Expanding Perspective: Reaching Out to China and the East

Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy book series (GPD)


This article aims to shed light on the Turkish government’s public diplomacy vision and activities geared toward the Asia-Pacific region in the twenty-first century. The first decade of the century is associated with the rise of the conservative Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP, or JDP) in Turkish politics. Progovernment circles often highlight the economic growth and political stability associated with the JDP era, as opposed to the 1990s when Turkey was afflicted with financial crises and weak coalition governments. Main domestic transformations under the JDP rule (2002–2014) include the declining influence of military circles in decision making, and the prospect of a resolution for Turkey’s long standing Kurdish problem. In the foreign policy realm, JDP remains committed to its promise of granting Turkey its full EU membership, although it may be difficult to reconcile this ideal with the growing emphasis on Islamic solidarity and Ottoman nostalgia. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s governments criticized previous administrations for adopting a strict pro-Western orientation and turning their backs on Turkey’s Middle Eastern neighbors. Turkey’s “zero-problems with neighbors” policy succeeded in changing this image, at least until the complications brought about by the Arab Spring.


Foreign Policy Southeast Asian Country Soft Power Turkish Culture Public Diplomacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    Joseph Nye, “What China and Russia Don’t Get about Soft Power,” Foreign Policy (April 29, 2013). Scholar
  2. 4.
    Nancy Snow, “Rethinking Public Diplomacy” in Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (New York: Routledge, 2009), p. 4.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Gyorgy Szondi, “Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences,” in Virginia Duthoit and Ellen Huijigh (eds) Discussion Papers in Diplomacy (Netherlands Institute of International Relations, Clingendeal: The Hague, 2008). Scholar
  4. 6.
    See İbrahim Kalin, “Soft Power and Public Diplomacy in Turkey,” Perceptions 16, no. 3 (Autumn 2011): 10. Scholar
  5. 7.
    Metin Parlak, “Nation Branding in Turkey: A Rickety Bridge between East and West,” in “Chapter 4: Nation Branding: Country Specific Evaluation,” Cultural Diplomacy Outlook Report, (Institute of Cultural Diplomacy, 2011). Scholar
  6. 9.
    Ali Baici and Nebi Miş, “Turkey’s Role in the Alliance of Civilizations: A New Perspective in Turkish Foreign Policy?” Turkish Studies 9, no. 3 (2008): 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 10.
    İbrahim Kalın, “Soft Power and Public Diplomacy in Turkey,” Perceptions 16, no. 3 (Autumn 2011): 10. Scholar
  8. 12.
    Bayram Balcı, “Gülen Movement and Turkish Soft Power,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (February 4, 2014). Scholar
  9. 13.
    For the weaknesses of Islamic/neo-Ottoman discourse in sub-Saharan Africa, see Gokhan Bacik and Isa Afacan, “Turkey Discovers Sub-Saharan Africa: The Critical Role of Agents in the Construction of Turkish Foreign Policy Discourse,” Turkish Studies 14, no. 3(2013): 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 14.
    See Meliha Benli Altunışık, “Challenges to Turkey’s ‘Soft Power’ in the Middle East,” TESEV Foreign Policy Program (Istanbul: June 2011). Scholar
  11. 17.
    Kishore Mahbubani, “Seven Pillars of Singapore’s Soft Power,” The Huffington Post, November 15, 2013. Scholar
  12. 18.
    Reşat Bayer and Fuat Keyman, “Turkey: An Emerging Hub of Globalization and Internationalist Humanitarian Actor?” Globalizations 9, no. 1 (2012): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 21.
    See Senem Çevik, “The Rise of NGOs: Islamic Faith Diplomacy,” USC Center on Public Diplomacy May 27, 2014. Scholar
  14. 22.
    Pınar İpek, “Ideas and Change in Foreign Policy Instruments: Soft Power and the Case of the Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency,” Foreign Policy Analysis (2013): 1–21.Google Scholar
  15. 26.
    Sadi Kaymaz, “Türkiye’ye gelen turist sayisinda rekor,” Hürriyet, April 1, 2013. Scholar
  16. 28.
    Bruce Humes, “Translation Crunch: Turkey Revs Up for Role as Country of Honor at 2014 Beijing Book Fair,” Altaic Storytelling (blog), November 27, 2013. Scholar
  17. 42.
    Gözde Ergin and Fahri Türk, “Türkiye’de öğrenim gören Orta Asyalı öğrenciler,” Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler D ergisi, Cilt 2, Sayı 1, 2010. Scholar
  18. 47.
    For the link between nation branding and Arabic-language broadcasting, See Omar Al-Ghazzi and Marwan M. Kraidy, “Neo-Ottoman Cool 2: Turkish Nation Branding and Arabic-Language Transnational Broadcasting,” International Journal of Communication, 7 (2013): 2341–2360. Scholar
  19. 50.
    For the discrepancy between the number offollowers on the Office ofPublic Diplomacy’s Turkish and English accounts on Twitter, See Efe Sevin, “Bridge No More? Turkish Public Diplomacy and Branding under the AKP Government,” E-International Relations. October 5, 2012. Scholar

Copyright information

© B. Senem Çevik and Philip Seib 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations