Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Turkish Foreign Policy in a Transatlantic Context: A Case for Soft Power and Public Diplomacy

  • Chapter
Turkey’s Public Diplomacy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy ((GPD))

Abstract

The end of the Cold War did not bring about an immediate, major change in Turkey’s foreign policy. Despite the surprising collapse of the bipolar international structure and the following outbreak of ethnic and religious wars in the surrounding regions from the Balkans to the Caucasus, the transformation of Turkey’s foreign policy has been gradual for two principal reasons. First of all, Turkey, situated at the intersection of highly unstable geopolitical areas, continued to follow the traditional Kemalist dictum of foreign policy, “peace at home, peace in the world.” The underlying logic of this policy denotes multilateralism in diplomacy with active participation in international institutions, observance of international law, and more importantly a noninvolvement strategy with the internal affairs of the neighboring countries. These core principles provided the Turkish policy makers a basis for a coolheaded approach toward the radical changes in the aftermath of the Cold War. The second reason that made Turkey adopt a gradual strategy of change in foreign policy relates to its capacity and its capabilities, particularly in terms of influencing political shifts among neighboring countries. Turkey was, neither militarily nor economically, strong enough to benefit extensively from the emerging opportunities by the end of the Cold War. Its recently liberalized economy was still vulnerable to outside shocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among the Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948), pp. 80–107.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herbert Butterfield, “The New Diplomacy and Historical Diplomacy,” in Martin Wight et.al., Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1966), pp. 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939 (New York: Perennial, 2001), p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholas Cull, “How We Got Here” in Philip Seib (ed.) Toward a New Public Diplomacy: Redirecting US Foreign Policy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 23–48

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jian Wang, “Introduction: China’s Search for Soft Power,” in Jian Wang (ed.) Soft Power in China: Public Diplomacy Through Communication (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), pp. 1–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. R. S. Zaharna, Battles to Bridges: US Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy After 9/11 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Philip Seib, Toward a New Public Diplomacy: Redirecting US Foreign Policy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Joseph Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joseph Nye, “Soft Power and American Foreign Policy,” Political Science Quarterly 119, no. 2, (2004): 255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph Nye, “Decline of America’s Soft Power: Why Washington Should Worry,” Foreign Affairs (May/June 2004): 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joseph Nye, The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alfred Grosser, The Western Alliance: The European-American Relations since 1945 (New York: Vintage Books, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph Satterthwaite, “The Truman Doctrine: Turkey,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 401 (1972): 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruce Kuniholm, “Turkey and the West since World War II,” in Vojtech Mastny and Craig Nation (eds) Turkey between East and West: New Challenges for a Rising Regional Power (New York: Westview Press, 1996), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suat Bilge, Güç Komşuluk: Türkiye-Sovyetler Birliği İlişkileri, 1920–1964 (Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erik Jan Zürcher, Turkey: A Modern History (London: I.B. Tauris, 1995), p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Atila Eralp, “Turkey and the European Community in the Changing Post-War International System,” in Canan Balkir and Alan Williams (eds) Turkey and Europe (London: Pinter Publishers, 1993), pp. 24–45.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andrew Mango, “Reflections on the Atatürkist Origins of Turkish Foreign Policy and Domestic Linkages,” in Makovsky and Sayari (eds), Turkey’s New World: Changing Dynamics of Turkish Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: The Washington Institute of Near Eastern Policy, 2000), pp. 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Donald Everett Webster, The Turkey of Ataturk: Social Process in the Turkish Reformation (Philedelphia, PA: American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1939) pp.112–126.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oral Sander, “Turkish Foreign Policy: Forces of Continuity and of Change,” Turkish Review 7, no. 34 (1993): 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrew Mango, Turkey: The Challenge of a New Role (New York: Praeger, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alexei Arbatov, “Russia’s Foreign Policy Alternatives,” International Security 18, no. 2 (1993): 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malik Mufti, “Daring and Caution in Turkish Foreign Policy,” Middle East Journal52, no. 1 (1998): 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Graham Avery and Fraser Cameron, The Enlargement of the European Union (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Christopher Hill, “The Geopolitical Implications of Enlargement,” in Jan Zielonka (ed.) Europe Unbound: Enlarging and Reshaping the Boundaries of the European Union (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 94–115.

    Google Scholar 

  26. John Lewis Gaddis, “The Cold War, the Long Peace, and the Future,” in Michael Hogan (ed.) The End of the Cold War: Its Meaning and Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 21–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Miles Kahler and Werner Link, Europe and America: A Return to History (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1996), pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robert Jervis, “Unipolarity: A Structural Perspective,” World Politics 61, no. 1 (2009): 188–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raffaella del Sarto and Tobias Schumacher, “From EMP to ENP: What Is at Stake with the European Neighborhood Policy toward the Southern Mediterranean?” European Foreign Affairs Review 10 (2005): 17–38

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roberto Aliboni, “The Geopolitical Implications of the European Neighborhood Policy,” European Foreign Affairs Review 10 (2005): 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ketie Peters, Jan Rood, and Christof van Agt, “The Eastern Partnership: Towards a New Era of Cooperation between the EU and Its Eastern Neighbours?” Clingendael European Studies Program, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ali Karaosmanoglu, “The Evolution of the National Security Culture and the Military in Turkey,” Journal of International Affairs 54, no. 1 (2000): 200–216.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andrew Mango, “The Turkish Model,” Middle Eastern Studies 29, no. 4, (1993): 726–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eric Rouleau, “The Challenges to Turkey,” Foreign Affairs (November-December 1993), pp. 110–126.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ihsan Dagi, “Human Rights and Democratization: Turkish Politics in the European Context,” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 1, no. 3 (2001): 51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Necati Polat, “Identity Politics and the Domestic Context of Turkey’s European Union Accession,” Government and Opposition 41, no. 4 (2006): 512–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Malcolm Cooper, “The Legacy of Ataturk: Turkish Political Structures and Policy Making,” International Affairs 78, no. 1 (2002): 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hasan Kosebalaban, “Turkey’s EU Membership: A Clash of Security Cultures,” Middle East Policy 9, no. 2 (2002): 130–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thomas Diez, “Turkey, the European Union and Security Complexes Revisited,” Mediterranean Politics 10, no. 2 (2005): 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. David Kushner, “Self-perception and Identity in Contemporary Turkey,” Journal of Contemporary History 32, no. 2 (1997): 219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Atila Eralp, “Turkey and the European Community: Forging New Identities Along Old Lines,” New Perspectives on Turkey, (Fall 1992): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Caglar Keyder, “Moving in from the Margins? Turkey in Europe,” Diogenes, 53, no. 2 (2006): 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Saban Taniyici, “Transformation of Political Islam in Turkey: Islamist Welfare Party’s Pro-EU Turn,” Party Politics 9, no. 4 (2003): 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hakan Yavuz and Nihat Ali Ozcan, “The Kurdish Question and Turkey’s Justice and Development Party,” Middle East Journal 13, no. 1 (2006): 102–119.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kivanç Ulusoy, “Turkey and the EU: Democratization, Civil-Military Relations, and the Cyprus Issue,” Insight Turkey 10, no. 4 (2008): 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Andrea Gates, “Negotiating Turkey’s Accession: The Limitations of the Current EU Strategy,” European Foreign Affairs Review 10 (2005): 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fusun Turkmen, “Turkish-American Relations: A Challenging Transition,” Turkish Studies 10 no. 1 (2009): 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mohammed Ayoob, “From Regional System to Regional Society: Exploring Key Variables in the Construction of Regional Order,” Australian Journal of International Affairs 53, no. 3 (1999): 247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Andre Barrinha, “The Ambitious Insulator: Revisiting Turkey’s Position in Regional Security Complex Theory,” Mediterranean Politics (2013): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Emel Parlar Dal and Emre Ersen, “Reassessing the ‘Turkish Model’ in the Post-Cold War Era: A Role Theory Perspective,” Turkish Studies 15, no. 2 (2014): 258–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Asli Bali, “A Turkish Model for the Arab Spring,” Middle East Law and Governance V3 (2011): 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Omer Taşpınar, “The End of the Turkish Model,” Survival 56, no. 2 (2014): 49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Henri Barkey, “Turkish Democracy: Two Steps Forward, Two Steps Backward,” Harvard International Review (Spring 2014): 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  54. Amir Taheri, “The Turkish Roller Coaster,” American Foreign Policy Interests 36 (2014): 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Meliha Benli Altunisik, “The Possibilities and Limits of Turkey’s soft power in the Middle East,” Insight Turkey 10, no.2 (2008): 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Faruk Yalvac, “Strategic Depth or Hegemonic Depth? A Critical Realist Analysis of Turkey’s Position in the World System,” International Relations 26, no. 2 (2012): 165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Stephanos Constantinides, “Turkey: The Emergence of a New Foreign Policy; The Neo-Ottoman Imperial Model,” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 24, no. 2 (1996): 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Özlem Demirtas Bagdonas, “Reading Turkey’s Foreign Policy on Syria: The AKP’s Construction of a Great Power Identity and the Politics of Grandeur,” Turkish Studies (2014): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Meliha Altunisik and Esra Cuhadar, “Turkey’s Search for a Third Party Role in Arab-Israeli Conflicts: A Neutral Facilitator or a Principal Power Mediator?” Mediterranean Politics 15, no. 3 (2010): 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Andy Muller Maguhn et. al., “A Two-Faced Friendship: Turkey Is ‘Partner and Target’ for the NSA,” Spiegel Online International, 31 August 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ziya Öniş, “Turkey and the Arab Revolutions: Boundaries of Regional Power Influence in a Turbulent Middle East,” Mediterranean Politics 19, no. 2 (2014): 203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ziya Onis and Suhnaz Yilmaz, “Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey During the AKP Era,” Turkish Studies 10, no. 1 (2009): 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kivanç Ulusoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

B. Senem Çevik Philip Seib

Copyright information

© 2015 B. Senem Çevik and Philip Seib

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ulusoy, K. (2015). Turkish Foreign Policy in a Transatlantic Context: A Case for Soft Power and Public Diplomacy. In: Çevik, B.S., Seib, P. (eds) Turkey’s Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466983_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation