Skip to main content

International Criminal Law Applicable to ICA Weapons and Riot Control Agents

  • Chapter
Chemical Control

Part of the book series: Global Issues Series ((GLOISS))

  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

The preceding analysis of potential mechanisms to regulate ICA weapons, RCAs and related means of delivery has concentrated upon agreements, treaties and international law intended to constrain and influence the activities of States. Another important alternative approach is to address individual responsibility and culpability through the employment of international criminal law. According to Cassese: “International crimes are breaches of international rules entailing the personal criminal liability of the individuals concerned.”1 Some of the crimes under international law have been considered to be violations of jus cogens, peremptory norms that “have a rank and status superior to those of all the other rules of the international community” and which cannot be set aside by States, through for example a treaty.2 According to Oñate, Exterkate, Tabassi and van der Borght, although there was not necessarily a consensus on a definite list of such crimes under international law it has been widely accepted that war crimes and genocide would certainly be included.3 In addition, Hampson has added both aggression and crimes against humanity to this list.4 In certain situations, international criminal law could be applied by national courts or international courts to the use of, and possibly the transfer of, chemical weapons. As part of the HAC stage-two analysis, this chapter explores the potential applicability of international criminal law and judicial mechanisms to cases involving the serious misuse of ICA weapons and RCAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cassese, A. International Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 23, as cited by Oñate, S., Exterkate, B., Tabassi, L. and van der Borght, E. Lessons Learned: Chemicals Trader Convicted of War Crimes, Hague Justice Journal, volume 2, number 1, 2007, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cassese, A. International Criminal Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 199. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 23rd May 1969, entered into force 27th January 1980) 1155 UNTS 331 Article 53, as cited by Oñate, S., Exterkate, B., Tabassi, L. and van der Borght, E. (2007) op.cit., p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hampson, F. International Law and the Regulation of Weapons, in Pearson, A., Chevrier, M. and Wheelis, M. (eds), Incapacitating Biochemical Weapons. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007, pp. 231–260.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, K. with Spence, S. and Leal, R. Chemical and Biological Weapons Use in the Rome Statute: A Case for Change, VERTIC brief 14, February 2011, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tabassi, L. (2004) op.cit., p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tabassi, L. (2004) op.cit., p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tabassi, L. and van der Borght, E. Chemical Warfare as Genocide and Crimes against Humanity, Hague Justice Journal, volume 2, number 1, 2007, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tabassi, L. (2004) op.cit., p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tabassi, L. and van der Borght, E. (2007) op.cit., p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hampson, F. (2007) op.cit., p. 232. For further information on these bodies, see Rikhof, J. Fewer Places to Hide? The Impact of Domestic War Crimes Prosecutions on International Impunity, Criminal Law Forum, volume 20, number 1, 2009, pp. 4–8; Zgonec-Rožej, M. (May 2010) op.cit., pp. 55–61 and 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For information and analysis of the Anfal trial, see International Centre for Transitional Justice, the Anfal trial and the Iraqi High Tribunal updates 1–3, 2006, available at http://ictj.org/publications (accessed 2nd April 2015); Trahan, J. A Critical Guide to the Iraqi High Tribunal’s Anfal Judgement: Genocide Against the Kurds, Michigan Journal of International Law, volume 30, 13th March 2009, pp. 305–407; Tabassi, L. and van der Borght, E. Chemical Warfare as Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, Hague Justice Journal, volume 2, number 1, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For a detailed analysis, see Trahan, J. (2009) op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hampson, F. (2007) op.cit., p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oñate, S., Exterkate, B., Tabassi, L. and van der Borght, E. (2007) op.cit., p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rikhof, J. (2009) op.cit., p. 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hankin, S. Overview of Ways to Import Core International Crimes into National Criminal Law, in Bergsmo, M., Hayashi, M. and Harlem, N. (eds), Importing Core International Crimes into National Criminal Law, 2nd edn, Oslo: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010, pp. 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rikhof, J. (2009) op.cit., pp. 9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. For example, Australia, Jordan, Malta and the UK. See Rikhof, J. (2009) op.cit., p. 9. See also Coalition for the International Criminal Court, Ratification and Implementation, available at http://www.coalitionfortheicc.org/?mod=ratimp (accessed 10th July 2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. For example, Kenya, New Zealand, South Africa and Uganda. See Rikhof, J. (2009) op.cit., p. 9; CICC website.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oñate, S., Exterkate, B., Tabassi, L. and van der Borght, E. (2007) op.cit., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oñate, S., Exterkate, B., Tabassi, L. and van der Borght, E. (2007) op.cit., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meselson, M. and Perry Robinson, J. A Draft Convention to Prohibit Biological and Chemical Weapons Under International Criminal Law, Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, volume 28, edition 1, Winter 2004, pp. 57–70, at p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meselson, M. and Robinson, J. P. (2004) op.cit., p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Perry Robinson, J. Criminalization of Biological and Chemical Armament, CBW Conventions Bulletin, Special Issue, February 2011, Harvard Sussex Program, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meselson, M. and Robinson, J. P. (2004) op.cit., p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Perry Robinson, J. (2011) op.cit., p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Michael Crowley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crowley, M. (2016). International Criminal Law Applicable to ICA Weapons and Riot Control Agents. In: Chemical Control. Global Issues Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467140_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics