Abstract
In 1990, as the controversy over The Satanic Verses rumbled on, Simon Lee published a brave little book called The Cost of Free Speech, which ran against the grain of a liberal consensus that saw no merit whatsoever in the Muslim protests against the novel. In the Preface, he wrote, ‘so many of those who purport to value free speech betray their ideals by failing to analyse exactly why freedom of expression is important, or from whom threats to free speech arise, or when it is wrong to exercise the right to free speech’. He went on to state his belief that ‘free speech is under threat mostly from ourselves and, in particular, from our refusal to face up to the weaknesses in our own reasoning and to changes in the world’.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Simon Lee, The Cost of Free Speech (London: Faber, 1990) p. ix.
An example is Peter Jones’s otherwise brilliant essay ‘Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie’, British Journal of Political Science, 20:4, 1990, pp. 415–37.
Andrew Gibson, Postmodernity, Ethics and the Novel: From Leavis to Levinas (London: Routledge, 1999).
Glen Newey, ‘Unlike a Scotch Egg’, London Review of Books, 35:23, 5 December 2013, p. 22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Anshuman A. Mondal
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mondal, A.A. (2014). Introduction. In: Islam and Controversy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466082_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466082_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47167-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46608-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)