Abstract
States have many options to resolve bilateral conflicts. While international law compels them to use peaceful means, states are free to choose whatever approach they like. Of course, states can simply initiate direct negotiations with their opponents without involving any type of third party. Yet there are an ever-increasing number of informal and formal forums available for dispute settlement. The proliferation of international courts and quasi-judicial bodies as well as meaningful settlement attempts by international organizations has given rise to the opportunity of selecting between different venues. Nowadays states can choose among several courts and frameworks providing dispute settlement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Aletta Mondré
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mondré, A. (2015). Conclusion: The Choice of the Best Forum. In: Forum Shopping in International Disputes. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466655_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466655_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-46664-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46665-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)