Abstract
Discussions of philosophy’s relation to the theatre and the dramatic arts in recent decades routinely invoke what Socrates in the tenth book of Plato’s Republic called the ‘ancient quarrel between poetry and philosophy.’1 This interest in Plato’s critique of tragic poets — which tends to take a dim view of Socrates’ expulsion of Homer and the tragedians from the polity — can be traced to the powerful influence of Friedrich Nietzsche’s general critique of Platonism, metaphysics and Christian morality, as well as to the influence exerted by Martin Heidegger’s lectures on Nietzsche over subsequent French and German philosophy (structuralism, post-structuralism, hermeneutics, and other anti-foundationalisms).2 The long shadow cast by Nietzsche’s anti-Platonism — and by the critique of metaphysics in nineteenth- and twentieth-century philosophy, with which he and Heidegger are perhaps the most strongly identified figures3 — has, to a striking degree, determined discussions of the pairing ‘drama and philosophy’ as a reflection of Nietzsche’s struggle against Platonism.4 It is as if the task today is understood either to be ‘overcoming’ the metaphysical assumptions that underpin Plato’s expulsion of the tragic poets through new defences of dramatic-theatrical practices and tropes;5 or else to be ‘deconstructing’ the (Platonic) terms of the quarrel in a way that might somehow reconcile the (alleged) Platonic and Nietzschean positions.6
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Ansell-Pearson, Keith J. (1987): ‘Nietzsche’s Overcoming of Kant and Metaphysics from Tragedy to Nihilism’, Nietzsche-Studien, Vol. 16, pp. 310–339.
Arendt, Hannah (1958): The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 248–257.
Barish, Jonas (1981): The Anti-Theatrical Prejudice, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Barker, Derek Wai Ming (2009): Tragedy and Citizenship. Conflict, Reconciliation and Democracy from Haemon to Hegel, Albany: State University of New York Press, Chapter 6.
Bernstein, J.M. (2009): ‘Tragedy’, in Richard Eldridge (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butler, Judith (1987): Subjects of Desire. Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France, New York: Columbia University Press.
Butler, Judith (2000): Antigone’s Claim, New York: Columbia University Press.
Cull, Laura (ed.) (2009): Deleuze and Performance, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 4–9
Derrida, Jacques (1978): ‘The Theater of Cruelty and the Closure of Representation’, in: Writing and Difference, trans. by Alan Bass, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–250.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1980): ‘Plato and the Poets’, in P. C. Smith, (ed. and trans.): Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 39–72.
Gjesdal, Kristin (December 2004): ‘Reading Shakespeare-Reading Modernity’, Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, Vol. 9, No. 3, ed. Pelagia Goulimari, pp. 57–81.
Halliwell, Stephen (1996): ‘Plato’s Repudiation of the Tragic’, in: M.D. Silk (ed.): Tragedy and the Tragic, Oxford: Oxford University Press..
Hegel, G.W.F. (1975): The Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law, Its Place in Moral Philosophy, and its Relation to the Positive Sciences, trans. by T.M. Knox, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Heidegger, Martin (1975): Early Greek Thinking, trans. by David Krell and Frank Cappuzzi, New York: Harper.
Herder (2008): Shakespeare, ed. by Gregory Moore, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kant, Immanuel [1781]: Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Critique of Pure Reason, Weldon, T.D., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed., 1958).
Kottman, Paul A. (2008): A Politics of the Scene, Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
Kottman, Paul A. (2009a): Tragic Conditions in Shakespeare. Disinheriting the Globe, Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press, Chapter 2.
Kottman, Paul A. (ed.) (2009b): Philosophers on Shakespeare, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kottman, Paul A. (2013): ‘Why Think About Shakespearean Tragedy?’, in: Clare McEachern (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Shakespearean Tragedy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koyré, A. (1957): From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Krell, David Farrell (ed.) (1991): Nietzsche, Vol. 1–4, New York: Harper.
Kuhn, Thomas (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe (1998): Typography. Mimesis, Philosophy, Politics, Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
Levin, Susan B. (2001): The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry Revisited. Plato and the Greek Literary Tradition, Oxford: Oxford University Press and Gould.
Müller, Kanzler Friedrich. Von (1956): Unterhaltungen mit Goethe, ed. Ernst Grumach, Weimar: H. Böhlaus Nachfolger.
Nancy, Jean-Luc (2000): Being Singular Plural, trans. by Robert D. Richardson and Anne E. O’Byrne, Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
Pippin, Robert (1997): Idealism as Modernism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, Robert B. (2009): ‘Natural and Normative’, Daedelus, Vol. 138, No. 3, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, pp. 35–43.
Pippin, Robert (2010): Nietzsche. Psychology and First Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Plato, The Republic, 606a–b, trans. by Allan Bloom, New York: Basic Books, 2nd sub-edition, 1991, pp. 426–434.
Puchner, Martin (2010): The Drama of Ideas. Platonic Provocations in Theater and Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Read, Alan (2008): Theater, Intimacy and Engagement. The Last Human Value, New York: Palgrave.
Rokem, Freddie (2010): Philosophers and Thespians. Thinking Performance, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rorty, Richard (1982): Consequences of Pragmatism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1964): The First and Second Discourses, trans. by Roger and Judith Masters, New York: St. Martins.
Rousseau, J.J. (2004): Letter to M. D’Alembert and Writings for the Theater, ed. by Allan Bloom, Charles Butterworth, and Christopher Kelly, Lebanon (NH): University Press of New England.
Schelling, F.W.J. (1980): The Unconditional in Human Knowledge. Four Early Essays 1794–1796, trans. by Fritz Marti, Lewisburg (PA): Bucknell University Press.
Schmidt, Dennis (2001): Of Germans and Other Greeks. Tragedy and Ethical Life, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Shakespeare, William ([1600] 1982): Hamlet, Arden Shakespeare, ed. by Harold Jenkins, New York: Routledge, 1.2. 280–89.
Szondi, Peter (2002): An Essay on the Tragic, trans. by Paul Fleming, Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
Thomas (1990): The Ancient Quarrel Between Poetry and Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Velkley, Richard (2002): Being after Rousseau. Philosophy and Culture in Question, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weber, Samuel (2004): Theatricality as Medium, New York: Fordham University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Paul A. Kottman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kottman, P.A. (2014). Thinking about Philosophy and Drama Today: Three Proposals. In: Cull, L., Lagaay, A. (eds) Encounters in Performance Philosophy. Performance Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462725_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462725_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49911-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46272-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)