Skip to main content
  • 280 Accesses

Abstract

This inquiry examines empathy as used in context even when the word “empathy” is not explicitly mentioned. The capacity for empathy, not the mere word, is engaged in diverse intellectual traditions. The difference between the mention of the word “empathy” and its use is indicated by enclosing the mention in quotation marks. A definition of empathy is proposed in which it is a unified multi-dimensional process that includes empathic receptivity, empathic understanding, empathic interpretation, and empathic responsiveness. These aspects of empathy form a unified whole and the application of this definition makes sense out of a diversity of apparently conflicting examples, applications, descriptions, and definitions of empathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Lou Agosta

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agosta, L. (2014). Introduction: Rewriting the Definition of Empathy. In: A Rumor of Empathy: Rewriting Empathy in the Context of Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137465344_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics