Advertisement

Architectures of Obsolescence: Lessons for History

  • Daniel M. Abramson

Abstract

This chapter on obsolescence and architecture begins with an historian’s question about capitalism and modernity. The eminent scholar Eric Hobsbawm, in a 2010 interview, was asked, “to pick still unexplored topics … presenting major challenges for future historians.” Hobsbawm replied with a questi n of his own. “How is it, then, that humans and societies structured to resist dynamic development come to terms with a mode of production whose essence is endless and unpredictable dynamic development?”1 Hobsbawm directs us to one of capitalism’s contradictions, between the system’s necessity for change, on the one hand, and the human need for constancy, on the other. How are these reconciled? How does capitalism persist, in other words, in violation of basic human impulses?

Keywords

Real Estate American Public Health Association Urban Renewal Residential Satisfaction Building Owner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Reginald Pelham Bolton, Building forProfit: Principles Governing theEconomic Improvement ofReal Estate ( New York: De Vinne, 1911 ), 73.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    John Roberts, “Obsolescence in the Marshall Field Wholesale Building,” Bulleting of the National Association of Building Owners and Managers 150 (September 1930): 44–45Google Scholar
  3. Paul E. Holcombe, “Depreciation and Obsolescence in the Tacoma Building,” Bulletin of the National Association of Building Owners and Managers 137 (June 1929): 13–32.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, andDemocracy, 3rd ed. ( New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950 ), 83–84.Google Scholar
  5. 15.
    Florian Urban, Neo-historical East Berlin: Architecture and Urban Design in the German Dexmocratic Republic 1970–1990 ( Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009 ).Google Scholar
  6. 17.
    James Marston Fitch, Historic Preservation: Curatorial Management of the Built World ( New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982 ), 31.Google Scholar
  7. 18.
    Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture trans. Frederick Etchells (New York: Dover, 1986; first published in English in 1931), 48, 263, 3, 138.Google Scholar
  8. Alternately, Le Corbusier, Toward an Architecture, trans. John Goodman (Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2007), 118, 262, 87, 183.Google Scholar
  9. 19.
    Walter Gropius, The New Architecture and the Bauhaus, trans. P. Morton Shand (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965; first published in 1936), 54.Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    Antonio Sant’Elia, “Manifesto of Futurist Architecture,” Journal of the Royal Institute ofBritish Architects 64 (1957): 138.Google Scholar
  11. 22.
    William Zuk and Roger H. Clark. Kinetic Architecture ( New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1970 ), 134.Google Scholar
  12. 25.
    William Uricchio, “Replacement, Displacement and the Cultures of Obsolescence,” in Cultures ofObsolescence: History, Materiality, and the Digital Age, ed. Babette B. Tischleder and Sarah Wasserman ( New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015 ).Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of GreatAmerican Cities (New York: Vintage, 1992; first published in 1961), 7, 187, 189.Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    Vance Packard, The Waste Makers ( New York: David McKay, 1960 ), 4.Google Scholar
  15. 30.
    Bernard Rudofsky, Architecture Without Architects: A Short Introduction toNon-Pedigreed Architecture (Garden City: Doubleday, 1964), caption to Figure 1.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    Paul Rudolph, The Architecture of Paul Rudolph, intro. Sibyl Moholy-Nagy (New York: Praeger, 1970 ), 18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Babette B. Tischleder and Sarah Wasserman 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel M. Abramson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations