (2010). Ambivalent relations: the ‘tricky footwork’ of parental involvement in school communities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(5), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blouin, R. A., Riffee, W. H., Robinson, E. T., Beck, D. E., Green, C, Joyner, P. U., Persky A. M., & Pollack, G. M. (2009). AACP curricular change summit supplement: roles of innovation in education delivery. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(9), article 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilisa, B., & Ntseane, G. (2010). Resisting dominant discourses: implications of indigenous, African feminist theory and methods for gender and education research. Gender and Education, 22(6), 617–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2013). Childhood, possibility thinking and wise, humanising educational futures. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning, P. (2004). Building a culture of innovation. Ubiquity, 5(8), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A. (2007). Creativity and innovation in education: moving beyond best practice. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Council for Educational Leaders, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Retrieved from www.acel.org.au/conf07/papers/Creativity%20and%20Innovation.ppt/conf07/papers/Creativity%20and%20Innovation.ppt

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, C, & Hargreaves, A. (2006, February). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2004). Learning for life: the foundations for lifelong learning. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, B., Yun, W., Sankar. H. S., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2012). A proposed framework for educational innovation dissemination. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(3), 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppell, S. (2010, January 31). Exhibition, performance, delight: the future of learning [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://workshop.heppell.mobi/2010/01/exhibition-performance-delight-future.html#links/2010/01/exhibition-performance-delight-future.html#links

  • Jacobsen, M., Lock, J., & Friesen, S. (2013). Strategies for engagement: knowledge building and intellectual engagement in participatory learning environments. Education Canada, 53(1), 14–18. Retrieved from: http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/strategies-engagement/education-canada/article/strategies-engagement

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N. (2003). Stimulating innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 388–400). London, UK: Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, M. S. (1973). The impact (or lack of it) of educational research on changes in educational practice. In L. Mann & D. Sabatino (Eds.), The first review of special education (vol. 2, pp. 203–227). Philadelphia, PA: JSE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. P., & Davidson, W. S. (2000). Dissemination of innovation as social change. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 421–438). doi: 10.1007/978-l-4615–4193–6_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. (1964). Innovation in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minocha, S., Schroeder, A., & Schneider, C. (2011). Role of the educator in social software initiatives in further and higher education: a conceptualisation and research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 889–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, M. H., & Montgomery, P. (2012, February). Empowerment-based non-formal education for Arab youth: a pilot randomized trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(2), 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009, September). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, T. (2011). Could do better: using international comparisons to refine the National Curriculum in England. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2004). B enchmarking innovation policy and innovation framework conditions. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33705586.pdf/site/worldforum/33705586.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2008a). 21st century learning: research, innovation and policy. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40554299.pdf/site/educeri21st/40554299.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2008b). Innovation strategy for education and training. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/40815797.pdf/edu/ceri/40815797.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009). Measuring innovation in education and training. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/43787562.pdf/edu/ceri/43787562.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. G, Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2010, February). Aboriginal performance on standardized tests: evidence and analysis from provincial schools in British Columbia. Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikes, P., & Piper, H. (2010). Ethical research, academic freedom and the role of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(3), 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, E., Reynolds, R., & Howley, P. (2013). Professional experience as a wicked problem in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandberg, D. A. (2010). Politics, interest groups and state funding of public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 51(5), 416–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tani, S. (2011). Is there a place for young people in the geography curriculum? Analysis of the aims and contents of the Finnish comprehensive school curricula. Nordidactica — Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 1, 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2012). Wicked issues in situating theory in close-up research. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009). Research and innovation framework. Melbourne, Vic, Australia: Author. Retrieved from https://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/publ/research/publ/Research_and_Innovation_framework.pdf/edulibrary/public/publ/research/publ/Research_and_Innovation_framework.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., Blackman, M., Dunville, R., & Saul, J. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–184. doi: 10.1007/sl0464–008–9174-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washor, E. (2009). Thoughts on innovation. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elliot-washor/thoughts-on-innovation_ b_329811.html/elliot-washor/thoughts-on-innovation_ b_329811.html

  • Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A., & Friendly, M. (2012). Public funding, private delivery: states, markets, and early childhood education and care in liberal welfare states — a comparison of Australia, the UK, Quebec, and New Zealand. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 14(4), 292–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Petrea Redmond, Jennifer Lock and Patrick Alan Danaher

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Redmond, P., Lock, J., Danaher, P.A. (2015). Interrogating Contemporary Research in Educational Innovation. In: Redmond, P., Lock, J., Danaher, P.A. (eds) Educational Innovations and Contemporary Technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468611_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics