Skip to main content
  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter first investigates the relationship between Turkish national law and international law and scrutinises the influence of international treaties on domestic law. Second, the study examines how the right to conscientious objection is dealt with in Turkish law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Malanczuk, P. (1997), Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, 7th edn, Routledge: London;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Starke, J. G. (1936), Monism and Dualism in the Theory of International Law, Oxford University Press: London, pp. 66–81;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Çınar, Ö. H. (2005), Avrupa İnsan Haklarι Mahkemesi Kararlarιnιn Türk Hukukuna Etkisi, İnsan Hakları Derneği İstanbul Yayınları: İstanbul, pp. 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pazarcı, H. (1995), Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, 5th edn, vol. I., Turhan Kitabevi: Ankara, pp. 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pazarcı (1995); Toluner, S. (1973), Milletlerarasi Hukuk İle İç Hukuk Arasmdaki İlişkiler, Sulhi Garan Matbaası: İstanbul; Akıllıoğlu, T., ‘Uluslararası İnsan Hakları Kurallarının İç Hukuktaki Yeri ve Değeri’, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi İnsan Haklarι Merkezi Dergisi, 1 (1991);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gündüz, A. (2000), Milletlerarasι Hukuk Temel Belgeler—Örnek Kararlar, 4th edn, Beta Basım: İstanbul;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Memiş, E., ‘İnsan Hakları Avrupa Standardı ve İç Hukuk Etkileşimi Analizleri’, Anayasa Yargιsι, 17 (2000), pp. 130–173.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Özbudun, E. (1995), Türk Anayasa Hukuku, 4th edn, Yetkin Yayınları: Ankara, p. 355; Pazarcı, pp. 33–34; Balta, B. T., ‘Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Türkiye’, Türkiye’de İnsan Hakları Semineri, 9–11 December 1968, Ankara, p. 278; Gündüz (2000), p. 152;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sağlam, F., ‘Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nin Türkiye’de Kapatılan Partilere İlişkin Kararların Partiler Hukukuna Etkisi’, Anayasa Yargısı, 16 (1999), p. 192; Toluner, p. 595;

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gölcüklü F. and Gözübüyük, Ş. (1994), Avrupa İnsan Haklarι Sözleşmesi ve Uygulamasι, Turhan Kitabevi: Ankara, pp. 21–22;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Çelik, E. F., ‘Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinin Türk Hukukundaki Yeri ve Uygulaması’, İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi (Lütfi Duran’a Armağan Özel Sayιsι), 1–3 (1988), p. 54; Akıllıoğlu, pp. 39 and 41; Fendoğlu, H. T., ‘Uluslararası İnsan Hakları Belgelerinin Uygulanmasında Bağımsız Ölçü Norm veya Destek Ölçü Norm Sorunu’, Anayasa Yargιsι, 17 (2000); Çınar (2005), pp. 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yılmaz, D., ‘Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Tarafından Bir Kanunun Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesine Aykırı Bulunması Halinde Uygulanacak Normun Tespiti, Türk Medeni Kanununun 187’nci ve Harçlar Kanununun 28/1-A Maddesi Örneği’, Adalet Dergisi, 37 (2010), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Articles 15(1), 16 of the 1982 Constitution. For further information on positive obligations see also Akandji-Kombe, J-F. (2007), Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights: A guide to the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe: Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Can, O., ‘Conscientious Objection and the Turkish Constitution’ in Çınar and Üsterci (2009), p. 238; Ömer Faruk Eminağaoğlu, ‘Özgürlük ve Vatan Hizmeti’, Radikal Gazetesi, 22 August 2005, available at http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=162046 (accessed 20 January 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Üçpınar, H., ‘The Criminality of Conscientious Objection in Turkey and Its Consequences’ in Çınar and Üsterci (2009), p. 243.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boyle, K., ‘Conscientious Objection in International Law and the Osman Murat Ülke Case’ in Çınar and Üsterci (2009), p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Despite the freedom of thought, conscience and religion not being explicitly recognised as a non-derogable right in Article 15 of the ECHR, most scholars argue this freedom is a non-derogable right. (Evans, C. (2003), Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press: Oxford, p. 165;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evans, M. D. (1997), Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, p. 317;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobs, F. G. and White, R. C. A. (1996), The European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd edn, Clarendon Press: Oxford, p. 211;

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Dijk, P. and Van Hoof, G. J. H. (1998), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd edn, Kluwer Law and Taxation: Deventer, p. 557).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See the commentary of 1982 Turkish Constitution, no. 2709, cited in TBMM (2011), Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasι—Madde Gerekçeli, TBMM: Ankara, p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eren, A., ‘Türk Hukukunda Vicdani Red’, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61 (2006), p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pflüger, T. (2008), ‘Professional Soldiers and the Right to Conscientious Objection in the European Union’, GUE/NGL and WRI: Brussels and London, p. 52;

    Google Scholar 

  24. Üçpınar, H., ‘Türkiye’de Vicdani Reddin Suç ve Ceza Konusu Olması ve Sonuçları’ in Çınar, Ö. H. and Üsterci, C. (eds) (2008), Çarklardaki Kum: Vicdani Red—Düşünsel Kaynaklar ve Deneyimler, İletişim Yayınları: İstanbul, p. 315.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jowitt, E. and Walsh, C. (1977), Jowitt’s Dictionary of English Law, 2nd edn (by John Burke), Sweet & Maxwell Limited: London, p. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  26. An interview with Uğur Yorulmaz, cited in Altınay (2004), The Myth of the Military-Nation, p. 110.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. See an interview with Muhammed Serdar Delice, ‘Peygamber ocağı’nda içeriden bir gedik’, conducted by the Etkin Haber Ajansı, 4 March 2010, available at http://www.etha.com.tr/~cbaskent/pol/pol/26.html (accessed 5 July 2013); see also Başkent, C., ‘Sivil Ölüm ve Toplumsal Empati’, available at http://web.cs.gc.cuny.edu/~cbaskent/pol/pol/26.html (accessed 8 July 2013) and Üçpınar (2009), p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaos GL, ‘GATA’dan Eşcinsellere Yeni Psikolojik İşkence: Aile Görüşmesi’, 3 March 2012, available at http://www.kaosgl.com/sayfa.php?id=10733 (accessed 27 January 2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Özgür Heval Çinar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Çinar, Ö.H. (2014). Intricacies of the Turkish Legal System. In: The Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Turkey’s Obligations under International Human Rights Law. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468116_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics