Skip to main content

Human Resource Management and Innovative Behaviour: Considering Interactive, Informal Learning Activities

  • Chapter
Human Resource Management, Innovation and Performance

Abstract

In a rapidly changing business environment, organisations need to be entrepreneurial and innovative in order to identify new opportunities for sustained superior performance (Hayton, 2005; Shipton, West, Parkes, Dawson & Patterson, 2006). Innovation can be understood as a strategic orientation involving the regeneration of product, processes, services and/or strategies. It rests upon an organisation’s ability to learn through both exploration of new knowledge and exploitation of existing knowledge. One of the most critical resources that organisations can draw upon in order to achieve innovation at the organisational level is their employees’ innovative (work) behaviour (Cohn, Katzenbach & Vlak, 2008; West & Farr, 1990), also known as entrepreneurial behaviour (de Jong, Parker, Wennekers, & Wu, 2013). Employees’ innovative behaviour refers to the process of initiation and the intentional introduction of bringing new problem-solving ideas into use, thereby enhancing a product, service or process. It encompasses both idea generation (creativity) and the application of the new ideas within a group or organisation (Amabile, 1988; Nonaka, 1991). Entrepreneurial behaviour can be defined as the extent to which employees proactively engage in the creation, introduction and application of opportunities at work, marked by taking business-related risks (De Jong, et al., 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amabile, T. (1988) A Model of Creativity and Innovations in Organizations. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, H.T.J. Sanders, K. Cogin, J.A. & Lin V.C.H. (2015) Multiple HR Practices and Performance: A Review of the Pervasiveness and Trajectory of Methodological Choices. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednall, T., Sanders, K. & Runhaar, P. (2014) Stimulating Informal Learning Activities through Perceptions of Performance Appraisal Quality and HRM System Strength: A Two-Wave Study. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13 (1): 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednall, T.C. & Sanders, K. (2014) Formal Training Stimulates Follow-Up Participation in Informal Learning: A Three Wave Study. Academy of Management, annual meeting. Philadelphia, US, August 1–5, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boselie, P., Dietz, G. & Boon, C. (2005) Commonalities and Contradictions in Research on Human Resource Management and Performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 15 (3): 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D.E. & Ostroff, C. (2004) Understanding HRM-Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of “Strength” of the HRM System. Academy of Management Review, 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M.S. & Stevens C.E. (2004) Managing Human Resources in Small Organizations: What Do We Know? Human Resource Management Review, 14: 295–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, J., Katzenbach, J. & Vlak, G. (2008) Finding and Grooming Breakthrough Innovators. Harvard Business Review, 86 (12): 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J.P.J., Parker, S.K., Wennekers, S. & Wu, C-H. (2013) Entrepreneurial Behaviour in organizations: Does Job Design Matter? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, DOI: 10.1111 / etap. 12084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999) Psychological Safety, Trust and Learning in Organizations: A Group Lens. In R.M. Kramer & K.S. Cook (Eds.) Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches. (pp. 239–272). New York, USA: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A.W. (1960) The Norm of Reciprocity. A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25: 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. (2005) Promoting Corporate Entrepreneurship through Human Resource Practices: A Review of Empirical Research. Human Resource Management Review, 15: 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harney, B., & Dundon T. (2006) Capturing Complexity: Developing an Integrated Approach to Analysing HRM in SMEs . Human Resource Management Journal, 16: 48–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichniowski, C., Kochan, T. A., Levine, D., Olson, C. & Strauss, G. (1996) What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment. Industrial Relations, 35: 299–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1988) When a Thousand Flowers Bloom. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Charlotte, and Eric Van Straten (1997) ‘Personeelsbeleid in Enkele MKB-bedrijven,’ [Human Resource Policy in some SME firms] EIM Strategic Study 9703, Zoetermeer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotey, B. & Slade, P. (2005) Formal Human Resource Management Practices in Growing Small Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 43: 16–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K. & Foss, N.J. (2003) New Human Resource Management Practices, Complementarities and the Impact on Innovation Performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27: 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K. & Foss, N.J. (2013) Human Resource Practices and Innovation. In M. Dodgson, D. Gann and N. Phillips. Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford (UK): University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, M.C. (2005) a Survey of Factors Influencing the Participation of Two Professional Groups in Informal Workplace Learning Activities. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16: 501–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991) The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, 69: 96–104.Nonaka (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W. & Weesie, J. (1990) Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: An Example of Network Effects. American Journal of Sociology, 96: 626–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W. & Weesie, J. (2000) The Management of Durable Relations. In J. Weesie, & W. Raub (Eds.), The Management of Durable Relations. Theoretical Models and Empirical Studies of Households and Organisations. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K. (2009) Cooperative Behaviors in Organizations. In R. Morrison & S. Wright. Friends and Enemies in Organizations: A Work Psychology Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K. & Shipton, H. (2012) The Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Behaviour in a Healthcare Context: A Team Learning versus a Cohesion Perspective. European Journal of International Management, 6 (1): 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K., Shipton, H.. & Gomes, J. (2014) Is HRM Process Important? Past, Current and Future Challenges. Human Resource Management, 53 (4): 489–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K., Moorkamp, M., Torka, N., Groeneveld, S. & Groeneveld, C. (2010) How to Support Innovative Behaviour? The Role of LMX and Satisfaction with HR Practices. Technology and Investment, 1: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K. & Yang, H. (in press) How to Make Sense of Human Resource Management; Employees’ Attribution to Explain the HRM — Performance Relationship. Human Resource Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipton, H., West, M. A., Dawson, J. Birdi, K. & Patterson, M. (2006) HRM as a Predictor of Innovation. Human Resource Management Journal, 16 (1): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, G.S. & Janssen, O. (2003) Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation. Journal of Management, 29: 729–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (1990) Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. (1985) From Control to Commitment in the Workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63: 76–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Karin Sanders and Cai-Hui (Veronica) Lin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanders, K., Lin, CH. (2016). Human Resource Management and Innovative Behaviour: Considering Interactive, Informal Learning Activities. In: Shipton, H., Budhwar, P., Sparrow, P., Brown, A. (eds) Human Resource Management, Innovation and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137465191_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics