Skip to main content

The 100 calories paradox

An insightful packaging innovation

  • Chapter
Why People (Don’t) BUY

Abstract

Keebler’s deluxe chocolate chip cookies are Jennifer’s favorite brand of cookies. They are neither too chewy nor too crumbly. And they have just the right amount of chocolate chips in them to make them irresistible. So on a Saturday evening in 2004, during a weekly visit to the grocery store when she found that Keebler’s deluxe chocolate chip cookies were on sale—two regular packs for $5—she was instinctively inclined to add two packs to her shopping cart.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Thompson, Stephanie (2006), Consumers Pay More for Less with 100 Calories Packs, Advertising Age, April 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Science in the Public Interest report on 100 calories prices, 7 July 2007, available at http://cspinet.org/new/200708141.html, date accessed 2 November 2014.

  • Peters, Jeremy (2007), In Small Packages, Fewer Calories and More Profit, New York Times, July 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Kurt (1943), Defining the Field at a Given Time, Psychological Review, 50, 292–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, Andrew (2008), The Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation, Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy (1823), Introduction to Principles and Morals of Legislation, Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1990), Brain Systems that Mediate both Emotion and Cognition, Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. and White, T. L. (1994), Behavioral Inhibition, Behavioral Activation, and Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2005), Value from Regulatory Fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2000), Making a good decision: Value from fit, American Psychologist, 55, 1217–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, D. M., Mathias, C. W., Marsh, D. M. and Jagar, A. A. (2005), Laboratory Measures of Impulsivity Behavior Research Methods, 37, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., Penfold, R. B., Hawkins, A., Maccombs, J., Wallace, B. and Reynolds, B. (2014), Dimensions of Impulsive Behavior and Treatment Outcomes for Adolescent Smokers, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel (2011), Thinking Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, Gerd and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang (2011), Heuristic Decision Making, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 62 (January), 451–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Maura L., Nowlis, Stephen M., Mandel, Naomi and Morales, Andrea C. (2008), Do 100-Calorie Packs Lead to Increased Consumption? The Effect of Reduced Food Sizes and Packages on the Consumption Behavior of Restrained Eaters and Unrestrained Eaters, Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (October), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandon, Pierre and Wansink, Brian (2012), Does Food Marketing Need to Make Us Fat? A Review and Solutions, Nutrition Reviews, 70:10, 571–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, Brian, Payne, Collin R. and Shimizu, Mitsuru (2011), The 100-Calorie Semi-Solution: Sub-Packaging Most Reduces Intake Among the Heaviest, Obesity, 19:5 (Spring), 1098–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, Brian and Chandon, Pierre (2006), Can “Low Fat” Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity?, Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (November), 605–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, Brian (2012), Package Size, Portion Size, Serving Size ... Market Size: The Unconventional Case for Half-Size Servings, Marketing Science, 31:1, 54–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Amitav Chakravarti and Manoj Thomas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chakravarti, A., Thomas, M. (2015). The 100 calories paradox. In: Why People (Don’t) BUY. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466693_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics